Display options
Share it on

J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;7(5):375-9. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.375. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

Loosening torque of Universal Abutment screws after cyclic loading: influence of tightening technique and screw coating.

The journal of advanced prosthodontics

Atais Bacchi, Alexandre Regalin, Claudia Lopes Brilhante Bhering, Rodrigo Alessandretti, Aloisio Oro Spazzin

Affiliations

  1. Meridional Faculty - IMED, School of Dentistry, Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, Brazil.
  2. Piracicaba Dental School, Campinas State University, Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Brazil.
  3. University of Passo Fundo, Post-graduate Program in Dentistry, Dental School, Brazil.

PMID: 26576253 PMCID: PMC4644778 DOI: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.375

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tightening technique and the screw coating on the loosening torque of screws used for Universal Abutment fixation after cyclic loading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty implants (Titamax Ti Cortical, HE, Neodent) (n=10) were submerged in acrylic resin and four tightening techniques for Universal Abutment fixation were evaluated: A - torque with 32 Ncm (control); B - torque with 32 Ncm holding the torque meter for 20 seconds; C - torque with 32 Ncm and retorque after 10 minutes; D - torque (32 Ncm) holding the torque meter for 20 seconds and retorque after 10 minutes as initially. Samples were divided into subgroups according to the screw used: conventional titanium screw or diamond like carbon-coated (DLC) screw. Metallic crowns were fabricated for each abutment. Samples were submitted to cyclic loading at 10(6) cycles and 130 N of force. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%).

RESULTS: The tightening technique did not show significant influence on the loosening torque of screws (P=.509). Conventional titanium screws showed significant higher loosening torque values than DLC (P=.000).

CONCLUSION: The use of conventional titanium screw is more important than the tightening techniques employed in this study to provide long-term stability to Universal Abutment screws.

Keywords: Dental prosthesis retention; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Prosthesis loosening; Single-tooth dental implant

References

  1. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Aug;84(2):194-9 - PubMed
  2. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jun;111(6):499-504 - PubMed
  3. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Apr;79(4):430-2 - PubMed
  4. J Prosthodont. 2010 Aug;19(6):458-64 - PubMed
  5. Implant Dent. 1994 Spring;3(1):17-21 - PubMed
  6. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul;71(3-4):404-9 - PubMed
  7. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990;10(5):340-9 - PubMed
  8. Artif Organs. 1997 Jul;21(7):730-4 - PubMed
  9. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May;113(5):405-11 - PubMed
  10. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Oct;74(4):373-9 - PubMed
  11. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Sep;74(3):270-8 - PubMed
  12. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 May;32(5):346-50 - PubMed
  13. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1061-7 - PubMed
  14. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(2):67-73 - PubMed
  15. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jun;91(6):532-7 - PubMed
  16. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):719-28 - PubMed
  17. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Spring;6(1):29-36 - PubMed
  18. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Jan-Feb;19(1):124-32 - PubMed
  19. Implant Dent. 1993 Spring;2(1):50-2 - PubMed
  20. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May;113(5):412-9 - PubMed
  21. Braz Dent J. 2010 Jan;21(1):12-7 - PubMed
  22. Biomaterials. 1995 Apr;16(6):483-8 - PubMed

Publication Types