Display options
Share it on

Front Integr Neurosci. 2015 Oct 29;9:54. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00054. eCollection 2015.

The social neuroscience and the theory of integrative levels.

Frontiers in integrative neuroscience

Raquel Bello-Morales, José María Delgado-García

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid Madrid, Spain.
  2. Division of Neurosciences, Pablo de Olavide University Seville, Spain.

PMID: 26578909 PMCID: PMC4625076 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00054

Abstract

The theory of integrative levels provides a general description of the evolution of matter through successive orders of complexity and integration. Along its development, material forms pass through different levels of organization, such as physical, chemical, biological or sociological. The appearance of novel structures and dynamics during this process of development of matter in complex systems has been called emergence. Social neuroscience (SN), an interdisciplinary field that aims to investigate the biological mechanisms that underlie social structures, processes, and behavior and the influences between social and biological levels of organization, has affirmed the necessity for including social context as an essential element to understand the human behavior. To do this, SN proposes a multilevel integrative approach by means of three principles: multiple determinism, nonadditive determinism and reciprocal determinism. These theoretical principles seem to share the basic tenets of the theory of integrative levels but, in this paper, we aim to reveal the differences among both doctrines. First, SN asserts that combination of neural and social variables can produce emergent phenomena that would not be predictable from a neuroscientific or social psychological analysis alone; SN also suggests that to achieve a complete understanding of social structures we should use an integrative analysis that encompasses levels of organization ranging from the genetic level to the social one; finally, SN establishes that there can be mutual influences between biological and social factors in determining behavior, accepting, therefore, a double influence, upward from biology to social level, and downward, from social level to biology. In contrast, following the theory of integrative levels, emergent phenomena are not produced by the combination of variables from two levels, but by the increment of complexity at one level. In addition, the social behavior and structures might be contemplated not as the result of mixing or summing social and biological influences, but as emergent phenomena that should be described with its own laws. Finally, following the integrative levels view, influences upward, from biology to social level, and downward, from social level to biology, might not be equivalent, since the bottom-up processes are emergent and the downward causation (DC) is not.

Keywords: emergentism; integrative levels; multilevel integrative analysis; reductionism; social neuroscience

References

  1. Neurotherapeutics. 2010 Jul;7(3):250-7 - PubMed
  2. Dev Psychobiol. 2010 May;52(4):299-311 - PubMed
  3. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Nov;35(10):1583-6 - PubMed
  4. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):407-13 - PubMed
  5. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jun 15;67(12):1220-2 - PubMed
  6. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jul;8(7):536-46 - PubMed
  7. Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):410-8 - PubMed
  8. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Oct 1;5(10):418-425 - PubMed
  9. Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(1):1-10 - PubMed
  10. Neurosci Res. 2012 Apr;72(4):283-8 - PubMed
  11. Science. 1945 Jun 8;101(2632):582-5 - PubMed
  12. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Aug;1231:17-22 - PubMed
  13. Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Jan 15;45(2):145-57 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 25;108(4):1262-6 - PubMed
  15. Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):359-79 - PubMed
  16. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Aug;55(8):708-14 - PubMed
  17. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Nov 1;66(9):864-70 - PubMed
  18. Science. 1957 Mar 8;125(3245):429-33 - PubMed
  19. Horm Behav. 2009 Jun;56(1):128-32 - PubMed
  20. Am Psychol. 2001 Sep;56(9):717-34 - PubMed
  21. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009 Oct;30(4):548-57 - PubMed
  22. Neuron. 2010 Mar 25;65(6):768-79 - PubMed
  23. Science. 1945 Mar 2;101(2618):209-15 - PubMed
  24. J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 7;29(1):38-42 - PubMed
  25. EMBO Rep. 2007 Jul;8 Spec No:S16-9 - PubMed
  26. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Dec 15;54(12):1389-98 - PubMed
  27. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:261-76 - PubMed
  28. J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 6;33(10 ):4378-86 - PubMed
  29. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1048-54 - PubMed
  30. Horm Behav. 2010 Jul;58(2):273-81 - PubMed
  31. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Jan;39:237-48 - PubMed
  32. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Oct;6(5):556-63 - PubMed
  33. Neuroscience. 2015 Feb 12;286:171-86 - PubMed
  34. Epigenetics. 2007 Jan-Mar;2(1):22-8 - PubMed
  35. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 May;15(5):200-9 - PubMed
  36. Front Physiol. 2012 Nov 30;3:455 - PubMed
  37. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Oct;22(10):2357-68 - PubMed
  38. Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):419-28 - PubMed
  39. Front Neurosci. 2014 Jun 24;8:171 - PubMed
  40. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Apr 15;15(5):675-80 - PubMed
  41. Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):392-9 - PubMed
  42. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Apr 15;15(5):689-95 - PubMed
  43. Brain. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2006-21 - PubMed
  44. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1224:162-73 - PubMed
  45. EMBO Rep. 2008 Jan;9(1):10-4 - PubMed
  46. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;15(11):509-10; author reply 510-11 - PubMed
  47. Learn Mem. 2012 Feb 21;19(3):99-106 - PubMed
  48. Science. 1945 Jun 8;101(2632):582 - PubMed
  49. Science. 1972 Aug 4;177(4047):393-6 - PubMed
  50. Neuroscience. 2014 Apr 4;264:64-75 - PubMed
  51. Am Psychol. 1992 Aug;47(8):1019-28 - PubMed
  52. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 21;8:309 - PubMed
  53. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 16;103(20):7889-94 - PubMed
  54. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Aug;7(8):847-54 - PubMed
  55. J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 7;25(49):11489-93 - PubMed
  56. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):263-71 - PubMed
  57. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:697-722 - PubMed
  58. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 28;368(1631):20130085 - PubMed
  59. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96 - PubMed
  60. Front Neuroanat. 2015 Sep 30;9:128 - PubMed
  61. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2012 Jan;33(1):17-35 - PubMed
  62. Soc Cogn. 2010;28(6):675-685 - PubMed
  63. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Oct;28:22-7 - PubMed
  64. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Apr;929:41-9 - PubMed
  65. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 May 1;65(9):728-31 - PubMed
  66. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;1(4):471-93 - PubMed
  67. Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 25;7:259 - PubMed
  68. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Feb;36(2):294-7 - PubMed
  69. Nature. 2005 Jun 2;435(7042):673-6 - PubMed
  70. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009 Oct;30(4):534-47 - PubMed
  71. Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):816-26 - PubMed
  72. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Mar;12(3):342-8 - PubMed
  73. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;2(1):1-24 - PubMed
  74. Neurobiol Dis. 2010 Jul;39(1):66-72 - PubMed
  75. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Mar;31(5):883-91 - PubMed
  76. Physiol Behav. 1988;44(2):235-9 - PubMed
  77. Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(5-6):640-52 - PubMed
  78. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Aug 19;12(9):524-38 - PubMed
  79. Science. 2010 Jun 11;328(5984):1408-11 - PubMed
  80. PLoS One. 2007 Nov 07;2(11):e1128 - PubMed
  81. Psychosom Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;59(5):477-80 - PubMed
  82. Prog Neurobiol. 2009 Jun;88(2):127-51 - PubMed
  83. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 May 03;13(6):421-34 - PubMed
  84. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 15;111(15):5503-7 - PubMed
  85. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Apr;38(4):465-78 - PubMed
  86. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Apr 15;15(5):681-8 - PubMed
  87. Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1227-8 - PubMed
  88. Nature. 2010 Jan 21;463(7279):356-9 - PubMed
  89. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Oct;35(4):512-29 - PubMed
  90. EMBO Rep. 2004 Nov;5(11):1016-20 - PubMed
  91. Prog Brain Res. 2008;170:451-62 - PubMed
  92. Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):900-4 - PubMed
  93. Neuron. 2010 Mar 25;65(6):831-44 - PubMed

Publication Types