Display options
Share it on

mBio. 2015 Oct 13;6(5):e01593-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01593-15.

Impacted science: impact is not importance.

mBio

Arturo Casadevall, Ferric C Fang

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA [email protected].
  2. Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.

PMID: 26463169 PMCID: PMC4620476 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01593-15

Abstract

The journal impact factor (IF) exerts a tremendous influence on the conduct of scientists. The obsession with IF has been compared to a medical condition, sometimes referred to as "IF mania" or "impactitis." Here, we analyze the difference between impact and importance, using examples from the history of science to show that these are not equivalent. If impact does not necessarily equal importance, but scientists are focused on high-impact work, there is a danger that misuse of the IF may adversely affect scientific progress. We suggest five measures to fight this malady: (i) diversify journal club selections, (ii) do not judge science on the publication venue, (iii) reduce the reliance on journal citation metrics for employment and advancement, (iv) discuss the misuse of the IF in ethics courses, and (v) cite the most appropriate sources. If IF mania is indeed a medical condition, the most appropriate course of action may be disimpaction.

Copyright © 2015 Casadevall and Fang.

References

  1. Genetics. 2013 Aug;194(4):791-2 - PubMed
  2. Infect Immun. 2011 Oct;79(10):3855-9 - PubMed
  3. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 24;7:291 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Pathol. 2001 Nov;54(11):817-9 - PubMed
  5. Infect Immun. 2014 Apr;82(4):1355-60 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498-502 - PubMed
  7. Infect Immun. 2015 Apr;83(4):1229-33 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33 - PubMed
  9. Am J Med Sci. 2008 Mar;335(3):188-91 - PubMed
  10. mBio. 2014 Mar 18;5(2):e00064-14 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2011 Jun 3;332(6034):1163-6 - PubMed
  12. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):479; discussion 480 - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1135-7 - PubMed
  14. FASEB J. 2014 Sep;28(9):3847-55 - PubMed
  15. Science. 2014 Jan 17;343(6168):262 - PubMed
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):11335-40 - PubMed
  17. Nature. 2012 Mar 28;483(7391):531-3 - PubMed
  18. JAMA. 2006 Jan 4;295(1):90-3 - PubMed
  19. JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2847-50 - PubMed
  20. Infect Immun. 2008 Sep;76(9):3835-6 - PubMed
  21. Science. 2012 Jul 27;337(6093):470-3 - PubMed
  22. Infect Immun. 2015 Dec;83(12):4460-4 - PubMed
  23. Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63 - PubMed
  24. J Biol Chem. 2012 Aug 17;287(34):28816-9 - PubMed
  25. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 7;17(15):R583-5 - PubMed
  26. Nature. 2014 Oct 30;514(7524):550-3 - PubMed
  27. Curr Biol. 2013 Sep 9;23(17):R701-2 - PubMed
  28. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008 Jul-Aug;56(4):223-6 - PubMed
  29. mBio. 2015 Sep 08;6(5):e01259-15 - PubMed
  30. Nature. 2013 Oct 17;502(7471):291-3 - PubMed
  31. Elife. 2013 May 16;2:e00855 - PubMed
  32. Infect Immun. 2009 Sep;77(9):3517-9 - PubMed
  33. Infect Immun. 2009 Oct;77(10):4177-80 - PubMed
  34. Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Dec 05;5:55 - PubMed
  35. Nature. 1953 Apr 25;171(4356):737-8 - PubMed
  36. Dis Model Mech. 2013 Jul;6(4):869-70 - PubMed
  37. Nature. 2014 Oct 30;514(7524):561-2 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support