Display options
Share it on

Iran J Radiol. 2015 Jul 22;12(3):e17832. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.17832v2. eCollection 2015 Jul.

Fluoroscopic Analysis of Tibial Translation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Knees With and Without Bracing During Forward Lunge.

Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society

Maryam Jalali, Farzam Farahmand, Seyed Mohammad Ebrahim Mousavi, Seyed Ali Golestanha, Tahmineh Rezaeian, Shahram Shirvani Broujeni, Mehdi Rahgozar, Fateme Esfandiarpour

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran ; Iran Helal Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
  2. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; Research Center of Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Department of Radiology, Mostafa Khomeini Hospital, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
  5. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  6. Sports Medicine Federation, Tehran, Iran.
  7. Department of Biostatistics and Computer, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  8. Department of Physical Therapy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

PMID: 26557277 PMCID: PMC4632562 DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.17832v2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite several studies with different methods, the effect of functional knee braces on knee joint kinematics is not clear. Direct visualization of joint components through medical imaging modalities may provide the clinicians with more useful information.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, for the first time in the literature, video fluoroscopy was used to investigate the effect of knee bracing on the sagittal plane kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: For twelve male unilateral ACL deficient subjects, the anterior tibial translation was measured during lunge exercise in non-braced and braced conditions. Fluoroscopic images were acquired from the subjects using a digital fluoroscopy system with a rate of 10 fps. The image of each frame was scaled using a calibration coin and analyzed in AutoCAD environment. The angle between the two lines, tangent to the posterior cortexes of the femoral and tibial shafts was measured as the flexion angle. For the fluoroscopic images associated with 0°, 15°, 30°, 45° and 60° knee flexion angles, the relative anterior-posterior configuration of the tibiofemoral joint was assessed by measuring the position of landmarks on the tibia and femur.

RESULTS: Results indicated that the overall anterior translations of the tibia during the eccentric (down) and concentric (up) phases of lunge exercise were 10.4 ± 1.7 mm and 9.0 ± 2.2 mm for non-braced, and 10.1 ± 3.4 mm and 7.4 ± 2.5 mm, for braced conditions, respectively. The difference of the tibial anterior-posterior translation behaviors of the braced and non-braced knees was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopic imaging provides an effective tool to measure the dynamic behavior of the knee joint in the sagittal plane and within the limitations of this study, the pure mechanical stabilizing effect of functional knee bracing is not sufficient to control the anterior tibial translation of the ACL deficient patients during lunge exercise.

Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Brace; Fluoroscopy; Kinematics; Knee Joint

References

  1. Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;17(4):519-24 - PubMed
  2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Oct;72(9):1323-9 - PubMed
  3. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):1512-32 - PubMed
  4. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002 Aug;12 (4):223-9 - PubMed
  5. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Nov;12 (6):622-7 - PubMed
  6. J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Jun 01;8(2):247-51 - PubMed
  7. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):1240-6 - PubMed
  8. Knee. 2009 Aug;16(4):239-44 - PubMed
  9. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Aug;19(5):590-7 - PubMed
  10. Am J Sports Med. 1984 Sep-Oct;12(5):371-4 - PubMed
  11. Orthopedics. 1988 Sep;11(9):1249-52 - PubMed
  12. J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):255-62 - PubMed
  13. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Nov;26(9):950-4 - PubMed
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 19;11:317 - PubMed
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jan;442:39-44 - PubMed
  16. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Jan;24(1):71-6 - PubMed
  17. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Feb;40(2):215-22 - PubMed
  18. J Orthop Res. 2006 Feb;24(2):132-40 - PubMed
  19. Knee. 2005 Jan;12 (1):25-31 - PubMed
  20. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 May;16(5):442-8 - PubMed
  21. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001 Sep;9(5):272-81 - PubMed
  22. Phys Med Biol. 2002 Mar 21;47(6):947-60 - PubMed
  23. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Jan;16(1):61-70 - PubMed
  24. Knee. 2013 Dec;20(6):505-10 - PubMed
  25. J Biomech. 2010 May 7;43(7):1292-301 - PubMed
  26. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Jun;14 (6):555-63 - PubMed
  27. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Sep;76(5):745-9 - PubMed
  28. Clin Sports Med. 2008 Jul;27(3):383-404, vii - PubMed
  29. J Biomech. 1998 Nov;31(11):977-84 - PubMed
  30. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009 Aug 27;1(1):20 - PubMed
  31. Clin Sports Med. 2009 Jan;28(1):51-61 - PubMed
  32. Gait Posture. 2003 Feb;17 (1):34-42 - PubMed
  33. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Nov;9(4):193-201 - PubMed
  34. J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):241-53 - PubMed

Publication Types