Display options
Share it on

BMC Geriatr. 2015 Nov 11;15:147. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6.

The effectiveness of interventions in supporting self-management of informal caregivers of people with dementia; a systematic meta review.

BMC geriatrics

Judith G Huis In Het Veld, Renate Verkaik, Patriek Mistiaen, Berno van Meijel, Anneke L Francke

Affiliations

  1. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  2. Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  3. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  4. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  5. Department of Psychiatry, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  6. Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  7. Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  8. Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands. [email protected].
  9. Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected].

PMID: 26561236 PMCID: PMC4642777 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-015-0145-6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers of people with dementia are challenged in managing the consequences of dementia in daily life. The objective of this meta-review was to synthesize evidence from previous systematic reviews about professional self-management support interventions for this group.

METHODS: In March 2014, searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycINFO. The PRISMA Statement was followed. Interventions were grouped using Martin's targets of self-management, covering 5 targets: relationship with family, maintaining an active lifestyle, psychological wellbeing, techniques to cope with memory changes and information about dementia. Using an evidence synthesis, the outcomes from the included interventions were synthesized and conclusions were drawn about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of interventions within each target.

RESULTS: Ten high-quality systematic reviews were selected. Evidence exists for the effectiveness of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing on stress and social outcomes of informal caregivers. In addition, evidence exists for the effectiveness of interventions targeting information on ability/knowledge. Limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of interventions targeting techniques to cope with memory change on coping skills and mood, and for interventions targeting information on the outcomes sense of competence and decision-making confidence of informal caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS: Scientific evidence exists for the effectiveness of a number of professional self-management support interventions targeting psychological wellbeing and information. Health care professionals could take account of the fact that psycho-education was integrated in most of the self-management support interventions that were found to be effective in this meta-review. Furthermore, longer and more intensive interventions were associated with greater effects.

References

  1. Gerontologist. 2002 Jun;42(3):356-72 - PubMed
  2. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Oct -Nov;48(2):177-87 - PubMed
  3. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Jan;58(1):S58-67 - PubMed
  4. Stroke. 2003 Mar;34(3):676-87 - PubMed
  5. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 May;51(5):657-64 - PubMed
  6. Can J Nurs Res. 2003 Dec;35(4):88-107 - PubMed
  7. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 May-Jun;12(3):240-9 - PubMed
  8. Int Psychogeriatr. 2006 Dec;18(4):577-95 - PubMed
  9. BMC Geriatr. 2007 Jul 27;7:18 - PubMed
  10. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1271-8 - PubMed
  11. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Sep 12;8:38 - PubMed
  12. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 - PubMed
  13. Pflege. 2010 Aug;23(4):223-39 - PubMed
  14. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;26(10):1089-98 - PubMed
  15. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72 - PubMed
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 09;(11):CD005318 - PubMed
  17. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2013 Jan-Feb;21 Spec No:267-75 - PubMed
  18. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Oct;25(10):1581-603 - PubMed
  19. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;29(4):331-44 - PubMed
  20. J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jun;71(6):1405-16 - PubMed
  21. Eur J Ageing. 2012 Nov 7;10(2):75-87 - PubMed
  22. J Adv Nurs. 1994 Sep;20(3):437-43 - PubMed
  23. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 - PubMed
  24. CMAJ. 1997 May 15;156(10):1411-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types