Display options
Share it on

Front Microbiol. 2015 Oct 06;6:1098. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01098. eCollection 2015.

Deterioration to extinction of wastewater bacteria by non-thermal atmospheric pressure air plasma as assessed by 16S rDNA-DGGE fingerprinting.

Frontiers in microbiology

Wael S El-Sayed, Salama A Ouf, Abdel-Aleam H Mohamed

Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University Almadinah Almunawarah, Saudi Arabia ; Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University Cairo, Egypt.
  2. Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University Almadinah Almunawarah, Saudi Arabia ; Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University Giza, Egypt.
  3. Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University Almadinah Almunawarah, Saudi Arabia ; Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University Beni Suef, Egypt.

PMID: 26500637 PMCID: PMC4594161 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01098

Abstract

The use of cold plasma jets for inactivation of a variety of microorganisms has recently been evaluated via culture-based methods. Accordingly, elucidation of the role of cold plasma in decontamination would be inaccurate because most microbial populations within a system remain unexplored owing to the high amount of yet uncultured bacteria. The impact of cold atmospheric plasma on the bacterial community structure of wastewater from two different industries was investigated by metagenomic-based polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) utilizing 16S rRNA genes. Three doses of atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge plasma were applied to wastewater samples on different time scales. DGGE revealed that the bacterial community gradually changed and overall abundance decreased to extinction upon plasma treatment. The bacterial community in food processing wastewater contained 11 key operational taxonomic units that remained almost completely unchanged when exposed to plasma irradiation at 75.5 mA for 30 or 60 s. However, when exposure time was extended to 90 s, only Escherichia coli, Coliforms, Aeromonas sp., Vibrio sp., and Pseudomonas putida survived. Only E. coli, Aeromonas sp., Vibrio sp., and P. putida survived treatment at 81.94 mA for 90 s. Conversely, all bacterial groups were completely eliminated by treatment at 85.34 mA for either 60 or 90 s. Dominant bacterial groups in leather processing wastewater also changed greatly upon exposure to plasma at 75.5 mA for 30 or 60 s, with Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas stutzeri, and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans being sensitive to and eliminated from the community. At 90 s of exposure, all groups were affected except for Pseudomonas sp. and Citrobacter freundii. The same trend was observed for treatment at 81.94 mA. The variability in bacterial community response to different plasma treatment protocols revealed that plasma had a selective impact on bacterial community structure at lower doses and potential bactericidal effects at higher doses.

Keywords: 16S rDNA; DGGE; bacterial community; dielectric barrier discharge plasma; wastewater

References

  1. Nitric Oxide. 2012 Mar 31;26(3):169-73 - PubMed
  2. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Feb 1;39(2):101-12 - PubMed
  3. J Med Microbiol. 2012 Jun;61(Pt 6):793-9 - PubMed
  4. J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Jul;66(1):1-20 - PubMed
  5. J Bacteriol. 1998 Sep;180(18):4765-74 - PubMed
  6. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 May 5;1411(2-3):385-400 - PubMed
  7. J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Apr;116(4):784-94 - PubMed
  8. J Food Sci. 2007 Mar;72(2):M62-6 - PubMed
  9. J Appl Microbiol. 2001 Oct;91(4):625-35 - PubMed
  10. Water Res. 2006 Feb;40(4):775-87 - PubMed
  11. J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Mar;114(3):778-87 - PubMed
  12. Microbiol Rev. 1995 Mar;59(1):143-69 - PubMed
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Oct;75(19):6211-21 - PubMed
  14. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000 Apr 1;32(2):129-141 - PubMed
  15. IUBMB Life. 2003 Oct-Nov;55(10-11):573-8 - PubMed
  16. Inorg Chem. 2010 Jul 19;49(14):6226-39 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463-7 - PubMed
  18. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(1):243-52 - PubMed
  19. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011 Aug;61(2):211-9 - PubMed
  20. Microb Ecol. 1998 Jan;35(1):1-21 - PubMed
  21. Nature. 1990 May 3;345(6270):63-5 - PubMed
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Sep;80(17):5282-91 - PubMed
  23. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004 Mar 1;47(3):279-89 - PubMed
  24. Environ Toxicol. 2004 Jun;19(3):241-9 - PubMed
  25. Virulence. 2012 May 1;3(3):271-9 - PubMed
  26. J Food Prot. 2008 Jul;71(7):1357-65 - PubMed
  27. J Bacteriol. 2010 May;192(9):2305-14 - PubMed
  28. J Biol Chem. 2013 Sep 13;288(37):26464-72 - PubMed
  29. Environ Microbiol. 2006 Nov;8(11):1985-96 - PubMed
  30. Food Microbiol. 2014 Sep;42:109-16 - PubMed
  31. Microbiology. 2002 Aug;148(Pt 8):2309-18 - PubMed
  32. J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Dec;95(15):3204-10 - PubMed
  33. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Mar;59(3):695-700 - PubMed

Publication Types