Display options
Share it on

EJNMMI Phys. 2015 Dec;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40658-015-0109-0. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Effects of ferumoxytol on quantitative PET measurements in simultaneous PET/MR whole-body imaging: a pilot study in a baboon model.

EJNMMI physics

Ronald Jh Borra, Hoon-Sung Cho, Spencer L Bowen, Ulrike Attenberger, Grae Arabasz, Ciprian Catana, Lee Josephson, Bruce R Rosen, Alexander R Guimaraes, Jacob M Hooker

Affiliations

  1. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. [email protected].
  2. Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. [email protected].
  3. Center for Advanced Medical Imaging Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. [email protected].
  4. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea. [email protected].
  5. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. [email protected].
  6. Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. [email protected].
  7. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. [email protected].
  8. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. [email protected].
  9. Center for Advanced Medical Imaging Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA. [email protected].
  10. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. [email protected].
  11. Department of Meridian & Acupuncture, Collaborating Center for Traditional Medicine, East-West Medical Research Institute and School of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea. [email protected].
  12. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. [email protected].
  13. Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. [email protected].
  14. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 26501808 PMCID: PMC4544618 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-015-0109-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous PET/MR imaging depends on MR-derived attenuation maps (mu-maps) for accurate attenuation correction of PET data. Currently, these maps are derived from gradient-echo-based MR sequences, which are sensitive to susceptibility changes. Iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles have been used in the measurement of blood volume, tumor microvasculature, tumor-associated macrophages, and characterizing lymph nodes. Our aim in this study was to assess whether the susceptibility effects associated with iron oxide nanoparticles can potentially affect measured (18)F-FDG PET standardized uptake values (SUV) through effects on MR-derived attenuation maps.

METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Using a Siemens Biograph mMR PET/MR scanner, we evaluated the effects of increasing concentrations of ferumoxytol and ferumoxytol aggregates on MR-derived mu-maps using an agarose phantom. In addition, we performed a baboon experiment evaluating the effects of a single i.v. ferumoxytol dose (10 mg/kg) on the liver, spleen, and pancreas (18)F-FDG SUV at baseline (ferumoxytol-naïve), within the first hour and at 1, 3, 5, and 11 weeks.

RESULTS: Phantom experiments showed mu-map artifacts starting at ferumoxytol aggregate concentrations of 10 to 20 mg/kg. The in vivo baboon data demonstrated a 53% decrease of observed (18)F-FDG SUV compared to baseline within the first hour in the liver, persisting at least 11 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS: A single ferumoxytol dose can affect measured SUV for at least 3 months, which should be taken into account when administrating ferumoxytol in patients needing sequential PET/MR scans. Advances in knowledge 1. Ferumoxytol aggregates, but not ferumoxytol alone, produce significant artifacts in MR-derived attenuation correction maps at approximate clinical dose levels of 10 mg/kg. 2. When performing simultaneous whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/MR, a single dose of ferumoxytol can result in observed SUV decreases up to 53%, depending on the amount of ferumoxytol aggregates in the studied tissue. Implications for patient care Administration of a single, clinically relevant, dose of ferumoxytol can potentially result in changes in observed SUV for a prolonged period of time in the setting of simultaneous PET/MR. These potential changes should be considered in particular when administering ferumoxytol to patients with expected future PET/MR studies, as ferumoxytol-induced SUV changes might interfere with therapy assessment.

Keywords: Attenuation correction; Ferumoxytol; MRI; Multimodal imaging; PET; PET/MR

References

  1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Nov;39(11):1756-66 - PubMed
  2. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Jan;30(1):15-35 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Mar;36 Suppl 1:S93-104 - PubMed
  4. Korean J Radiol. 2010 Jul-Aug;11(4):383-94 - PubMed
  5. Radiology. 2013 Mar;266(3):842-52 - PubMed
  6. Drugs. 2012 Oct 22;72(15):2013-22 - PubMed
  7. Invest Radiol. 2012 Dec;47(12 ):717-24 - PubMed
  8. J Bacteriol. 1936 Aug;32(2):227-37 - PubMed
  9. Int J Oncol. 2009 Oct;35(4):797-804 - PubMed
  10. Insights Imaging. 2013 Aug;4(4):509-12 - PubMed
  11. Pancreas. 2008 Nov;37(4):440-4 - PubMed
  12. Neurology. 2013 Jul 16;81(3):256-63 - PubMed
  13. Am J Hematol. 2010 May;85(5):315-9 - PubMed
  14. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Nov;52(5):826-9 - PubMed
  15. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jun;37(6):1476-9 - PubMed
  16. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):117-21 - PubMed
  17. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013 May;33(5):780-6 - PubMed
  18. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Nov;52(5):907-15 - PubMed
  19. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun 04;6:61-70 - PubMed
  20. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Aug;24(2):388-93 - PubMed
  21. Biochemistry. 1965 May;4:876-83 - PubMed
  22. J Nucl Med. 2012 May;53(5):796-804 - PubMed
  23. J Nucl Med. 2012 Jun;53(6):845-55 - PubMed
  24. MAGMA. 2013 Feb;26(1):99-113 - PubMed
  25. J Nucl Med. 2013 May;54(5):815-24 - PubMed
  26. J Digit Imaging. 2004 Sep;17(3):205-16 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support