Display options
Share it on

Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Oct 13;2(10):2325967114551528. doi: 10.1177/2325967114551528. eCollection 2014 Oct.

Cartilage Repair With or Without Meniscal Transplantation and Osteotomy for Lateral Compartment Chondral Defects of the Knee: Case Series With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

Joshua D Harris, Kristen Hussey, Bryan M Saltzman, Frank M McCormick, Hillary Wilson, Geoffrey D Abrams, Brian J Cole

Affiliations

  1. Center for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA. ; Center for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
  2. Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  3. Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA. ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Veterans Administration Palo Alto, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.

PMID: 26535271 PMCID: PMC4555547 DOI: 10.1177/2325967114551528

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment decision making for chondral defects in the knee is multifactorial. Articular cartilage pathology, malalignment, and meniscal deficiency must all be addressed to optimize surgical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To determine whether significant clinical improvements in validated clinical outcome scores are observed at minimum 2-year follow-up after articular cartilage repair of focal articular cartilage defects of the lateral compartment of the knee with or without concurrent distal femoral osteotomy and lateral meniscus transplant.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS: Symptomatic adults who underwent surgical treatment (microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation [ACI], osteochondral autograft or allograft) of full-thickness lateral compartment chondral defects of the knee with or without a postmeniscectomy compartment or valgus malalignment by a single surgeon with minimum 2-year follow-up were analyzed. Validated patient-reported and surgeon-measured outcomes were collected pre- and postsurgery. Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared via Student t tests.

RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects (mean age, 29.6 ± 10.5 years) were analyzed. Patients had been symptomatic for 2.51 ± 3.52 years prior to surgery and had undergone 2.11 ± 1.18 surgeries prior to study enrollment, with a mean duration of follow-up of 3.65 ± 1.71 years. The mean defect size was 4.42 ± 2.06 cm(2). Surgeries included ACI (n = 18), osteochondral allograft (n = 14), osteochondral autograft (n = 2), and microfracture (n = 1). There were 18 subjects who underwent concomitant surgery (14 lateral meniscus transplant, 3 distal femoral osteotomy, and 1 combined). Statistically significant (P < .05) and clinically meaningful improvements were observed at final follow-up in Lysholm, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores, and patient satisfaction. At follow-up, patients undergoing isolated articular cartilage surgery had a significantly higher KOOS quality of life subscore than did those undergoing articular cartilage surgery and lateral meniscus transplant (P = .039). Otherwise, there were no significant postoperative differences between the isolated and combined surgery groups in any outcome score. Five patients underwent 6 reoperations (1 revision osteochondral allograft, 5 chondroplasties). No patient was converted to knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION: In patients with lateral compartment focal chondral defects with or without lateral meniscal deficiency and valgus malalignment, surgical cartilage repair and correction of concomitant pathology can significantly improve clinical outcomes at 2-year follow-up with no significant differences between isolated and combined surgery and a low rate of complications and reoperations.

Keywords: articular cartilage repair; distal femoral osteotomy; knee; lateral compartment; meniscus transplantation

References

  1. J Knee Surg. 2013 Jun;26(3):203-11 - PubMed
  2. Arthroscopy. 1997 Aug;13(4):456-60 - PubMed
  3. Knee. 2013 Jun;20(3):154-61 - PubMed
  4. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul;29(7):1243-1252.e5 - PubMed
  5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jan;(274):248-64 - PubMed
  6. Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(2):249-54 - PubMed
  7. Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):890-7 - PubMed
  8. Arthroscopy. 2010 Dec;26(12):1655-61 - PubMed
  9. Arthroscopy. 2011 Mar;27(3):409-18 - PubMed
  10. Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec;21(12):1505-9 - PubMed
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep 15;92(12):2220-33 - PubMed
  12. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37 Suppl 1:20S-23S - PubMed
  13. N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 6;331(14):889-95 - PubMed
  14. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2053-63 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):907-14 - PubMed
  16. Arthroscopy. 2010 Jun;26(6):841-52 - PubMed
  17. Arthroscopy. 2002 Sep;18(7):730-4 - PubMed
  18. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4 Suppl 1):2-6 - PubMed
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A Suppl 2:25-32 - PubMed
  20. Arthroscopy. 2007 May;23(5):503-8 - PubMed
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1778-90 - PubMed
  22. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:313-9 - PubMed
  23. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S208-28 - PubMed
  24. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jan;22(1):174-80 - PubMed
  25. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008 Oct;75(5):382-6 - PubMed
  26. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jan;87(1):127-33 - PubMed
  27. Arthroscopy. 2003 May-Jun;19(5):477-84 - PubMed
  28. Am J Sports Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;25(5):692-8 - PubMed

Publication Types