Display options
Share it on

Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jul 07;2(7):2325967114541411. doi: 10.1177/2325967114541411. eCollection 2014 Jul.

Greater Polar Moment of Inertia at the Tibia in Athletes Who Develop Stress Fractures.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

Lee A Weidauer, Teresa Binkley, Matt Vukovich, Bonny Specker

Affiliations

  1. Ethel Austin Martin Program in Human Nutrition, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA. ; Health and Nutritional Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
  2. Ethel Austin Martin Program in Human Nutrition, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
  3. Health and Nutritional Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.

PMID: 26535343 PMCID: PMC4588523 DOI: 10.1177/2325967114541411

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several previous investigations have determined potential risk factors for stress fractures in athletes and military personnel.

PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with the development of stress fractures in female athletes.

STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS: A total of 88 female athletes (cross-country, n = 29; soccer, n = 15; swimming, n = 9; track and field, n = 14; volleyball, n = 12; and basketball, n = 9) aged 18 to 24 years were recruited to participate in a longitudinal bone study and had their left distal tibia at the 4%, 20%, and 66% sites scanned by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Patients included 23 athletes who developed stress fractures during the following year (cases). Whole body, hip, and spine scans were obtained using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Analysis of covariance was used to determine differences in bone parameters between cases and controls after adjusting for height, lower leg length, lean mass, fat mass, and sport.

RESULTS: No differences were observed between cases and controls in any of the DXA measurements. Cases had significantly greater unadjusted trabecular bone mineral content (BMC), greater polar moment of inertia (PMI) at the 20% site, and greater cortical BMC at the 66% site; however, after adjusting for covariates, the differences became nonsignificant. When analyses were repeated using all individuals who had ever had a stress fracture as cases (n = 31) and after controlling for covariates, periosteal circumference was greater in the cases than the controls (71.1 ± 0.7 vs 69.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively; P = .04).

CONCLUSION: A history of stress fractures is associated with larger bones. These findings are important because larger bones were previously reported to be protective against fractures and stress fractures, but study findings indicate that may not always be true. One explanation could be that individuals who sustain stress fractures have greater loading that results in greater periosteal circumference but also results in the development of stress fractures.

Keywords: athletes; female; moment of inertia; pQCT; stress fractures

References

  1. Bone. 2000 Sep;27(3):437-44 - PubMed
  2. Bone. 2005 Aug;37(2):267-73 - PubMed
  3. Am J Sports Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):211-7 - PubMed
  4. Mil Med. 1983 Aug;148(8):666-7 - PubMed
  5. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1179-89 - PubMed
  6. Bone Miner. 1993 Oct;23(1):1-14 - PubMed
  7. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jul;95(1):219-24 - PubMed
  8. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):647-52 - PubMed
  9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Aug;31(8):1088-93 - PubMed
  10. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010 Jun;86(6):447-54 - PubMed
  11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Aug;(245):256-60 - PubMed
  12. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Feb;18(2):352-9 - PubMed
  13. Clin J Sport Med. 1995 Oct;5(4):229-35 - PubMed
  14. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2012 Jun;12 (2):68-73 - PubMed
  15. Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5 - PubMed
  16. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002 Jun;70(6):469-74 - PubMed
  17. J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Sep;11(9):1356-63 - PubMed
  18. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;28(2):245-51 - PubMed
  19. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Apr;18(2):145-53 - PubMed
  20. Bone. 1995 Sep;17(3):197-203 - PubMed
  21. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(3):273-8 - PubMed
  22. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Mar;69(2):326-9 - PubMed
  23. Anat Rec. 1996 Feb;244(2):139-47 - PubMed
  24. Bone. 2004 Sep;35(3):806-16 - PubMed
  25. Mil Med. 1992 Jul;157(7):334-8 - PubMed
  26. Bone. 2013 Aug;55(2):359-66 - PubMed
  27. Bone Miner. 1987 Apr;2(2):73-85 - PubMed
  28. Am J Sports Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):810-8 - PubMed
  29. Bone. 2011 Apr 1;48(4):786-91 - PubMed
  30. J Am Coll Nutr. 1998 Apr;17(2):128-35 - PubMed
  31. J Biomech. 2007;40(4):845-50 - PubMed
  32. Anat Rec. 1987 Sep;219(1):1-9 - PubMed
  33. Bone. 2010 Dec;47(6):1076-9 - PubMed
  34. J Bone Miner Res. 1996 May;11(5):645-53 - PubMed
  35. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 15;113(10):754-9 - PubMed
  36. Am J Sports Med. 1980 Jul-Aug;8(4):265-9 - PubMed
  37. Bone. 2000 Sep;27(3):351-7 - PubMed
  38. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Mar;20(3):520-8 - PubMed
  39. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003 Dec;275(2):1081-101 - PubMed
  40. Bone. 2005 Mar;36(3):465-71 - PubMed
  41. Am J Sports Med. 2001 May-Jun;29(3):304-10 - PubMed

Publication Types