Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jul 07;2(7):2325967114541411. doi: 10.1177/2325967114541411. eCollection 2014 Jul.
Greater Polar Moment of Inertia at the Tibia in Athletes Who Develop Stress Fractures.
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
Lee A Weidauer, Teresa Binkley, Matt Vukovich, Bonny Specker
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Ethel Austin Martin Program in Human Nutrition, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA. ; Health and Nutritional Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
- Ethel Austin Martin Program in Human Nutrition, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
- Health and Nutritional Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
PMID: 26535343
PMCID: PMC4588523 DOI: 10.1177/2325967114541411
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several previous investigations have determined potential risk factors for stress fractures in athletes and military personnel.
PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with the development of stress fractures in female athletes.
STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 88 female athletes (cross-country, n = 29; soccer, n = 15; swimming, n = 9; track and field, n = 14; volleyball, n = 12; and basketball, n = 9) aged 18 to 24 years were recruited to participate in a longitudinal bone study and had their left distal tibia at the 4%, 20%, and 66% sites scanned by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). Patients included 23 athletes who developed stress fractures during the following year (cases). Whole body, hip, and spine scans were obtained using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Analysis of covariance was used to determine differences in bone parameters between cases and controls after adjusting for height, lower leg length, lean mass, fat mass, and sport.
RESULTS: No differences were observed between cases and controls in any of the DXA measurements. Cases had significantly greater unadjusted trabecular bone mineral content (BMC), greater polar moment of inertia (PMI) at the 20% site, and greater cortical BMC at the 66% site; however, after adjusting for covariates, the differences became nonsignificant. When analyses were repeated using all individuals who had ever had a stress fracture as cases (n = 31) and after controlling for covariates, periosteal circumference was greater in the cases than the controls (71.1 ± 0.7 vs 69.4 ± 0.5 mm, respectively; P = .04).
CONCLUSION: A history of stress fractures is associated with larger bones. These findings are important because larger bones were previously reported to be protective against fractures and stress fractures, but study findings indicate that may not always be true. One explanation could be that individuals who sustain stress fractures have greater loading that results in greater periosteal circumference but also results in the development of stress fractures.
Keywords: athletes; female; moment of inertia; pQCT; stress fractures
References
- Bone. 2000 Sep;27(3):437-44 - PubMed
- Bone. 2005 Aug;37(2):267-73 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;24(2):211-7 - PubMed
- Mil Med. 1983 Aug;148(8):666-7 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1179-89 - PubMed
- Bone Miner. 1993 Oct;23(1):1-14 - PubMed
- J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Jul;95(1):219-24 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):647-52 - PubMed
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Aug;31(8):1088-93 - PubMed
- Calcif Tissue Int. 2010 Jun;86(6):447-54 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Aug;(245):256-60 - PubMed
- J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Feb;18(2):352-9 - PubMed
- Clin J Sport Med. 1995 Oct;5(4):229-35 - PubMed
- J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2012 Jun;12 (2):68-73 - PubMed
- Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5 - PubMed
- Calcif Tissue Int. 2002 Jun;70(6):469-74 - PubMed
- J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Sep;11(9):1356-63 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;28(2):245-51 - PubMed
- Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Apr;18(2):145-53 - PubMed
- Bone. 1995 Sep;17(3):197-203 - PubMed
- J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(3):273-8 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Mar;69(2):326-9 - PubMed
- Anat Rec. 1996 Feb;244(2):139-47 - PubMed
- Bone. 2004 Sep;35(3):806-16 - PubMed
- Mil Med. 1992 Jul;157(7):334-8 - PubMed
- Bone. 2013 Aug;55(2):359-66 - PubMed
- Bone Miner. 1987 Apr;2(2):73-85 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):810-8 - PubMed
- Bone. 2011 Apr 1;48(4):786-91 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Nutr. 1998 Apr;17(2):128-35 - PubMed
- J Biomech. 2007;40(4):845-50 - PubMed
- Anat Rec. 1987 Sep;219(1):1-9 - PubMed
- Bone. 2010 Dec;47(6):1076-9 - PubMed
- J Bone Miner Res. 1996 May;11(5):645-53 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 15;113(10):754-9 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1980 Jul-Aug;8(4):265-9 - PubMed
- Bone. 2000 Sep;27(3):351-7 - PubMed
- J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Mar;20(3):520-8 - PubMed
- Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003 Dec;275(2):1081-101 - PubMed
- Bone. 2005 Mar;36(3):465-71 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 2001 May-Jun;29(3):304-10 - PubMed
Publication Types