Display options
Share it on

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 10;112(45):13794-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510530112. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

Atlantic hurricane surge response to geoengineering.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

John C Moore, Aslak Grinsted, Xiaoran Guo, Xiaoyong Yu, Svetlana Jevrejeva, Annette Rinke, Xuefeng Cui, Ben Kravitz, Andrew Lenton, Shingo Watanabe, Duoying Ji

Affiliations

  1. Joint Center for Global Change Studies, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi 96101, Finland; [email protected] [email protected].
  2. Joint Center for Global Change Studies, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; Centre for Ice and Climate, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark;
  3. Joint Center for Global Change Studies, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
  4. Joint Center for Global Change Studies, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool L3 5DA, United Kingdom;
  5. Joint Center for Global Change Studies, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam 14473, Germany;
  6. Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352;
  7. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship, Hobart, Tasmania, TAS 7004, Australia;
  8. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama 237-0061, Japan.
  9. Joint Center for Global Change Studies, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; [email protected] [email protected].

PMID: 26504210 PMCID: PMC4653138 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510530112

Abstract

Devastating floods due to Atlantic hurricanes are relatively rare events. However, the frequency of the most intense storms is likely to increase with rises in sea surface temperatures. Geoengineering by stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection cools the tropics relative to the polar regions, including the hurricane Main Development Region in the Atlantic, suggesting that geoengineering may mitigate hurricanes. We examine this hypothesis using eight earth system model simulations of climate under the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G3 and G4 schemes that use stratospheric aerosols to reduce the radiative forcing under the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 scenario. Global mean temperature increases are greatly ameliorated by geoengineering, and tropical temperature increases are at most half of those temperature increases in the RCP4.5. However, sulfate injection would have to double (to nearly 10 teragrams of SO2 per year) between 2020 and 2070 to balance the RCP4.5, approximately the equivalent of a 1991 Pinatubo eruption every 2 y, with consequent implications for stratospheric ozone. We project changes in storm frequencies using a temperature-dependent generalized extreme value statistical model calibrated by historical storm surges and observed temperatures since 1923. The number of storm surge events as big as the one caused by the 2005 Katrina hurricane are reduced by about 50% compared with no geoengineering, but this reduction is only marginally statistically significant. Nevertheless, when sea level rise differences in 2070 between the RCP4.5 and geoengineering are factored into coastal flood risk, we find that expected flood levels are reduced by about 40 cm for 5-y events and about halved for 50-y surges.

Keywords: climate engineering; extremes; flooding

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 16;110(29):E2667 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 7;107(36):15699-703 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 23;110(30):12219-24 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 2;110(14):5369-73 - PubMed
  5. Science. 1990 Sep 14;249(4974):1251-6 - PubMed
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 16;110(29):E2665-6 - PubMed
  7. Nature. 2012 Apr 12;484(7393):228-32 - PubMed
  8. Science. 2008 May 30;320(5880):1201-4 - PubMed
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 27;109(48):19601-5 - PubMed

Publication Types