Display options
Share it on

Hand (N Y). 2015 Dec;10(4):607-12. doi: 10.1007/s11552-015-9749-8. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

Satisfaction and functional outcome with "self-care" for the management of fifth metacarpal fractures.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)

David Gamble, Paul J Jenkins, Martyn J Edge, Alisdair Gilmour, Iain C Anthony, Margaret Nugent, Lech A Rymaszewski

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 OSF UK.

PMID: 26568712 PMCID: PMC4641074 DOI: 10.1007/s11552-015-9749-8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fifth metacarpal fractures are common and comprise a significant proportion of traditional orthopaedic fracture clinic workload. We reviewed the functional outcome and the satisfaction of patients managed with a new protocol that promoted "self-care" and resulted in the discharge of most of these patients from the emergency department with no further follow-up.

METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of patients discharged with a fifth metacarpal fracture between April 2012 to October 2012. A postal questionnaire was sent to each patient, followed by a telephone call. Patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D, QuickDASH) and patient satisfaction were assessed. Of the 167 patients eligible for the study, 5 were excluded. Of the remaining 162, 64 were uncontactable or declined to participate. The mean follow-up time was 21.6 months (SD 1.9, range 18.1 to 24.7).

RESULTS: The median EQ-5D health index score was 0.87 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), and the median QuickDASH score was 2.3 (IQR 0 to 6.8). Seventy-nine (80.6 %) patients were satisfied with the outcome of their injury, while 83 (84.9 %) reported being satisfied with the process. There was no difference between those with a fracture or those without a fracture in EQ-5D (p = 0.307) or QuickDASH (p = 0.820).

CONCLUSION: Fifth metacarpal fractures can be managed effectively through an Emergency Department protocol without any formal orthopaedic follow-up. This pathway lead to excellent patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction. This protocol has reduced unnecessary hospital attendances for patients and increased the time available for clinicians to deal with more challenging injuries.

Keywords: Fracture; Fracture clinic redesign; Metacarpal; Virtual fracture clinic

References

  1. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43 - PubMed
  2. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23 (3):297-301 - PubMed
  3. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Dec;123(10):534-7 - PubMed
  4. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007 Feb;32(1):69-73 - PubMed
  5. J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Jun;26(3):261-3 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Sep;52(6):1159-65 - PubMed
  7. Injury. 1986 May;17(3):189-92 - PubMed
  8. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jan;37(1):42-6 - PubMed
  9. J Trauma. 1987 May;27(5):486-90 - PubMed
  10. J Hand Ther. 1993 Oct-Dec;6(4):263-5 - PubMed
  11. Injury. 1986 Jul;17(4):277-8 - PubMed
  12. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999 Sep;33(3):315-7 - PubMed
  13. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003210 - PubMed
  14. J Hand Surg Br. 1989 May;14(2):165-7 - PubMed
  15. Injury. 1991 Sep;22(5):394-6 - PubMed
  16. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995 Sep;29(3):269-70 - PubMed
  17. Hand (N Y). 2007 Dec;2(4):212-7 - PubMed
  18. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990 Dec;61(6):531-4 - PubMed
  19. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 13;4(6):e005282 - PubMed
  20. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46 - PubMed
  21. Injury. 1998 Jan;29(1):5-9 - PubMed
  22. Arch Emerg Med. 1988 Dec;5(4):212-5 - PubMed
  23. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Dec;33(6):732-9 - PubMed

Publication Types