Display options
Share it on

Inj Epidemiol. 2014;1(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40621-014-0019-y. Epub 2014 Jul 24.

Implementing injury surveillance systems alongside injury prevention programs: evaluation of an online surveillance system in a community setting.

Injury epidemiology

Christina L Ekegren, Alex Donaldson, Belinda J Gabbe, Caroline F Finch

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004 Australia.
  2. Australian Centre for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC 3353 Australia.

PMID: 26613071 PMCID: PMC4648950 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-014-0019-y

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research aimed at improving injury surveillance standards has focused mainly on issues of data quality rather than upon the implementation of surveillance systems. There are numerous settings where injury surveillance is not mandatory and having a better understanding of the barriers to conducting injury surveillance would lead to improved implementation strategies. One such setting is community sport, where a lack of available epidemiological data has impaired efforts to reduce injury. This study aimed to i) evaluate use of an injury surveillance system following delivery of an implementation strategy; and ii) investigate factors influencing the implementation of the system in community sports clubs.

METHODS: A total of 78 clubs were targeted for implementation of an online injury surveillance system (approximately 4000 athletes) in five community Australian football leagues concurrently enrolled in a pragmatic trial of an injury prevention program called FootyFirst. System implementation was evaluated quantitatively, using the RE-AIM framework, and qualitatively, via semi-structured interviews with targeted-users.

RESULTS: Across the 78 clubs, there was 69% reach, 44% adoption, 23% implementation and 9% maintenance. Reach and adoption were highest in those leagues receiving concurrent support for the delivery of FootyFirst. Targeted-users identified several barriers and facilitators to implementation including personal (e.g. belief in the importance of injury surveillance), socio-contextual (e.g. understaffing and athlete underreporting) and systems factors (e.g. the time taken to upload injury data into the online system).

CONCLUSIONS: The injury surveillance system was implemented and maintained by a small proportion of clubs. Outcomes were best in those leagues receiving concurrent support for the delivery of FootyFirst, suggesting that engagement with personnel at all levels can enhance uptake of surveillance systems. Interview findings suggest that increased uptake could also be achieved by educating club personnel on the importance of recording injuries, developing clearer injury surveillance guidelines, increasing club staffing and better remunerating those who conduct surveillance, as well as offering flexible surveillance systems in a range of accessible formats. By increasing the usage of surveillance systems, data will better represent the target population and increase our understanding of the injury problem, and how to prevent it, in specific settings.

Keywords: Australian football; Implementation; Injury; Interviews; Qualitative; RE-AIM framework; Safety; Sport; Surveillance

References

  1. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;46(10):759-65 - PubMed
  2. Mil Med. 2009 May;174(5):470-8 - PubMed
  3. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;28(2):312-8 - PubMed
  4. Br J Sports Med. 2013 May;47(8):473-5 - PubMed
  5. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;19(11):1270-3 - PubMed
  6. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 May;16(3):189-93 - PubMed
  7. J Sci Med Sport. 2004 Jun;7(2):226-31 - PubMed
  8. J Sci Med Sport. 2005 Mar;8(1):1-14 - PubMed
  9. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(13):1026-30 - PubMed
  10. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):78-86 - PubMed
  11. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;44(13):973-8 - PubMed
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;40(3):193-201 - PubMed
  13. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;38(6):743-9 - PubMed
  14. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2008 Mar;15(1):33-40 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1476-83 - PubMed
  16. BMJ. 2007 Jun 2;334(7604):1150 - PubMed
  17. J Sci Med Sport. 2002 Dec;5(4):321-35 - PubMed
  18. Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Apr;17(2):104-12 - PubMed
  19. Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7(3):245-8 - PubMed
  20. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 - PubMed
  21. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):320-4 - PubMed
  22. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;34(6):745-50 - PubMed
  23. Inj Prev. 2011 Jun;17(3):e4 - PubMed
  24. Inj Prev. 2009 Apr;15(2):105-10 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1115-7 - PubMed
  26. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):41-50 - PubMed
  27. Clin J Sport Med. 2013 Nov;23(6):430-8 - PubMed
  28. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7 - PubMed
  29. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Jul 27;50(RR-13):1-35; quiz CE1-7 - PubMed
  30. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Jun;25(3):315-22 - PubMed
  31. J Sci Med Sport. 1999 Mar;2(1):42-56 - PubMed
  32. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Oct;18(5):605-14 - PubMed
  33. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;46(1):70-4 - PubMed
  34. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Jan;17(1):17-24 - PubMed
  35. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;44(8):555-62 - PubMed

Publication Types