Display options
Share it on

J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Oct;27(10):3199-202. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3199. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

Comparison between a center of mass and a foot pressure sensor system for measuring gait parameters in healthy adults.

Journal of physical therapy science

Gunoh Park, Youngkeun Woo

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy, Design Rehabilitation Hospital, Republic of Korea.
  2. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Sciences, Jeonju University, Republic of Korea.

PMID: 26644674 PMCID: PMC4668165 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.3199

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between an accelerometer system and a foot pressure sensor system for measuring gait characteristics during walking in healthy adults. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-five healthy participants with no neurological, musculoskeletal, or cardiopulmonary disorders volunteered for this study. Gait characteristics were measured while participants walked freely along a 10-m walkway using two different measurement systems simultaneously. The first analysis system was based on center of mass using a wireless tri-axial accelerometer and the second system was a foot pressure sensor system. [Results] There was a significant and high correlation between the two systems with respect to gait velocity and cadence. The stride length as a percentage of the stride height measured with the center of mass system was significantly and highly correlated with stride length and stride velocity that was measured with the foot pressure system. Furthermore, stride length from the center of mass system was significantly and highly correlated with stride length and stride velocity from the foot pressure system. [Conclusion] A gait analysis based on a center of mass system is a valid method to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in a clinical setting.

Keywords: Accelerometer; Center of mass; Gait

References

  1. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2009 Dec;32 Suppl 1:S127-35 - PubMed
  2. Clin Rehabil. 2006 May;20(5):438-44 - PubMed
  3. Gait Posture. 2003 Oct;18(2):1-10 - PubMed
  4. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Oct;108(1):129-37 - PubMed
  5. Gait Posture. 2003 Feb;17(1):68-74 - PubMed
  6. Mov Disord. 2006 Jun;21(6):794-9 - PubMed
  7. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1779-80 - PubMed
  8. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;59(3):568-73 - PubMed
  9. Med Eng Phys. 2008 Dec;30(10):1364-86 - PubMed
  10. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 May 17;5:13 - PubMed
  11. Physiotherapy. 2012 Sep;98(3):256-9 - PubMed
  12. Gait Posture. 2009 Apr;29(3):444-8 - PubMed
  13. Gait Posture. 2005 Dec;22(4):317-21 - PubMed
  14. Gait Posture. 2009 Aug;30(2):192-6 - PubMed
  15. J Biomech. 2003 Aug;36(8):1215-8 - PubMed
  16. Phys Ther. 1997 Jun;77(6):646-60 - PubMed
  17. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(19-20):1848-53 - PubMed
  18. Age Ageing. 2005 Nov;34(6):556-60 - PubMed
  19. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1307-11 - PubMed
  20. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):419-25 - PubMed
  21. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):921-4 - PubMed

Publication Types