Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 Nov 13;3(11):2325967115616581. doi: 10.1177/2325967115616581. eCollection 2015 Nov.
Residual Impact of Previous Injury on Musculoskeletal Characteristics in Special Forces Operators.
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
Jeffrey J Parr, Nicholas C Clark, John P Abt, Julie Y Kresta, Karen A Keenan, Shawn F Kane, Scott M Lephart
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Sports Medicine and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
- School of Sport, Health, and Applied Science, St Mary's University, Strawberry Hill, London, UK.
- College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
- Department of Physical Therapy, Methodist University, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.
- US Army Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, USA.
PMID: 26740952
PMCID: PMC4687836 DOI: 10.1177/2325967115616581
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal injuries are a significant burden to United States Army Special Operations Forces. The advanced tactical skill level and physical training required of Army Special Operators highlights the need to optimize musculoskeletal characteristics to reduce the likelihood of suffering a recurrent injury.
PURPOSE: To identify the residual impact of previous injury on musculoskeletal characteristics.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Isokinetic strength of the knee, shoulder, and back and flexibility of the shoulder and hamstrings were assessed as part of a comprehensive human performance protocol, and self-reported musculoskeletal injury history was obtained. Subjects were stratified based on previous history of low back, knee, or shoulder injury, and within-group and between-group comparisons were made for musculoskeletal variables.
RESULTS: Knee injury analysis showed no significant strength or flexibility differences. Shoulder injury analysis found internal rotation strength of the healthy subjects (H) was significantly higher compared with injured (I) and uninjured (U) limbs of the injured group (H, 60.8 ± 11.5 percent body weight [%BW]; I, 54.5 ± 10.5 %BW; U, 55.5 ± 11.3 %BW) (P = .014 [H vs I] and P = .05 [H vs U]). The external rotation/internal rotation strength ratio was significantly lower in the healthy subjects compared with injured and uninjured limbs of the injured group (H, 0.653 ± 0.122; I, 0.724 ± 0.121; U, 0.724 ± 0.124) (P = .026 [H vs I] and P = .018 [H vs U]). Posterior shoulder tightness was significantly different between the injured and uninjured limb of the injured group (I, 111.6° ± 9.4°; U, 114.4° ± 9.3°; P = .008). The back injury analysis found no significant strength differences between the healthy and injured groups.
CONCLUSION: Few physical differences existed between operators with prior knee or back injury. However, operators with a previous history of shoulder injury demonstrated significantly less shoulder strength than uninjured operators as well as decreased shoulder flexibility on the injured side. All operators, regardless of prior injury, must perform the same tasks; therefore, a targeted injury rehabilitation/human performance training specifically focused on internal rotation strength and tightness of the posterior capsule may help reduce the risk for recurrence of injury. Operators presenting with musculoskeletal asymmetries and/or insufficient strength ratios may be predisposed to musculoskeletal injury.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Specific fitness programs to compensate for deficiencies in strength and flexibility need to be designed that may reduce the risk of injuries in Special Forces Operators.
Keywords: injury prevention; military; muscle injury; performance; residual
References
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Aug;36(8):1296-300 - PubMed
- Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;88(5):626-31 - PubMed
- J Athl Train. 1992;27(4):362-5 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):81-5 - PubMed
- Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):48-52 - PubMed
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Aug;38(8):1505-9 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):1922-30 - PubMed
- Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):22-9 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Apr;87(4):824-31 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;17(1):89-91 - PubMed
- Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):306-13 - PubMed
- Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Nov;15(6):436-41 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(1):87-91 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1166-71 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998 Jul-Aug;6(4):237-48 - PubMed
- J Sci Med Sport. 2003 Mar;6(1):51-62 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):617-21 - PubMed
- Sports Health. 2010 Mar;2(2):94-100 - PubMed
- Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):333-41 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Jun;66(5):734-40 - PubMed
- Mil Med. 2014 Oct;179(10 ):1106-12 - PubMed
- J Spec Oper Med. 2010 Fall;10(4):22-33 - PubMed
- J Spec Oper Med. 2009 Fall;9(4):11-5 - PubMed
- J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Mar;22(2):503-8 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1469-75 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Dec;72(10):1562-74 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1988 Nov-Dec;16(6):577-85 - PubMed
- J Athl Train. 2013 Jan-Feb;48(1):31-8 - PubMed
- Ergonomics. 2005 Sep 15-Nov 15;48(11-14):1568-75 - PubMed
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):731-5 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1991 Jan-Feb;19(1):76-81 - PubMed
- Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 15;173(8):941-8 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 Oct;10(8):757-64 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;28(5):668-73 - PubMed
- Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:29-34 - PubMed
- Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Mar;75(3):453-67 - PubMed
- Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jan;38(1 Suppl):S156-81 - PubMed
- J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996 Dec;24(6):336-41 - PubMed
- Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jun;17(6):641-52 - PubMed
- Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012 Sep 10;4(1):33 - PubMed
- J Spec Oper Med. 2010 Fall;10(4):2-21 - PubMed
- Am J Sports Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):173-6 - PubMed
Publication Types