Display options
Cite
Guyon J, Gey N, Goran D, et al. Advancing FIB assisted 3D EBSD using a static sample setup. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;161:161-167doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.11.011.
Guyon, J., Gey, N., Goran, D., Chalal, S., & Pérez-Willard, F. (2016). Advancing FIB assisted 3D EBSD using a static sample setup. Ultramicroscopy, 161161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.11.011
Guyon, Julien, et al. "Advancing FIB assisted 3D EBSD using a static sample setup." Ultramicroscopy vol. 161 (2016): 161-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.11.011
Guyon J, Gey N, Goran D, Chalal S, Pérez-Willard F. Advancing FIB assisted 3D EBSD using a static sample setup. Ultramicroscopy. 2016 Feb;161:161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 30. PMID: 26686662.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ultramicroscopy. 2016 Feb;161:161-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

Advancing FIB assisted 3D EBSD using a static sample setup.

Ultramicroscopy

Julien Guyon, Nathalie Gey, Daniel Goran, Smail Chalal, Fabián Pérez-Willard

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire d'Etude des Microstructures et de Mécanique des Matériaux, LEM3, CNRS ISGMP, Université de Lorraine, F-57045 Metz Cedex 01, France; Laboratory of Excellence on Design of Alloy Metals for low-mAss Structures ('LabEx DAMAS'), Université de Lorraine, F-57045 Metz Cedex 01, France.
  2. Laboratoire d'Etude des Microstructures et de Mécanique des Matériaux, LEM3, CNRS ISGMP, Université de Lorraine, F-57045 Metz Cedex 01, France; Laboratory of Excellence on Design of Alloy Metals for low-mAss Structures ('LabEx DAMAS'), Université de Lorraine, F-57045 Metz Cedex 01, France. Electronic address: [email protected].
  3. Bruker Nano GmbH, Am Studio 2D, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
  4. Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Carl-Zeiss Street 56, 73447 Oberkochen, Germany.

PMID: 26686662 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.11.011

Abstract

A new setup for automatic 3D EBSD data collection in static mode has been developed using a conventional FIB-SEM system. This setup requires no stage or sample movements between the FIB milling and EBSD mapping. Its capabilities were tested experimentally on a coherent twin boundary of an INCONEL sample. Our result demonstrates that this static setup holds many advantages in terms of data throughput and quality as compared with other ones requiring stage/sample movements. The most important advantages are the better slice alignment and an improved orientation precision in 3D space, both being prerequisite for a reliable grain boundary characterization.

Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: 3D EBSD; FIB–SEM; Grain boundary; Static setup; Tomography

Publication Types