Display options
Share it on

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 01;10(12):e0143748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143748. eCollection 2015.

Curriculum Mapping with Academic Analytics in Medical and Healthcare Education.

PloS one

Martin Komenda, Martin Víta, Christos Vaitsis, Daniel Schwarz, Andrea Pokorná, Nabil Zary, Ladislav Dušek

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
  2. Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
  3. Department of Learning, Informatics Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

PMID: 26624281 PMCID: PMC4666663 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143748

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No universal solution, based on an approved pedagogical approach, exists to parametrically describe, effectively manage, and clearly visualize a higher education institution's curriculum, including tools for unveiling relationships inside curricular datasets.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to solve the issue of medical curriculum mapping to improve understanding of the complex structure and content of medical education programs. Our effort is based on the long-term development and implementation of an original web-based platform, which supports an outcomes-based approach to medical and healthcare education and is suitable for repeated updates and adoption to curriculum innovations.

METHODS: We adopted data exploration and visualization approaches in the context of medical curriculum innovations in higher education institutions domain. We have developed a robust platform, covering detailed formal metadata specifications down to the level of learning units, interconnections, and learning outcomes, in accordance with Bloom's taxonomy and direct links to a particular biomedical nomenclature. Furthermore, we used selected modeling techniques and data mining methods to generate academic analytics reports from medical curriculum mapping datasets.

RESULTS: We present a solution that allows users to effectively optimize a curriculum structure that is described with appropriate metadata, such as course attributes, learning units and outcomes, a standardized vocabulary nomenclature, and a tree structure of essential terms. We present a case study implementation that includes effective support for curriculum reengineering efforts of academics through a comprehensive overview of the General Medicine study program. Moreover, we introduce deep content analysis of a dataset that was captured with the use of the curriculum mapping platform; this may assist in detecting any potentially problematic areas, and hence it may help to construct a comprehensive overview for the subsequent global in-depth medical curriculum inspection.

CONCLUSIONS: We have proposed, developed, and implemented an original framework for medical and healthcare curriculum innovations and harmonization, including: planning model, mapping model, and selected academic analytics extracted with the use of data mining.

References

  1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:511-5 - PubMed
  2. Comput Biol Med. 2015 Aug;63:74-82 - PubMed
  3. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Apr 15;71(2):20 - PubMed
  4. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:1163-7 - PubMed
  5. Med Educ. 2003 Oct;37(10):861-8 - PubMed
  6. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:60 - PubMed
  7. Med Teach. 1999;21(6):546-52 - PubMed
  8. Med Teach. 2014 Mar;36(3):208-15 - PubMed
  9. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:95-9 - PubMed
  10. PeerJ. 2014 Nov 25;2:e683 - PubMed
  11. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2015 May-Jun;43(3):168-80 - PubMed
  12. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:494-8 - PubMed
  13. Med Teach. 2001 Mar;23(2):123-137 - PubMed
  14. Med Teach. 2002 Mar;24(2):125-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types