Display options
Share it on

J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2015 Dec 18;6:52. doi: 10.1186/s40104-015-0052-x. eCollection 2015.

Influences of dietary protein sources and crude protein levels on intracellular free amino acid profile in the longissimus dorsi muscle of finishing gilts.

Journal of animal science and biotechnology

Chunfu Qin, Ping Huang, Kai Qiu, Wenjuan Sun, Ling Xu, Xin Zhang, Jingdong Yin

Affiliations

  1. State Key Lab of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science & Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193 China.
  2. Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, Rongchang, Chongqing, 450023 China.

PMID: 26688726 PMCID: PMC4683754 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-015-0052-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study was carried out to determine effects of dietary protein source and crude protein (CP) level on carcass characteristics, meat quality, and muscle amino acid (AA) profile in finishing gilts. The experiment was designed as a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with two sources of dietary proteins (cottonseed meal, CSM vs. soybean meal, SBM) and two levels of CP (12 % vs. 14 %, as-fed basis). Seventy-two crossbred gilts (89.5 ± 0.9 kg) were allotted to one of four dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design for a period of 28 d. All diets were formulated to be isoenergetic and similar concentrations of standardized ileal digestible essential AA covering the nutrient requirements of pigs.

RESULTS: Growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality were not affected by dietary protein source nor crude protein level (P > 0.10) except that average daily feed intake was increased by CSM diets (P = 0.03). Gilts offered reduced protein diets had lower muscle pH45min (P < 0.05). Neither dietary protein source nor crude protein level influenced N deposition. However, reduced protein diets decreased N intake, N excretion, and serum urea nitrogen content, whilst improved N efficiency (P < 0.01). CSM diets increased N intake (P = 0.04), but did not depress N efficiency. The concentrations of phenylalanine, tryptophan, cysteine and tyrosine (P < 0.05) of the longissimus muscle were decreased when gilts offered CSM diets, while muscle intracellular free valine concentration was increased (P = 0.03). The gilts offered reduced protein diets had greater intracellular concentrations of free methionine, lysine, and total AA in muscle (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: These results suggest that CSM could replace SBM as a primary protein source in finishing pig diets in terms of performance, N efficiency, carcass characteristics, and meat quality, but decrease the concentrations of muscle specific AA. Furthermore, the reduced protein diet played an important role in increasing muscle intracellular concentrations of specific free amino acids (FAA), and in reducing the relative ratios of specific FAA to lysine in longissimus dorsi muscle of pig, whose biological meaning needs further studies.

Keywords: Dietary protein source; Finishing gilt; Muscle free amino acids; Nitrogen efficiency; Performance; Pork quality

References

  1. Br J Nutr. 1990 Nov;64(3):663-77 - PubMed
  2. Meat Sci. 2006 May;73(1):157-65 - PubMed
  3. Br J Nutr. 2015 Mar 14;113(5):739-48 - PubMed
  4. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Apr;39(4):503-13 - PubMed
  5. J Anim Sci. 2002 Mar;80(3):617-27 - PubMed
  6. J Anim Sci. 2003 Jun;81(6):1529-37 - PubMed
  7. Springerplus. 2013 Sep 23;2:483 - PubMed
  8. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Apr;296(4):E603-13 - PubMed
  9. J Anim Sci. 2001 Nov;79(11):2857-65 - PubMed
  10. J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(12):4391-400 - PubMed
  11. J Anim Sci. 2002 Nov;80(11):2911-9 - PubMed
  12. J Anim Sci. 2014 Feb;92(2):637-44 - PubMed
  13. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009 Jan;12(1):78-85 - PubMed
  14. J Anim Sci. 1995 Feb;73(2):433-40 - PubMed
  15. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jan;278(1):E83-9 - PubMed
  16. J Anim Sci. 2004 Oct;82(10):2829-39 - PubMed
  17. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Jan 9;313(2):429-36 - PubMed
  18. J Anim Sci. 1998 Nov;76(11):2818-32 - PubMed
  19. Meat Sci. 2013 Sep;95(1):123-8 - PubMed
  20. J Anim Sci. 1995 Oct;73(10):3000-8 - PubMed
  21. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Feb;55(1):117-26 - PubMed
  22. Meat Sci. 2010 Jun;85(2):240-4 - PubMed
  23. Anal Biochem. 1984 Jan;136(1):65-74 - PubMed
  24. Meat Sci. 2007 Apr;75(4):687-95 - PubMed
  25. Meat Sci. 1999 Dec;53(4):259-67 - PubMed
  26. Animal. 2010 Mar;4(3):323-33 - PubMed

Publication Types