Display options
Share it on

J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):214-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.170398.

Role of Embryo Glue as a transfer medium in the outcome of fresh non-donor in-vitro fertilization cycles.

Journal of human reproductive sciences

Neeta Singh, Monica Gupta, Alka Kriplani, Perumal Vanamail

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

PMID: 26752856 PMCID: PMC4691973 DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.170398

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EmbryoGlue is a hyaluronan-enriched embryo transfer (ET) medium which aids in implantation of embryos, hence, improves pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization-ET cycles (IVF-ET).

AIM: To evaluate the role of EmbryoGlue in improving implantation and pregnancy rates.

DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective case-control study conducted at assisted reproductive center of a tertiary care hospital.

METHOD: In 42 women undergoing IVF, embryos were transferred into 50 μL of EmbryoGlue for 10 min prior to transfer inside uterine cavity. In the control group (n = 42), embryos were transferred to conventional blastocyst culture medium. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS IBM version 19.0.

RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy rate in the study group was 7% higher than the control group. The difference, however, was not statistically significant. In addition, no improvement in implantation rates was observed in the study group. However, significant difference (P = 0.04) in clinical pregnancy rate was observed with the EmbryoGlue in patients with previous IVF failure. In the study group, 50% patients (6/12) with previous IVF failure had successful implantation, but in the control group none of the patients (0/11) with previous implantation failure could achieve pregnancy.

CONCLUSION: It is difficult to conclude a favourable role of EmbryoGlue in IVF-ET cycles with a good prognosis. However, in patients with recurrent implantation failure, it may be considered as a useful transfer medium.

Keywords: Embryo transfer; hyaluronan; implantation; in-vitro fertilization; pregnancy; recurrent implantation failure

References

  1. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006 May;23(5):207-12 - PubMed
  2. J Reprod Fertil. 1988 Mar;82(2):843-56 - PubMed
  3. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jul;90(1):214-6 - PubMed
  4. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Dec;15(6):701-7 - PubMed
  5. Hum Reprod. 2007 Sep;22(9):2444-8 - PubMed
  6. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 May;291(5):1173-9 - PubMed
  7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Aug;14(7):398-403 - PubMed
  8. Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan;87(1):48-52 - PubMed
  9. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Jul;29(7):679-85 - PubMed
  10. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000 Nov;57(3):256-61 - PubMed
  11. Hum Reprod. 1995 Feb;10(2):425-30 - PubMed
  12. Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1669-73 - PubMed
  13. Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):604-12 - PubMed
  14. Reproduction. 2002 Jul;124(1):141-53 - PubMed
  15. Biomacromolecules. 2002 May-Jun;3(3):547-53 - PubMed
  16. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Sep;18(9):519-25 - PubMed
  17. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2009 Nov-Dec;37(11-12):884-9 - PubMed
  18. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79(6):1434-8 - PubMed

Publication Types