Display options
Share it on

Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2015;2015:546705. doi: 10.1155/2015/546705. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

Comparison between Two Decades of Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Diseases and Risk Factors in a Brazilian Urban Centre.

Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases

Maria Aparecida Alves de Oliveira Serra, Cristina de Souza Chaves, Zirlane Castelo Branco Coêlho, Naya Lúcia de Castro Rodrigues, Josias Martins Vale, Maria Jânia Teixeira, Francisco Josemar Alves de Oliveira, Márcio Flávio Moura de Araújo, Ivo Castelo Branco Coelho

Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Ceará, Rua Monsenhor Furtado 177, Rodolfo Teófilo, 60430-350 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
  2. University of International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony, Brazil.

PMID: 26692338 PMCID: PMC4673330 DOI: 10.1155/2015/546705

Abstract

Objectives. This study's objective was to compare the prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors in children in urban communities, in the Brazilian Northeast, between two decades. Methods. This quantitative transversal study consisted of a comparative analysis of two different samples: the first viewing the years 1992-1996 and the other through a coproepidemiological data survey undertaken in 2010-2011. Results. It was evidenced that there was a reduction of intestinal parasites and that there were improvements in the socioenvironmental conditions between the two decades evaluated. It was observed that, in the period 1992-1996, playing out in the streets was associated with a higher risk for acquiring intestinal parasites. Over the 2010-2011 period, the characteristics of more than five residents per household, houses with dirt floors, children who live in homes without piped water, and children who play out in the streets were associated with a higher risk of intestinal parasitic infection. Conclusion. The study showed a reduction of intestinal parasitic diseases to 23.8% in 2010-2011 from 81.3% in 1992-1996 and improvement of the social-sanitary conditions of the population between the decades analyzed.

References

  1. Health Place. 2009 Mar;15(1):107-16 - PubMed
  2. J Trop Pediatr. 2009 Feb;55(1):42-5 - PubMed
  3. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005 Sep-Oct;38(5):402-5 - PubMed
  4. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):263-8 - PubMed
  5. Trop Biomed. 2011 Apr;28(1):188-93 - PubMed
  6. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Feb 02;4(2):e588 - PubMed
  7. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;37(4):831-40 - PubMed
  8. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004 Sep;35(3):506-11 - PubMed
  9. Trop Med Int Health. 2006 Dec;11(12):1813-20 - PubMed
  10. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Sep 30;9(9):e0004111 - PubMed
  11. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Nov;118(11):1637-42 - PubMed
  12. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Apr;92(4):794-6 - PubMed
  13. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2008 Jan-Feb;50(1):57-9 - PubMed
  14. Adv Parasitol. 2006;62:221-61 - PubMed
  15. Parasit Vectors. 2011 Dec 30;4:242 - PubMed
  16. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45939 - PubMed
  17. Trop Biomed. 2014 Sep;31(3):525-33 - PubMed
  18. Parasit Vectors. 2015 Aug 07;8:412 - PubMed
  19. Int J Parasitol. 2011 Sep;41(11):1165-73 - PubMed
  20. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 19;10:21 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 2007 Nov 10;370(9599):1622-8 - PubMed
  22. Acta Trop. 2014 Mar;131:63-70 - PubMed
  23. N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 6;357(10):1018-27 - PubMed
  24. Cad Saude Publica. 2010 Jan;26(1):143-52 - PubMed

Publication Types