Display options
Share it on

J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2015 Dec 21;9:9. doi: 10.1186/s13032-015-0030-5. eCollection 2015.

"Anterior convergent" chest probing in rapid ultrasound transducer positioning versus formal chest ultrasonography to detect pneumothorax during the primary survey of hospital trauma patients: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Journal of trauma management & outcomes

Behrad Ziapour, Houman Seyedjavady Haji

Affiliations

  1. Emergency Department of Imam Khomeyni Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran.
  2. Internal Medicine, St. Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA USA.

PMID: 26697105 PMCID: PMC4687371 DOI: 10.1186/s13032-015-0030-5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occult pneumothorax represents a diagnostic pitfall during the primary survey of trauma patients, particularly if these patients require early positive pressure ventilation. This study investigated the accuracy of our proposed rapid model of ultrasound transducer positioning during the primary survey of trauma patients after their arrival at the hospital.

METHODS: This diagnostic trial was conducted over 12 months and was based on the results of 84 ultrasound (US) exams performed on patients with severe multiple trauma. Our index test (US) was used to detect pneumothorax in four pre-defined locations on the anterior of each hemi-thorax using the "Anterior Convergent" approach, and its performance was limited to the primary survey. Consecutively, patients underwent chest-computed tomography (CT) with or without chest radiography. The diagnostic findings of both chest radiography and chest ultrasounds were compared to the gold-standard test (CT).

RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity was 78 % for US and 36.4 % for chest radiography (p < 0.001); the specificity was 92 % for US and 98 % for chest radiography (not significant); the positive predictive values were 74 % for US and 80 % for chest radiography (not significant); the negative predictive values were 94 % for US and 87 % for chest radiography (not significant); the positive likelihood ratio was 10 for US and 18 for chest radiography (p = 0.007); and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.25 for US and 0.65 for chest radiography (p = 0.001). The mean required time for performing the new method was 64 ± 10 s. An absence of the expected diffused dynamic view among ultrasound images obtained from patients with pneumothorax was also observed. We designated this phenomenon "Gestalt Lung Recession."

CONCLUSIONS: "Anterior convergent" chest US probing represents a brief but efficient model that provides clinicians a safe and accurate exam and adequate resuscitation during critical minutes of the primary survey without interrupting other medical staff activities taking place around the trauma patient. The use of the new concept of "Gestalt Lung Recession" instead of the absence of "lung sliding" might improve the specificity of US in detecting pneumothorax.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Pneumothorax; Primary survey; Sensitivity and specificity; Transducer positioning; Ultrasonography

References

  1. J Thorac Imaging. 1987 Apr;2(2):76-8 - PubMed
  2. Intensive Care Med. 1999 Apr;25(4):383-8 - PubMed
  3. Chest. 1995 Nov;108(5):1345-8 - PubMed
  4. J Trauma. 2001 Feb;50(2):201-5 - PubMed
  5. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;10 (1):91-4 - PubMed
  6. Crit Care. 2006;10 (4):R112 - PubMed
  7. Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Oct-Dec;17 (5-6):418-9 - PubMed
  8. Ann Intern Med. 1981 Apr;94(4 Pt 2):557-92 - PubMed
  9. Biometrics. 2003 Dec;59(4):849-58 - PubMed
  10. Crit Care. 2007;11(1):205 - PubMed
  11. J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):288-95 - PubMed
  12. Am Surg. 2001 Mar;67(3):232-5; discussion 235-6 - PubMed
  13. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1385-8, table of contents - PubMed
  14. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10 ):1434-40 - PubMed
  15. Surg Clin North Am. 1989 Feb;69(1):15-9 - PubMed
  16. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Feb;44(1):44-9 - PubMed
  17. J Ultrasound Med. 2002 Sep;21(9):1060; author reply 1060-2 - PubMed
  18. Eur J Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;15(4):238-41 - PubMed
  19. Acta Astronaut. 2005 May-Jun;56(9-12):831-8 - PubMed
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jan 12;9:3 - PubMed
  21. Prax Pneumol. 1975 Dec;29(12):722-6 - PubMed
  22. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006 Jun;27(3):226-30 - PubMed
  23. Intensive Care Med. 1998 Dec;24(12 ):1331-4 - PubMed
  24. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993 May;21(4):245-50 - PubMed
  25. Vet Clin Pathol. 2006 Mar;35(1):8-17 - PubMed
  26. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;53(4):550-70 - PubMed
  27. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Oct;88(6):535-9 - PubMed
  28. Emerg Med J. 2009 Jun;26(6):434-5 - PubMed
  29. Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;27(3):363-5 - PubMed
  30. Crit Care Med. 2005 Jun;33(6):1231-8 - PubMed
  31. Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):569-72; discussion 572-3 - PubMed
  32. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Sep;12 (9):844-9 - PubMed
  33. J Trauma. 2002 Apr;52(4):769-71 - PubMed
  34. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008 Jan;1(1):34-41 - PubMed
  35. Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Oct-Dec;17 (5-6):488-93 - PubMed
  36. Thorax. 1983 May;38(5):326-32 - PubMed
  37. J Trauma. 2001 Oct;51(4):677-82 - PubMed
  38. Chest. 2002 Nov;122(5):1759-73 - PubMed

Publication Types