Display options
Share it on

Front Pharmacol. 2015 Nov 23;6:274. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00274. eCollection 2015.

Antimicrobial, Anthelmintic Activities and Characterisation of Functional Phenolic Acids of Achyranthes aspera Linn.: A Medicinal Plant Used for the Treatment of Wounds and Ringworm in East Africa.

Frontiers in pharmacology

Ashwell R Ndhlala, Habteab M Ghebrehiwot, Bhekumthetho Ncube, Adeyemi O Aremu, Jiří Gruz, Michaela Šubrtová, Karel Doležal, Christian P du Plooy, Hafiz A Abdelgadir, Johannes Van Staden

Affiliations

  1. Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa ; Vegetable and Ornamental Plants, Agricultural Research Council Pretoria, South Africa.
  2. Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa ; African Centre for Crop Improvement, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
  3. Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
  4. Department of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palack? University and Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic.
  5. Vegetable and Ornamental Plants, Agricultural Research Council Pretoria, South Africa.

PMID: 26635604 PMCID: PMC4655238 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00274

Abstract

Achyranthes aspera Linn. (Amaranthaceae) commonly known as Prickly Chaff flower (English) is traditionally used for treating a number of ailments. Different parts of the plant are used in treating wounds and ringworm in East Africa and elsewhere for a number of ailments. In this study, leaf extracts of A. aspera collected from two different geographical locations (Ciaat, Eritrea and Ukulinga, South Africa) were evaluated for antibacterial, antifungal, anthelmintic activities and the plant characterized for functional phenolic acids as well as protein binding capacity. The pathogens used in the tests were, two Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae), two Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus), a filamentus yeast-like fungus (Candida albicans) and a free-living nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans). The water and acetone extracts of the samples collected from Ciaat exhibited good antibacterial, antifungal and anthelmintic activity (MIC < 1 mg/ml) except the water extract against E. coli which showed moderate activity. In contrast, the extracts collected from Ukulinga exhibited moderate to weak activities except for the acetone (aq.) extracts which had good activity against some of the tested organisms. UHPLC-MS/MS revealed variation in the levels of some functional phenolic compounds, with rutin, chlorogenic acid and genistein not being detected in the extracts from Ukulinga. The variation was also observed in the protein binding capacity, which could offer a predictive wound healing model. All extracts from plant samples collected at Ciaat expressed significant dominant potency compared to similar extracts from Ukulinga.

Keywords: Amaranthaceae; chlorogenic acid; genistein; protein binding; rutin; taxifolin; wound healing

References

  1. Phytother Res. 2008 Sep;22(9):1200-7 - PubMed
  2. Vet Parasitol. 2011 Dec 15;182(2-4):264-8 - PubMed
  3. Front Pharmacol. 2013 Jul 25;4:92 - PubMed
  4. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001 Apr;75(1):45-50 - PubMed
  5. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2405-15 - PubMed
  6. Molecules. 2015 Jul 13;20(7):12698-731 - PubMed
  7. Science. 2010 Apr 9;328(5975):165-7 - PubMed
  8. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Jun 30;15:203 - PubMed
  9. J Ethnopharmacol. 1997 Mar;56(1):81-7 - PubMed
  10. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Aug 30;143(1):185-93 - PubMed
  11. J Med Microbiol. 1988 Mar;25(3):157-65 - PubMed
  12. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009 Feb 25;122(1):117-22 - PubMed
  13. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008 Oct 28;119(3):462-72 - PubMed
  14. Planta Med. 1998 Dec;64(8):711-3 - PubMed
  15. Parasitol Int. 2003 Jun;52(2):179-83 - PubMed
  16. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002 Nov;83(1-2):3-12 - PubMed
  17. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Oct;78(4):728-33 - PubMed
  18. Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Oct;15(8):743-57 - PubMed
  19. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001 Jun;76(1):87-91 - PubMed
  20. Parasitol Int. 2006 Mar;55(1):17-21 - PubMed
  21. Phytomedicine. 2011 Aug 15;18(11):990-3 - PubMed
  22. Science. 1982 Oct 1;218(4567):19-27 - PubMed
  23. Parasitol Res. 2007 Sep;101(4):975-80 - PubMed
  24. Carcinogenesis. 2006 Feb;27(2):269-77 - PubMed
  25. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2007 Dec;144(6):791-4 - PubMed
  26. Z Naturforsch C. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(9-10):731-42 - PubMed

Publication Types