Front Physiol. 2015 Nov 23;6:331. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00331. eCollection 2015.

Effect of Three Different Grip Angles on Physiological Parameters During Laboratory Handcycling Test in Able-Bodied Participants.

Frontiers in physiology

Thomas Abel, Brendan Burkett, Barbara Thees, Stefan Schneider, Christopher D Askew, Heiko K Strüder

PMID: 26635617 PMCID: PMC4655231 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00331

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Handcycling is a relatively new wheelchair sport that has gained increased popularity for people with lower limb disabilities. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of three different grip positions on physical parameters during handcycling in a laboratory setting.

METHODS: Twenty one able-bodied participants performed three maximum incremental handcycling tests until exhaustion, each with a different grip angle. The angle between the grip and the crank was randomly set at 90° (horizontal), 0° (vertical), or 10° (diagonal). The initial load was 20 W and increased by 20 W each 5 min. In addition, participants performed a 20 s maximum effort.

RESULTS: The relative peak functional performance (W/kg), peak heart rate (bpm), associated lactate concentrations (mmol/l) and peak oxygen uptake per kilogram body weight (ml.min(-1).kg(-1)) for the different grip positions during the stage test were: (a) Horizontal: 1.43 ± 0.21 W/kg, 170.14 ± 12.81 bpm, 9.54 ± 1.93 mmol/l, 30.86 ± 4.57 ml/kg; (b) Vertical: 1.38 ± 0.20 W/kg, 171.81 ± 13.87 bpm, 9.91 ± 2.29 mmol/l, 29.75 ± 5.13 ml/kg; (c) Diagonal: 1.40 ± 0.22 W/kg, 169.19 ± 13.31 bpm, 9.34 ± 2.36 mmol/l, 29.39 ± 4.70 ml/kg. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences could only be found for lactate concentration between the vertical grip position and the other grips during submaximal handcycling.

CONCLUSION: The orientation of three different grip angles made no difference to the peak load achieved during an incremental handcycling test and a 20 s maximum effort. At submaximal load, higher lactate concentrations were found when the vertical grip position was used, suggesting that this position may be less efficient than the alternative diagonal or horizontal grip positions.

Keywords: adapted physical activity; biomechanics; spinal cord injury

References

1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;72(1-2):111-4 - PubMed
2. Spinal Cord. 1999 Aug;37(8):569-74 - PubMed
3. Spinal Cord. 2006 Apr;44(4):211-6 - PubMed
4. Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(13):1097-103 - PubMed
5. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Mar;38(1):61-7 - PubMed
6. Med Eng Phys. 2006 Nov;28(9):905-15 - PubMed
7. Med Eng Phys. 2008 Jun;30(5):574-80 - PubMed
8. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Apr;24(2):386-94 - PubMed
9. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Jan;88(4-5):317-38 - PubMed
10. Appl Ergon. 2006 Nov;37(6):737-42 - PubMed
11. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003 Oct;10(5):371-6 - PubMed
12. J Sports Sci. 2007 Feb 15;25(4):453-60 - PubMed
13. Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):65-71 - PubMed
14. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Nov;10(8):965-71 - PubMed
15. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(1):109-16 - PubMed
16. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Jul;106(5):749-57 - PubMed
17. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 May;84(5):413-8 - PubMed
18. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(1):81-6 - PubMed
19. Int J Sports Med. 1985 Jun;6(3):117-30 - PubMed
20. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Oct;36(10):1826-31 - PubMed
21. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001 Aug;11(4):291-8 - PubMed
22. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jan;102(2):189-94 - PubMed
23. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(9):1295-302 - PubMed
24. Ergonomics. 2009 Mar;52(3):345-61 - PubMed
25. Spinal Cord. 2014 Jun;52(6):455-61 - PubMed
26. Int J Sports Med. 2004 Nov;25(8):622-6 - PubMed
27. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Jun;82(3):245-9 - PubMed
28. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Aug;40(8):684-7 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article