Display options
Share it on

Epilepsy Res Treat. 2015;2015:675071. doi: 10.1155/2015/675071. Epub 2015 Dec 07.

Bridging the Gap between Evidence and Practice for Adults with Medically Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Is a Change in Funding Policy Needed to Stimulate a Shift in Practice?.

Epilepsy research and treatment

Alireza Mansouri, Abdulrahman Aldakkan, Magda J Kosicka, Jean-Eric Tarride, Taufik A Valiante

Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8P 1H1.
  2. Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Division of Neurosurgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  3. Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
  4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8P 1H1.
  5. Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Fundamental Neurobiology, Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Krembil Neuroscience Center, Toronto, Canada.

PMID: 26770822 PMCID: PMC4685103 DOI: 10.1155/2015/675071

Abstract

Objective. Surgery for medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) in adults has been shown to be effective but underutilized. Comprehensive health economic evaluations of surgery compared with continued medical management are limited. Policy changes may be necessary to influence practice shift. Methods. A critical review of the literature on health economic analyses for adults with MRE was conducted. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CRD, and EconLit databases were searched using relevant subject headings and keywords pertaining to adults, epilepsy, and health economic evaluations. The screening was conducted independently and in duplicate. Results. Four studies were identified (1 Canadian, 2 American, and 1 French). Two were cost-utility analyses and 2 were cost-effectiveness evaluations. Only one was conducted after the effectiveness of surgery was established through a randomized trial. All suggested surgery to be favorable in the medium to long term (7-8 years and beyond). The reduction of medication use was the major cost-saving parameter in favor of surgery. Conclusions. Although updated evaluations that are more generalizable across settings are necessary, surgery appears to be a favorable option from a health economic perspective. Given the limited success of knowledge translation endeavours, funder-level policy changes such as quality-based purchasing may be necessary to induce a shift in practice.

References

  1. Epilepsia. 1996 Jul;37(7):651-6 - PubMed
  2. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):926-32 - PubMed
  3. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Feb;29(2):59-65 - PubMed
  4. Lancet Neurol. 2002 Oct;1(6):375-82 - PubMed
  5. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2012;12(17):1-28 - PubMed
  6. Epilepsia. 2004 Dec;45(12):1623-9 - PubMed
  7. Neurology. 2010 Aug 24;75(8):699-704 - PubMed
  8. Epilepsia. 2002 Feb;43(2):170-4 - PubMed
  9. Epilepsy Res. 2013 Dec;107(3):286-96 - PubMed
  10. J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10 - PubMed
  11. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):622-31 - PubMed
  12. Epilepsia. 1999;40 Suppl 8:44-7 - PubMed
  13. N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 19;339(21):1516-21 - PubMed
  14. Health Econ. 2014 Aug;23(8):962-78 - PubMed
  15. World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):e375-6 - PubMed
  16. Epilepsy Res. 1994 Jul;18(3):249-60 - PubMed
  17. Seizure. 2010 May;19(4):253-5 - PubMed
  18. Epilepsia. 2002;43 Suppl 6:9-11 - PubMed
  19. Neurology. 2011 Jan 4;76(1):94-9 - PubMed
  20. Epilepsy Behav. 2008 Jul;13(1):96-101 - PubMed
  21. Epilepsy Res. 2001 Dec;47(3):205-15 - PubMed
  22. Epilepsia. 2015 Mar;56(3):359-65 - PubMed
  23. Epilepsia. 1996 Sep;37(9):807-13 - PubMed
  24. Epilepsy Res. 2009 Oct;86(2-3):224-7 - PubMed
  25. Epilepsia. 1998 Feb;39(2):213-31 - PubMed
  26. J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1089-97 - PubMed
  27. Epilepsia. 1997 Feb;38(2):154-63 - PubMed
  28. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):368-78 - PubMed
  29. Epilepsia. 1994 Nov-Dec;35(6):1230-43 - PubMed
  30. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Apr;21(2):179-83 - PubMed
  31. Neurology. 2003 Jan 28;60(2):186-90 - PubMed
  32. Epilepsy Res. 2011 Mar;94(1-2):61-8 - PubMed
  33. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Apr;17(4):619-25 - PubMed
  34. JAMA. 2012 Mar 7;307(9):922-30 - PubMed
  35. CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):473-81 - PubMed
  36. JAMA. 1990 Aug 8;264(6):729-33 - PubMed
  37. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2012;12(18):1-41 - PubMed
  38. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):515-7 - PubMed
  39. Epilepsia. 2000;41 Suppl 4:S31-4 - PubMed
  40. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 2;345(5):311-8 - PubMed
  41. CNS Spectr. 2004 Feb;9(2):98-101, 106-9 - PubMed
  42. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;63(1):52-8 - PubMed
  43. Neurology. 2013 Apr 30;80(18):1669-76 - PubMed
  44. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jul;87(1):20-8 - PubMed
  45. Epilepsia. 2010 Jun;51(6):1069-77 - PubMed
  46. Epilepsia. 2000 Mar;41(3):342-51 - PubMed
  47. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun;25(6):613-8 - PubMed
  48. N Engl J Med. 2001 Apr 5;344(14):1087-92 - PubMed
  49. Neurochirurgie. 2008 May;54(3):484-98 - PubMed
  50. Epilepsia. 2002;43 Suppl 4:25-31 - PubMed
  51. Epilepsia. 2012 Jan;53(1):35-43 - PubMed
  52. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w262-71 - PubMed
  53. Epilepsia. 2004;45 Suppl 6:3-12 - PubMed
  54. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49 Suppl 1:33-6 - PubMed
  55. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2004 Jun;160 Spec No 1:5S354-67 - PubMed
  56. Epilepsia. 2000;41 Suppl 4:S35-40 - PubMed

Publication Types