Display options
Share it on

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 22;9:680. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00680. eCollection 2015.

Visual Search in the Real World: Color Vision Deficiency Affects Peripheral Guidance, but Leaves Foveal Verification Largely Unaffected.

Frontiers in human neuroscience

Günter Kugler, Bernard M 't Hart, Stefan Kohlbecher, Klaus Bartl, Frank Schumann, Wolfgang Einhäuser, Erich Schneider

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, University of MunichMunich, Germany; German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University of MunichMunich, Germany.
  2. Neurophysics, Philipps University MarburgMarburg, Germany; Centre for Vision Research, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada.
  3. Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris DescartesParis, France; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of OsnabrückOsnabrück, Germany.
  4. Neurophysics, Philipps University MarburgMarburg, Germany; Institute of Physics, Chemnitz University of TechnologyChemnitz, Germany.
  5. Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, University of MunichMunich, Germany; German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University of MunichMunich, Germany; Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus - SenftenbergSenftenberg, Germany.

PMID: 26733851 PMCID: PMC4686840 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00680

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with color vision deficiencies report numerous limitations in daily life, restricting, for example, their access to some professions. However, they use basic color terms systematically and in a similar manner as people with normal color vision. We hypothesize that a possible explanation for this discrepancy between color perception and behavioral consequences might be found in the gaze behavior of people with color vision deficiency.

METHODS: A group of participants with color vision deficiencies and a control group performed several search tasks in a naturalistic setting on a lawn. All participants wore a mobile eye-tracking-driven camera with a high foveal image resolution (EyeSeeCam). Search performance as well as fixations of objects of different colors were examined.

RESULTS: Search performance was similar in both groups in a color-unrelated search task as well as in a search for yellow targets. While searching for red targets, participants with color vision deficiencies exhibited a strongly degraded performance. This was closely matched by the number of fixations on red objects shown by the two groups. Importantly, once they fixated a target, participants with color vision deficiencies exhibited only few identification errors.

CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to controls, participants with color vision deficiencies are not able to enhance their search for red targets on a (green) lawn by an efficient guiding mechanism. The data indicate that the impaired guiding is the main influence on search performance, while foveal identification (verification) is largely unaffected by the color vision deficiency.

Keywords: color vision; color vision deficiency; deuteranomaly; eye tracker; gaze behavior; real world behavior; visual perception; visual search

References

  1. Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(4):219-27 - PubMed
  2. Nat Methods. 2010 Oct;7(10):775; discussion 775 - PubMed
  3. Curr Biol. 2010 Apr 27;20(8):R346-9 - PubMed
  4. Clin Exp Optom. 2004 Jul;87(4-5):258-75 - PubMed
  5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 May;1164:461-7 - PubMed
  6. J Physiol. 1984 Dec;357:241-65 - PubMed
  7. Hum Factors. 2003 Fall;45(3):495-503 - PubMed
  8. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 12;364(1531):2957-67 - PubMed
  9. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):419-33 - PubMed
  10. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Sep;182(3):343-56 - PubMed
  11. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Dec;86(12):1408-11 - PubMed
  12. Clin Exp Optom. 2004 Jul;87(4-5):294-304 - PubMed
  13. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1967;27:355-60 - PubMed
  14. Nature. 1995 Jul 13;376(6536):127-8 - PubMed
  15. J Vis. 2009 Oct 06;9(11):8.1-13 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Biol. 1989 Sep;146:21-38 - PubMed
  17. Clin Exp Optom. 2010 Jan;93(1):39-41 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2007 Feb 8;445(7128):593 - PubMed
  19. Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):147 - PubMed
  20. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Apr 08;5:36 - PubMed
  21. Vision Res. 2004 Nov;44(24):2843-55 - PubMed
  22. Hum Factors. 2002 Winter;44(4):665-75 - PubMed
  23. Clin Exp Optom. 2006 May;89(3):144-9 - PubMed
  24. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;77(2):278 - PubMed
  25. Optom Vis Sci. 1989 May;66(5):288-95 - PubMed
  26. Vis Neurosci. 2009 Jan-Feb;26(1):35-49 - PubMed

Publication Types