Display options
Cite
Islam S, Hirayama T, Islam A, et al. Treatment referral system for tuberculosis patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Public Health Action. 2015;5(4):236-40doi: 10.5588/pha.15.0052.
Islam, S., Hirayama, T., Islam, A., Ishikawa, N., & Afsana, K. (2015). Treatment referral system for tuberculosis patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Public health action, 5(4), 236-40. https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.15.0052
Islam, S, et al. "Treatment referral system for tuberculosis patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh." Public health action vol. 5,4 (2015): 236-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.15.0052
Islam S, Hirayama T, Islam A, Ishikawa N, Afsana K. Treatment referral system for tuberculosis patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Public Health Action. 2015 Dec 21;5(4):236-40. doi: 10.5588/pha.15.0052. PMID: 26767176; PMCID: PMC4682614.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Public Health Action. 2015 Dec 21;5(4):236-40. doi: 10.5588/pha.15.0052.

Treatment referral system for tuberculosis patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Public health action

S Islam, T Hirayama, A Islam, N Ishikawa, K Afsana

Affiliations

  1. Tuberculosis Control Programme, BRAC, BRAC Centre, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
  2. Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan.

PMID: 26767176 PMCID: PMC4682614 DOI: 10.5588/pha.15.0052

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the referral system in an urban DOTS-based programme in Dhaka, Bangladesh, including the peri-urban area, and to identify opportunities to strengthen the system.

DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study in which diagnosed tuberculosis (TB) patients and health providers from DOTS centres were interviewed. Research tools included pre-tested structured questionnaires and the TB patients' referral records.

RESULTS: Of 4974 TB patients who were referred to the different treatment centres, only 1756 (35%) of the counterfoils of the referral slips were returned. Of 250 patients randomly selected for interview, 165 reported to a DOTS centre, 69 did not and 16 could not be traced. Variations in educational qualification, residence and the identification of DOTS centres after counselling were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Lower monthly income (RR = 7.84, RR = 5.03), distance from the centre (RR = 36.21) and those receiving treatment from pharmacies (RR = 3) or non-governmental organisations (RR = 28.48) have more risk of irregular treatment.

CONCLUSION: A high proportion of referred patients were registered and initiated treatment, but many did not report to the referral treatment centre. Proper counselling and taking into account the patients' preferences during referral are essential to address access barriers to treatment adherence and improved treatment outcome.

Keywords: DOTS centre; counselling; diagnostic centre; referral linkage

References

  1. J Infect Dis. 2007 Dec 1;196 Suppl 3:S505-11 - PubMed
  2. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011 May;15(5):647-51 - PubMed
  3. BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 18;2(6):null - PubMed
  4. Health Res Policy Syst. 2007 Feb 26;5:1 - PubMed
  5. Hum Resour Health. 2011 Jan 22;9:3 - PubMed

Publication Types