Display options
Share it on

Int J Biomater. 2015;2015:921425. doi: 10.1155/2015/921425. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

Effect of Bleaching and Thermocycling on Resin-Enamel Bond Strength.

International journal of biomaterials

Horieh Moosavi, Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour, Marjaneh Ghavamnasiri, Sanaz Alizadeh

Affiliations

  1. Dental Materials Research Center and Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 91735, Iran.
  2. Dental Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 91735, Iran.

PMID: 26839550 PMCID: PMC4709641 DOI: 10.1155/2015/921425

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bleaching and thermocycling on microshear bond strength of bonded resin composites to enamel. Enamel slices were prepared from ninety-six intact human premolars and resin composite cylinders were bonded by using Adper Single Bond 2 + Filtek Z350 or Filtek silorane adhesive and resin composite. Each essential group was randomly subdivided to two subgroups: control and bleaching. In bleaching group, 35% hydrogen peroxide was applied on samples. Thermocycling procedure was conducted between 5°C and 55°C, for 3.000 cycles on the half of each subgroup specimen. Then microshear bond strength was tested. Methacrylate-based resin composite had higher bond strength than silorane-based one. The meyhacrylate-based group without bleaching along with thermocycling showed the most bond strength, while bleaching with 35% carbamide peroxide on silorane-based group without thermocycling showed the least microshear bond strength. Bleaching caused a significant degradation on shear bond strength of silorane-based resin composites that bonded using self-etch adhesive resin systems.

References

  1. Dent Mater. 2008 Aug;24(8):1050-7 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Apr 01;7(2):e243-9 - PubMed
  3. Oper Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):390-6 - PubMed
  4. Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):412-9 - PubMed
  5. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Mar;19(2):245-51 - PubMed
  6. J Dent. 1990 Oct;18(5):263-70 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Dent. 2007 Oct;1(4):230-5 - PubMed
  8. Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):15-9 - PubMed
  9. J Can Dent Assoc. 2011;77:b59 - PubMed
  10. Dent Mater. 2006 Dec;22(12):1103-8 - PubMed
  11. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Nov 01;10(6):E009-16 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Dent. 2008;19(1):33-6 - PubMed
  13. J Dent. 2004;32 Suppl 1:35-9 - PubMed
  14. J Endod. 2000 Feb;26(2):92-4 - PubMed
  15. Dent Mater J. 2008 Mar;27(2):300-9 - PubMed
  16. Am J Dent. 2007 Oct;20(5):329-34 - PubMed
  17. Oper Dent. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):217-22 - PubMed
  18. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(5):273-8; discussion 279 - PubMed
  19. Aust Dent J. 2006 Sep;51(3):252-7 - PubMed
  20. Braz Oral Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;22(1):84-9 - PubMed
  21. Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):188-92 - PubMed
  22. Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):852-61 - PubMed
  23. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(6):538-42 - PubMed
  24. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Oct;23(5):324-35 - PubMed
  25. Oper Dent. 2005 May-Jun;30(3):297-303 - PubMed
  26. Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e38-49 - PubMed
  27. J Prosthodont. 2010 Apr;19(3):218-25 - PubMed
  28. Oper Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):463-9 - PubMed
  29. Dent Mater. 2009 May;25(5):589-600 - PubMed
  30. Dent Mater. 2009 Jun;25(6):810-9 - PubMed
  31. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 May;27(5):428-31 - PubMed
  32. J Oral Sci. 2015 Jun;57(2):137-43 - PubMed
  33. J Adhes Dent. 2003 Fall;5(3):175-82 - PubMed
  34. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:295-308 - PubMed
  35. Am J Dent. 1992 Apr;5(2):109-12 - PubMed

Publication Types