Display options
Share it on

Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Jan 14;4(1):2325967115626412. doi: 10.1177/2325967115626412. eCollection 2016 Jan.

Fatigue Alters Landing Shock Attenuation During a Single-Leg Vertical Drop Jump.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

Akihiro Tamura, Kiyokazu Akasaka, Takahiro Otsudo, Yutaka Sawada, Yu Okubo, Jyunya Shiozawa, Yuka Toda, Kaori Yamada

Affiliations

  1. Saitama Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan.
  2. Saitama Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan.; Saitama Medical University, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan.
  3. Saitama Medical University, Moroyama, Saitama, Japan.
  4. Department of Rehabilitation, Zenshukai Hospital, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
  5. Department of Rehabilitation, Yokohama Asahi Center General Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
  6. Department of Rehabilitation, Kanetsu Hospital, Tsurugashima, Saitama, Japan.

PMID: 26811843 PMCID: PMC4716402 DOI: 10.1177/2325967115626412

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Landings in fatigue conditions are considered to be one of the factors that cause noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Additionally, it is known that fatigue alters lower extremity landing strategies and decreases the ability to attenuate shock during landing.

PURPOSE: To determine characteristics of knee kinematics and shock attenuation during the landing phase of a single-leg vertical drop jump in a fatigued condition. The hypothesis was that knee kinematics during the landing phase of a single-leg vertical drop jump would demonstrate a significant difference between before and after fatigue.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS: Thirty-four college females participated in this experiment. They were randomly assigned to either the fatigue (n = 17) or control group (n = 17). The fatigue group performed the single-leg vertical drop jump before and after the fatigue protocol, which was performed on a bike ergometer. Knee kinematics data were obtained from the 3-dimensional motion analysis system. The ratio of each variable (%) was calculated, comparing the pre- to postfatigue protocol. Unpaired t tests were used to compare changes in kinematic variables between the fatigue-induced group and control group.

RESULTS: Peak knee flexion angular velocity increased significantly in the fatigue group (106.1% ± 8.0%) in comparison with the control group (100.7% ± 6.6%) (P < .05). However, peak knee flexion angle and acceleration had no differences between each group. Peak knee adduction/abduction angle, velocity, and acceleration also had no differences between each group.

CONCLUSION: Fatigue decreased the ability to attenuate shock by increasing angular velocity in the direction of knee flexion during single-leg drop jump landing. These findings indicate the need to evaluate the ability to attenuate shock by measuring knee flexion angular velocity when fatigue is considered.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Measuring knee angular velocity during landings might be an important evaluation parameter in the consideration of the knee injury prevention.

Keywords: angular velocity; kinematics; knee injury prevention; lower extremity

References

  1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Jun;34(6):998-1002 - PubMed
  2. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;28(5):659-62 - PubMed
  3. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;27(6):699-706 - PubMed
  4. J Biomech Eng. 1995 Aug;117(3):309-18 - PubMed
  5. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81 - PubMed
  6. J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Dec 01;9(4):669-75 - PubMed
  7. Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1068-74 - PubMed
  8. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Oct;25(8):781-8 - PubMed
  9. Orthopedics. 2000 Jun;23 (6):573-8 - PubMed
  10. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 May;36(5):832-7 - PubMed
  11. J Athl Train. 2004 Jun;39(2):156-161 - PubMed
  12. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003 Oct;13(5):491-8 - PubMed
  13. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):554-65 - PubMed
  14. J Athl Train. 2004 Dec;39(4):352-364 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):359-67 - PubMed
  16. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Aug;38(4):466-71 - PubMed
  17. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Oct;38(10):1836-42 - PubMed
  18. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Apr;16(4):400-7 - PubMed
  19. Br J Sports Med. 1999 Jun;33(3):196-203 - PubMed
  20. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(6):356-63 - PubMed
  21. J Athl Train. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):76-83 - PubMed
  22. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):524-30 - PubMed
  23. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Mar;39(3):502-14 - PubMed
  24. J Biomech. 2013 Apr 26;46(7):1237-41 - PubMed
  25. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Feb;19(1):55-64 - PubMed
  26. Gait Posture. 2011 Mar;33(3):452-6 - PubMed
  27. Br J Sports Med. 2001 Feb;35(1):43-7 - PubMed
  28. BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):449 - PubMed
  29. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Mar;13(2):71-8 - PubMed
  30. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;43(6):417-22 - PubMed
  31. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;33(7):1022-9 - PubMed
  32. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):252-9 - PubMed
  33. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000 May-Jun;8(3):141-50 - PubMed
  34. Knee. 2005 Apr;12 (2):129-34 - PubMed
  35. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1998 Oct;13(7):515-520 - PubMed
  36. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jun;32(4):1002-12 - PubMed

Publication Types