Display options
Share it on

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Oct;39(5):517-22. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0316-0. Epub 2013 Aug 10.

Does ATLS trauma training fit into Western countries: evaluation of the first 8 years of ATLS in Germany.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society

M Muenzberg, T Paffrath, G Matthes, L Mahlke, B Swartman, M Hoffman, R Lefering, C G Wölfl

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
  2. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Cologne Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
  3. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Berlin, Warener Straße 7, 12683, Berlinv, Germany.
  4. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, St. Vincenz Hospital Paderborn, Am Busdorf 2, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
  5. Institution for Didactics and Education Sciences in Health Care, University Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
  6. Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, Haus 38, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
  7. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany. [email protected].

PMID: 26815450 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0316-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With over 2 million certified physicians worldwide, the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program is one of the most successful international medical education programs. Germany joined the ATLS program in 2003. Before implementation of the program, there was a controversial discussion as to whether a country like Germany with a long history of trauma care needed ATLS at all. 197 courses with nearly 3,000 providers were performed until December 2010.

AIM: We assessed the course evaluations since the implementation of ATLS in Germany using the participants' systematic feedback.

METHOD: During the course, each participant evaluated each presentation, skill station, and simulation on a rating scale from 1 to 4 (1 being the best, 4 being the worst). The participants completed the evaluation forms during the course and before they received their results. The course coordinator made sure that all forms were returned. The feedback forms were collected anonymously and were entered into a database. Statistical analysis was performed using frequencies and mean values.

RESULTS: The cumulative evaluation of all courses revealed an average performance score of 1.39 (1.06-1.86; n = 197). The lectures, skill stations, and simulations were individually evaluated as follows: lectures 1.61 (1.00-2.81; n = 197), skill stations 1.40 (1.00-2.40; n = 197), and surgical skill stations 1.35 (1.00-2.38; n = 197). Practical skills simulation (case scenarios) received the highest grade of 1.24 (1.00-1.57; n = 197). There were no significant changes during the time concerning the results of the evaluation.

CONCLUSION: The overall assessment showed constantly good and excellent evaluations by the participants over the years. In general, skill stations and simulations performed better than lectures. According to these results, the course format is well accepted by the participants and, therefore, can be recommended to all physicians treating trauma patients. Our results also underline the value of such a course format in an industrial country with an already established trauma system.

Keywords: ATLS; Golden hour; Polytrauma; Trauma management; Trauma training

References

  1. Resuscitation. 2001 Jan;48(1):47-56 - PubMed
  2. Unfallchirurg. 2002 Nov;105(11):1027-32 - PubMed
  3. Unfallchirurg. 2009 Oct;112(10):846-53 - PubMed
  4. Unfallchirurg. 1997 Nov;100(11):859-66 - PubMed
  5. Am Surg. 1991 Dec;57(12):737-46 - PubMed
  6. Med Educ. 1994 Nov;28(6):524-7 - PubMed
  7. Injury. 2008 Jun;39(6):681-5 - PubMed
  8. J Trauma. 1993 Jun;34(6):890-8; discussion 898-9 - PubMed
  9. Am J Surg. 1999 Feb;177(2):167-70 - PubMed
  10. Unfallchirurg. 2008 Sep;111(9):688-94 - PubMed
  11. Anaesthesist. 2007 Nov;56(11):1142-6 - PubMed
  12. Unfallchirurg. 1987 Dec;90(12):529-38 - PubMed
  13. Swiss Surg. 2003;9(6):263-7 - PubMed
  14. Am J Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;22(7):522-5 - PubMed
  15. J Trauma Nurs. 2006 Apr-Jun;13(2):41-4 - PubMed
  16. Emerg Med J. 2001 Jan;18(1):55-8 - PubMed
  17. J Trauma. 1992 Oct;33(4):491-4 - PubMed
  18. J Trauma. 2007 Jun;62(6):1416-20 - PubMed
  19. Arch Surg. 1992 Jun;127(6):721-5; discussion 726 - PubMed
  20. J Trauma. 1993 Jan;34(1):133-8 - PubMed
  21. Anaesthesist. 2007 Nov;56(11):1147-54 - PubMed
  22. J Trauma. 1992 May;32(5):660-5; discussion 665-6 - PubMed
  23. Am J Surg. 2003 Apr;185(4):378-85 - PubMed
  24. Surgeon. 2006 Jun;4(3):163-5 - PubMed
  25. Unfallchirurg. 2004 Oct;107(10):844-50 - PubMed

Publication Types