Display options
Cite
Rundle R, Roberts J, Whitney G, et al. A COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS' KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGING MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(1):115-25
Rundle, R., Roberts, J., Whitney, G., Mankins, S., Dille, C., Donaldson, M., & Hassen, A. (2016). A COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS' KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGING MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. International journal of sports physical therapy, 11(1), 115-25.
Rundle, Ryan, et al. "A COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS' KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGING MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY." International journal of sports physical therapy vol. 11,1 (2016): 115-25.
Rundle R, Roberts J, Whitney G, Mankins S, Dille C, Donaldson M, Hassen A. A COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS' KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGING MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;11(1):115-25. PMID: 26900506; PMCID: PMC4739040.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;11(1):115-25.

A COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PHYSICAL THERAPISTS' KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGING MUSCULOSKELETAL CONDITIONS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY.

International journal of sports physical therapy

Ryan Rundle, Jared Roberts, Gabe Whitney, Steve Mankins, Caleb Dille, Megan Donaldson, Amy Hassen

Affiliations

  1. Walsh University, North Canton, OH, USA.

PMID: 26900506 PMCID: PMC4739040

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Military physical therapists have been shown to have the necessary knowledge in musculoskeletal medicine in order to practice as a direct access provider. However, research about musculoskeletal knowledge in the civilian physical therapist (non-military) population is lacking.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to compare the knowledge in managing musculoskeletal conditions between civilian and military physical therapists using a validated and standardized musculoskeletal competency examination. Furthermore, this study aims to investigate the potential factors that may lead to increased musculoskeletal competency.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, electronic survey.

METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional, electronic survey completed in August and September of 2014 in order to assess licensed physical therapists' knowledge in identifying and managing musculoskeletal conditions. Only physical therapists practicing in orthopedics were permitted to be involved in the study. Descriptive statistics of the participants, and logistic regressions analyzing variables correlated with passing the musculoskeletal exam were calculated using SPSS 22.0. Frequencies were produced for multiple variables. Binary logistic regressions were used to correlate the frequency variables with performing at competency level on the musculoskeletal exam.

RESULTS: A total of 22,750 surveys were sent to physical therapists in Arizona, Ohio, Texas, Maine and Wyoming. Two thousand sixty-five surveys were returned for a response rate of 10.6%. Of the 2,065 surveys completed, 408 responses were included for analysis. The average score for the respondents on the exam was 65.08% and only 28.2% of all respondents met the competency cutoff score (previously established to be 73.1%). Respondents who were orthopedic certified specialists (OCS) or sports certified specialists (SCS) were 3.091 times more likely to perform at the competency level on the examination with a p-value of < 0.001 and a confidence interval >95%.

CONCLUSION: The current study utilized the results from a previous study for a comparison between the civilian and military physical therapist populations. The results indicate that civilian physical therapists in the current study (65.08%) scored lower than their military counterparts in the previous study (75.9%) on the musculoskeletal exam. Potential reasons for this include less autonomous practice responsibilities and a disparity in educational experiences. Board certifications may enhance civilian physical therapists ability to practice with greater autonomy as primary care clinicians when managing musculoskeletal conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Keywords: Board certifications; direct access; musculoskeletal competency

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb;87(2):310-4 - PubMed
  2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005 Jun 17;6:32 - PubMed
  3. Phys Ther. 1997 Jan;77(1):10-8 - PubMed
  4. Phys Ther. 2014 Jan;94(1):14-30 - PubMed
  5. Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Jun;3(3):238-44 - PubMed
  6. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Jun;34(6):284-304 - PubMed
  7. Phys Ther. 2006 Dec;86(12):1619-29 - PubMed
  8. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;29(4):240-7 - PubMed
  9. Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):131-7 - PubMed
  10. Sports Med. 1993 May;15(5):328-37 - PubMed
  11. Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;90(1):100-9 - PubMed
  12. Mil Med. 2007 Apr;172(4):440-5 - PubMed
  13. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Oct;80(10):1421-7 - PubMed
  14. Acad Med. 2007 May;82(5):452-7 - PubMed
  15. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Mar;85-A(3):565-7 - PubMed
  16. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994 May;19(5):261-6 - PubMed
  17. Mil Med. 2014 Feb;179(2):162-8 - PubMed
  18. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Oct;35(10):674-8 - PubMed
  19. Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;93(9):1268-75 - PubMed
  20. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):449-59 - PubMed
  21. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Apr;30(4):183-93 - PubMed

Publication Types