Display options
Share it on

Springerplus. 2016 Feb 09;5:118. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1739-y. eCollection 2016.

Evaluation of wild herbivore faeces from South Africa as a potential source of hydrolytically active microorganisms.

SpringerPlus

Luyanda L Ndlela, Stefan Schmidt

Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg, 3209 South Africa.

PMID: 26900540 PMCID: PMC4746204 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1739-y

Abstract

This study assessed faecal matter from three indigenous South African herbivores-zebra, giraffe and impala-as a potential source for hydrolytically active aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria. Herbivore droppings were collected freshly in a local nature reserve in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Soil samples adjacent to faecal collection sites and faeces from a domestic herbivore, the Nguni cow, were included as controls. Hydrolase and dehydrogenase activity in faecal matter and soil samples were measured by the fluorescein diacetate and the triphenyltetrazolium chloride assay. Viable counts and counts for amylase, cellulase, esterase and protease producers were established using plate count agar and solid media containing cellulose, skim milk, starch and Tween 80. Zebra droppings produced the highest hydrolase and dehydrogenase activity. Faecal matter of the three indigenous herbivores generally produced higher hydrolytic activity than Nguni cow faeces and soil controls, thereby confirming that these materials are potential targets for hydrolytic enzyme mining.

Keywords: Faeces; Fluorescein diacetate; Giraffe; Hydrolases; Impala; Nguni; Triphenyltetrazolium chloride; Zebra

References

  1. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Dec;63(4):735-50, table of contents - PubMed
  2. J Microbiol Methods. 2001 Sep;46(3):261-7 - PubMed
  3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;59(1):15-32 - PubMed
  4. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;13(4):345-51 - PubMed
  5. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(2):295-300 - PubMed
  6. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003 Aug;14(4):438-43 - PubMed
  7. Can J Microbiol. 1959 Apr;5(2):229-35 - PubMed
  8. J Gen Microbiol. 1962 Sep;29:69-81 - PubMed
  9. Oecologia. 2004 Sep;141(1):66-75 - PubMed
  10. J Microbiol Methods. 2005 Jan;60(1):21-30 - PubMed
  11. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1256-61 - PubMed
  12. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Feb;56(2):137-43 - PubMed
  13. Bioresour Technol. 2008 Jan;99(2):335-43 - PubMed
  14. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(2):179-83 - PubMed
  15. J Environ Sci (China). 2007;19(8):1014-9 - PubMed
  16. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1125:267-79 - PubMed
  17. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009 Jun;20(3):358-63 - PubMed
  18. Curr Microbiol. 2011 Mar;62(3):1050-5 - PubMed
  19. Bioresour Technol. 2011 May;102(10):5692-701 - PubMed
  20. Integr Comp Biol. 2002 Apr;42(2):319-26 - PubMed
  21. J Anim Sci. 2012 Nov;90(11):4020-7 - PubMed
  22. Springerplus. 2013 Apr 30;2(1):195 - PubMed
  23. Microb Ecol. 1984 Jun;10(2):179-85 - PubMed
  24. Microb Ecol. 1980 Sep;6(3):217-26 - PubMed
  25. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Oct;90(1):237-46 - PubMed
  26. Oecologia. 1998 Sep;116(3):381-389 - PubMed
  27. Oecologia. 1992 Jun;90(3):422-428 - PubMed
  28. Appl Microbiol. 1967 Jul;15(4):954-5 - PubMed
  29. Br J Nutr. 1982 Mar;47(2):267-72 - PubMed
  30. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jan;47(1):219-21 - PubMed
  31. Int J Parasitol. 1996 Mar;26(3):291-5 - PubMed

Publication Types