Display options
Share it on

J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Dec;7(6):437-45. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.437. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

Impact of a "TED-Style" presentation on potential patients' willingness to accept dental implant therapy: a one-group, pre-test post-test study.

The journal of advanced prosthodontics

Henry Ghanem, Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar, Samer Abi-Nader, Faleh Tamimi

Affiliations

  1. Private practice limited to Prosthodontics, Riyadh, KSA.
  2. Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Private practice limited to Prosthodontics, Riviera Maya, Mexico.
  3. Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; Private practice limited to Prosthodontics, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  4. Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

PMID: 26816573 PMCID: PMC4722147 DOI: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.437

Abstract

PURPOSE: A survey was conducted to assess the impact of a TED-like educational session on participants' willingness to accept dental implant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volunteers interested in having information about dental implant therapies were recruited and asked to complete a two-part survey before and after an educational session. The initial survey elicited demographic information, self-perceived knowledge on dental implants and willingness to this kind of treatment. A "TED-style" presentation that provided information about dental implant treatments was conducted before asking the participants to complete a second set of questions assessing the impact of the session.

RESULTS: The survey was completed by 104 individuals, 78.8% were women and the mean age was 66.5±10.8. Before the educational session, 76.0% of the participants refused dental implants mainly due to lack of knowledge. After the educational session, the rejection of dental implants decreased by almost four folds to 20.2%.

CONCLUSION: This study proved that an educational intervention can significantly increase willingness to accept treatment with dental implants in a segment of the population who is interested in having information about dental implant therapy. Furthermore, educational interventions, such as TED-like talks, might be useful to increase popular awareness on dental implant therapy.

Keywords: Acceptance; Cost; Dental education; Dental implants; Fear; Refusal; Treatment

References

  1. Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):483-8 - PubMed
  2. J Dent. 2012 Jan;40(1):22-34 - PubMed
  3. Gerodontology. 2002 Jul;19(1):3-4 - PubMed
  4. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Oct;11(5):401-8 - PubMed
  5. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Feb;142(2):197-200 - PubMed
  6. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):272-9 - PubMed
  7. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 Aug;4(3):174-8 - PubMed
  8. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994 Apr;22(2):130-5 - PubMed
  9. J Commun Dis. 2010 Jun;42(2):123-33 - PubMed
  10. Angle Orthod. 2011 May;81(3):517-24 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):6-10 - PubMed
  12. J N J Dent Assoc. 2013 Summer;84(3):11-2 - PubMed
  13. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;59(1):215-26 - PubMed
  14. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Aug;13(4):381-9 - PubMed
  15. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Feb;138(2):188-95; quiz 248-9 - PubMed
  16. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991 Jul-Sep;2(3):99-102 - PubMed
  17. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Mar;42(3):220-33 - PubMed
  18. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Dec;22(12):1399-403 - PubMed
  19. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10(4):278-93 - PubMed
  20. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2011 Nov 16;:null - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e62403 - PubMed
  22. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):117-22 - PubMed
  23. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):621-33 - PubMed
  24. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2011;(218):3-65 - PubMed
  25. Nurs Res. 1984 Sep-Oct;33(5):306-12 - PubMed
  26. Gerodontology. 2010 Mar;27(1):3-10 - PubMed
  27. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):848-56 - PubMed
  28. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;36(9):814-7 - PubMed
  29. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Mar;71(3):310-5 - PubMed
  30. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):634-42 - PubMed
  31. Northwest Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;90(6):21-4 - PubMed
  32. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Apr;144(4):426-8 - PubMed
  33. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):182-92 - PubMed
  34. J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(2):312-9 - PubMed
  35. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984 Mar;39(3):478-89 - PubMed
  36. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):106-12 - PubMed
  37. J Adolesc Health. 2003 Dec;33(6):436-57 - PubMed
  38. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Feb;22(2):223-9 - PubMed
  39. Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143-64 - PubMed
  40. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;44(3):377-88 - PubMed
  41. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 Summer;7(2):228-32 - PubMed
  42. Gerodontology. 2011 Mar;28(1):62-8 - PubMed
  43. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 09;9(4):e93609 - PubMed
  44. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e914-23 - PubMed
  45. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Aug;143(8):881-9 - PubMed
  46. Can Fam Physician. 2014 Sep;60(9):777-8, 788-9 - PubMed
  47. Public Health Rep. 2008 May-Jun;123(3):260; author reply 260-1 - PubMed
  48. Scand J Public Health. 2009 Jun;37(4):427-33 - PubMed
  49. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):154 - PubMed

Publication Types