RMD Open. 2015 Dec 30;1(1):e000181. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000181. eCollection 2015.
Comparative effectiveness of biologic monotherapy versus combination therapy for patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from the Corrona registry.
RMD open
Philip J Mease, David H Collier, Katherine C Saunders, Guo Li, Joel M Kremer, Jeffrey D Greenberg
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Rheumatology , Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington , Seattle, Washington , USA.
- Inflammation Global Development , Amgen Inc. , Thousand Oaks, California , USA.
- Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Corrona, LLC , Southborough, Massachusetts , USA.
- Department of Biostatistics , Axio Research LLC , Seattle, Washington , USA.
- Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College and the Center for Rheumatology , Albany, New York , USA.
- Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Corrona, LLC, Southborough, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
PMID: 26819748
PMCID: PMC4716450 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000181
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To characterise the comparative effectiveness of combination therapy (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) such as methotrexate) and monotherapy (TNFi only) for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from a large US registry.
METHODS: The analysis included adult patients with PsA who were enrolled in the Corrona database (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01402661), had initiated a TNFi, were biologic naïve, and had a follow-up visit ≥90 days after drug initiation. The endpoints of the analysis were TNFi persistence (drug survival) and time to Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission. All analyses were performed using propensity scoring, which were estimated using CDAI and patient sex, to control for channelling bias.
RESULTS: Of 519 patients meeting the inclusion criteria (318 with combination therapy and 201 with monotherapy), the analysis population was 497 for TNFi persistence and 380 for time to remission. The difference between combination therapy (TNFi+methotrexate, 91% of patients; TNFi+other csDMARD, 9%) and monotherapy was not statistically significant for TNFi persistence (32 and 31 months, p=0.73) and time to remission (21 and 25 months, p=0.56). Predictors of TNFi persistence included Hispanic ethnicity (longer persistence), PsA duration (longer persistence), history of methotrexate use (shorter persistence), body mass index (shorter persistence) and disease activity (shorter persistence).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PsA from a large US registry experienced similar TNFi persistence on combination therapy and monotherapy. Prospective, randomised clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of combination therapy versus monotherapy would provide much-needed clarity on treatment options for patients with PsA.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01402661.
Keywords: Anti-TNF; DMARDs (biologic); Psoriatic Arthritis
References
- J Rheumatol. 2012 Mar;39(3):568-73 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jan;54(1):26-37 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):132-7 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jun;41(6):1103-10 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2011 Apr 13;305(14):1460-8 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr;60(4):976-86 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Oct;40(10):1868-72 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):376-81 - PubMed
- J Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;42(1):73-8 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct;52(10):3279-89 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Sep;41(9):1552-63 - PubMed
- Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2012 Aug;38(3):441-76 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):48-55 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Aug;64(8):1150-7 - PubMed
- BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 24;13:184 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Mar;70 Suppl 1:i77-84 - PubMed
- J Rheumatol. 2013 Feb;40(2):127-36 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Dec;70(12):2152-4 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 May;58(5):851-64 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):48-53 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2004 Feb 28;363(9410):675-81 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Mar;70(3):512-6 - PubMed
- Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Aug;51(8):1368-77 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Feb;63(2):382-90 - PubMed
- Joint Bone Spine. 2012 Mar;79(2):149-55 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):908-10 - PubMed
- Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jan;65(1):141-7 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):624-5 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Mar;67(3):364-9 - PubMed
- Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71 Suppl 1:S41-5 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Dec;73(12):2178-82 - PubMed
- Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Jul;75(1):45-9 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Mar;74(3):513-8 - PubMed
- Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;9(3):164-72 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jul;50(7):2264-72 - PubMed
- Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(3):R569-80 - PubMed
- Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Nov;53(11):2100-9 - PubMed
- Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 May 02;8(5):251-2 - PubMed
- Dermatol Ther. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):40-55 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Nov;69(5):729-35 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Oct;53(4):573 - PubMed
- J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Oct;27(10):1262-8 - PubMed
Publication Types