Cite
Kessler J, Yli BM, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. Why did the authors perform a meta-analysis of studies with primary endpoints they consider clinically unimportant?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(5):606-7doi: 10.1111/aogs.12876.
Kessler, J., Yli, B. M., Stray-Pedersen, B., Jacobsen, A. F., Saugstad, O. D., & Henriksen, T. (2016). Why did the authors perform a meta-analysis of studies with primary endpoints they consider clinically unimportant?. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 95(5), 606-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12876
Kessler, Jörg, et al. "Why did the authors perform a meta-analysis of studies with primary endpoints they consider clinically unimportant?." Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica vol. 95,5 (2016): 606-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12876
Kessler J, Yli BM, Stray-Pedersen B, Jacobsen AF, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T. Why did the authors perform a meta-analysis of studies with primary endpoints they consider clinically unimportant?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 May;95(5):606-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12876. Epub 2016 Mar 27. PMID: 26878842.
Copy
Download .nbib