Display options
Cite
Taïhi I, Nassif A, Berbar T, et al. Validation of Housekeeping Genes to Study Human Gingival Stem Cells and Their In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation Using Real-Time RT-qPCR. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2016:6261490doi: 10.1155/2016/6261490.
Taïhi, I., Nassif, A., Berbar, T., Isaac, J., Berdal, A., Gogly, B., & Fournier, B. P. (2016). Validation of Housekeeping Genes to Study Human Gingival Stem Cells and Their In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation Using Real-Time RT-qPCR. Stem cells international, 20166261490. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6261490
Taïhi, Ihsène, et al. "Validation of Housekeeping Genes to Study Human Gingival Stem Cells and Their In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation Using Real-Time RT-qPCR." Stem cells international vol. 2016 (2016): 6261490. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6261490
Taïhi I, Nassif A, Berbar T, Isaac J, Berdal A, Gogly B, Fournier BP. Validation of Housekeeping Genes to Study Human Gingival Stem Cells and Their In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation Using Real-Time RT-qPCR. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:6261490. doi: 10.1155/2016/6261490. Epub 2015 Dec 30. PMID: 26880978; PMCID: PMC4736224.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:6261490. doi: 10.1155/2016/6261490. Epub 2015 Dec 30.

Validation of Housekeeping Genes to Study Human Gingival Stem Cells and Their In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation Using Real-Time RT-qPCR.

Stem cells international

Ihsène Taïhi, Ali Nassif, Tsouria Berbar, Juliane Isaac, Ariane Berdal, Bruno Gogly, Benjamin Philippe Fournier

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Molecular Oral Physiopathology, INSERM UMRS 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, 75006 Paris, France; Paris-Descartes, Pierre and Marie Curie, and Paris-Diderot Universities, UFR Odontology, 75006 Paris, France; AP-HP, Hospital Complex Henri-Mondor Albert-Chenevier, CIC-BT-504, 94000 Creteil, France.
  2. Laboratory of Molecular Oral Physiopathology, INSERM UMRS 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, 75006 Paris, France; Paris-Descartes, Pierre and Marie Curie, and Paris-Diderot Universities, UFR Odontology, 75006 Paris, France.
  3. Laboratory of Molecular Oral Physiopathology, INSERM UMRS 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, 75006 Paris, France; Paris-Descartes, Pierre and Marie Curie, and Paris-Diderot Universities, UFR Odontology, 75006 Paris, France; Reference Center for Dental Rare Disease, Rothschild Hospital, 75012 Paris, France.

PMID: 26880978 PMCID: PMC4736224 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6261490

Abstract

Gingival stem cells (GSCs) are recently isolated multipotent cells. Their osteogenic capacity has been validated in vitro and may be transferred to human cell therapy for maxillary large bone defects, as they share a neural crest cell origin with jaw bone cells. RT-qPCR is a widely used technique to study gene expression and may help us to follow osteoblast differentiation of GSCs. For accurate results, the choice of reliable housekeeping genes (HKGs) is crucial. The aim of this study was to select the most reliable HKGs for GSCs study and their osteogenic differentiation (dGSCs). The analysis was performed with ten selected HKGs using four algorithms: ΔCt comparative method, GeNorm, BestKeeper, and NormFinder. This study demonstrated that three HKGs, SDHA, ACTB, and B2M, were the most stable to study GSC, whereas TBP, SDHA, and ALAS1 were the most reliable to study dGSCs. The comparison to stem cells of mesenchymal origin (ASCs) showed that SDHA/HPRT1 were the most appropriate for ASCs study. The choice of suitable HKGs for GSCs is important as it gave access to an accurate analysis of osteogenic differentiation. It will allow further study of this interesting stem cells source for future human therapy.

References

  1. Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034 - PubMed
  2. BMC Mol Biol. 2009 Jun 09;10:56 - PubMed
  3. Stem Cells Dev. 2008 Jun;17(3):509-18 - PubMed
  4. Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):557-9 - PubMed
  5. Bone. 2012 Jan;50(1):325-30 - PubMed
  6. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Dec;125(24):4504-10 - PubMed
  7. J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Jan;17(1):168-80 - PubMed
  8. Sci Rep. 2012;2:222 - PubMed
  9. Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509-15 - PubMed
  10. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Sep;16(9):2891-9 - PubMed
  11. Development. 2008 Sep;135(17):2845-54 - PubMed
  12. Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22 - PubMed
  13. Anal Biochem. 2005 Sep 1;344(1):141-3 - PubMed
  14. Biomaterials. 2010 Jan;31(2):270-8 - PubMed
  15. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015 Mar;11(3):140-50 - PubMed
  16. BMC Mol Biol. 2006 Oct 06;7:33 - PubMed
  17. BMC Mol Biol. 2010 May 21;11:39 - PubMed
  18. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245-50 - PubMed
  19. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1160:5-17 - PubMed
  20. Stem Cells Dev. 2013 Dec 15;22(24):3157-77 - PubMed
  21. J Cell Physiol. 2011 Oct;226(10):2469-77 - PubMed
  22. J Appl Genet. 2013 Nov;54(4):391-406 - PubMed
  23. J Mol Endocrinol. 2002 Aug;29(1):23-39 - PubMed
  24. Cell Tissue Res. 2013 Jul;353(1):65-78 - PubMed
  25. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015 Feb;21(2):192-206 - PubMed
  26. Stem Cells Dev. 2014 Dec 1;23(23):2895-907 - PubMed

Publication Types