Display options
Share it on

Diagnostics (Basel). 2014 Jan 09;4(1):1-11. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics4010001.

An Improved Neutral a-Glucosidase Assay for Assessment of Epididymal Function-Validation and Comparison to the WHO Method.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)

Frank Eertmans, Veerle Bogaert, Tanita Van Poecke, Barbara Puype

Affiliations

  1. Department of Research and Development, FertiPro NV, Industriepark Noord 32, 8730 Beernem, WVL, Belgium. [email protected].
  2. Department of Research and Development, FertiPro NV, Industriepark Noord 32, 8730 Beernem, WVL, Belgium. [email protected].
  3. Laboratory of Andrology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, OVL, Belgium. [email protected].
  4. Department of Research and Development, FertiPro NV, Industriepark Noord 32, 8730 Beernem, WVL, Belgium. [email protected].

PMID: 26852674 PMCID: PMC4665511 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics4010001

Abstract

Neutral a-glucosidase (NAG) activity in human seminal plasma is an important indicator for epididymis functionality. In the present study, the classic World Health Organization (WHO) method has been adapted to enhance assay robustness. Changes include modified enzyme reaction buffer composition and usage of an alternative enzyme inhibitor for background correction (glucose instead of castanospermine). Both methods have been tested in parallel on 144 semen samples, obtained from 94 patients/donors and 50 vasectomized men (negative control), respectively. Passing-Bablok regression analysis demonstrated equal assay performance. In terms of assay validation, analytical specificity, detection limit, measuring range, precision, and cut-off values have been calculated. These data confirm that the adapted method is a reliable, improved tool for NAG analysis in human semen.

Keywords: assay validation; epididymis; method optimization; neutral a-glucosidase

References

  1. J Androl. 1984 Jul-Aug;5(4):277-82 - PubMed
  2. Fertil Steril. 1987 Feb;47(2):324-8 - PubMed
  3. Int J Androl. 1990 Aug;13(4):297-305 - PubMed
  4. J Androl. 2005 Jul-Aug;26(4):459-69 - PubMed
  5. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jul;8(7):1070-3 - PubMed
  6. Clin Chem. 1978 Feb;24(2):208-11 - PubMed
  7. J Androl. 1988 Mar-Apr;9(2):91-101 - PubMed
  8. J Androl. 1986 May-Jun;7(3):156-62 - PubMed
  9. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Jan 31;1645(1):22-9 - PubMed
  10. Biochemistry. 2011 Oct 4;50(39):8264-9 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983 Nov;21(11):709-20 - PubMed
  12. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008 Aug;29 Suppl 1:S23-6 - PubMed

Publication Types