Display options
Share it on

Front Neurosci. 2016 Jan 11;9:498. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00498. eCollection 2015.

Neuroplastic Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Painful Symptoms Reduction in Chronic Hepatitis C: A Phase II Randomized, Double Blind, Sham Controlled Trial.

Frontiers in neuroscience

Aline P Brietzke, Joanna R Rozisky, Jairo A Dussan-Sarria, Alicia Deitos, Gabriela Laste, Priscila F T Hoppe, Suzana Muller, Iraci L S Torres, Mário R Alvares-da-Silva, Rivadavio F B de Amorim, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation, Department of Clinical Research Center, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  2. Department of Internal Medicine (Gastroenterology/Hepatology), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  3. Laboratory of Neuromodulation and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Physics and Rehabilitation Department, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston, MA, USA.

PMID: 26793047 PMCID: PMC4707227 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00498

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pegylated Interferon Alpha (Peg-IFN) in combination with other drugs is the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection (HCV) and is related to severe painful symptoms. The aim of this study was access the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in controlling the painful symptoms related to Peg-IFN side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase II double-blind trial, twenty eight (n = 28) HCV subjects were randomized to receive either 5 consecutive days of active tDCS (n = 14) or sham (n = 14) during 5 consecutive days with anodal stimulation over the primary motor cortex region using 2 mA for 20 min. The primary outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) pain and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) serum levels. Secondary outcomes were the pressure-pain threshold (PPT), the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (B-PCP:S), and drug analgesics use.

RESULTS: tDCS reduced the VAS scores (P < 0.003), with a mean pain drop of 56% (p < 0.001). Furthermore, tDCS was able to enhance BDNF levels (p < 0.01). The mean increase was 37.48% in the active group. Finally, tDCS raised PPT (p < 0.001) and reduced the B-PCP:S scores and analgesic use (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Five sessions of tDCS were effective in reducing the painful symptoms in HCV patients undergoing Peg-IFN treatment. These findings support the efficacy of tDCS as a promising therapeutic tool to improve the tolerance of the side effects related to the use of Peg-IFN. Future larger studies (phase III and IV trials) are needed to confirm the clinical use of the therapeutic effects of tDCS in such condition.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Human Health Regulator for Research with the approval number CAAE 07802012.0.0000.5327.

Keywords: Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C virus; PEG-IFN; chronic pain; transcranial direct current stimulation

References

  1. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Feb 15;65(4):296-303 - PubMed
  2. J Pain. 2014 Aug;15(8):845-55 - PubMed
  3. JAMA. 2014 Aug 13;312(6):631-40 - PubMed
  4. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Mar;22(3):285-e81 - PubMed
  5. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun;73(6):1158-64 - PubMed
  6. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Feb;20(2):319-24 - PubMed
  7. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):422-32 - PubMed
  8. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Aug;32(8):1236-49 - PubMed
  9. Clin J Pain. 2008 Jan;24(1):56-63 - PubMed
  10. Brain Behav Immun. 2007 Aug;21(6):727-35 - PubMed
  11. J Hepatol. 2015 Jul;63(1):199-236 - PubMed
  12. BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Apr 11;12:86 - PubMed
  13. Int J Neurosci. 2004 Dec;114(12):1601-12 - PubMed
  14. J Affect Disord. 2004 Oct 15;82(2):175-90 - PubMed
  15. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209 - PubMed
  16. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1263-71, table of contents - PubMed
  17. Neuroimage. 2007;37 Suppl 1:S71-9 - PubMed
  18. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 May 07;15:144 - PubMed
  19. Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1076-83 - PubMed
  20. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):23-30 - PubMed
  21. J Neurosci. 2004 Mar 10;24(10):2394-400 - PubMed
  22. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Mar;14(2):247-53 - PubMed
  23. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Jan;15(1):43-53 - PubMed
  24. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jan;17(1):55-66 - PubMed
  25. J Neurosci. 2005 Nov 9;25(45):10390-402 - PubMed
  26. Pain Med. 2012 Nov;13(11):1425-35 - PubMed
  27. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9 - PubMed
  28. Pain. 2013 Jun;154(6):874-81 - PubMed
  29. AIDS Care. 2015;27(7):829-35 - PubMed
  30. Cephalalgia. 2011 Apr;31(6):661-70 - PubMed
  31. Neurology. 2010 Dec 14;75(24):2176-84 - PubMed
  32. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 09;8(7):e67770 - PubMed
  33. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec;54(12):3988-98 - PubMed
  34. Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;34(1):215-20 - PubMed
  35. Clin J Pain. 2014 Sep;30(9):809-15 - PubMed
  36. J Psychosom Res. 2015 Feb;78(2):184-92 - PubMed
  37. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:527-65 - PubMed
  38. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):119-26 - PubMed
  39. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):3109-17 - PubMed
  40. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e15 - PubMed
  41. Pain. 2015 Jan;156(1):62-71 - PubMed
  42. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 18;3:59 - PubMed
  43. Brain Stimul. 2009 Apr;2(2):103-7 - PubMed
  44. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Mar;68(3):223-33 - PubMed
  45. Trends Neurosci. 2000 Dec;23(12):639-45 - PubMed
  46. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):212-7 - PubMed
  47. Mol Pain. 2014 Jul 08;10:46 - PubMed
  48. Headache. 2012 Sep;52(8):1283-95 - PubMed
  49. J Pain Manag. 2009;2(3):353-361 - PubMed
  50. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;117(10):2221-7 - PubMed

Publication Types