Display options
Share it on

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Oct 31;29:284. eCollection 2015.

Using 360-degree multi-source feedback to evaluate professionalism in surgery departments: An Iranian perspective.

Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Adel Yazdankhah, Mohammad Tayefeh Norooz, Hadi Ahmadi Amoli, Ali Aminian, Zhamak Khorgami, Paria Khashayar, Patricia Khashayar

Affiliations

  1. MD, Associate Professor, Surgery Department, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  2. MD, Assistant Professor, Surgery Department, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  3. MD, Associate Professor, Surgery Department, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  4. MD, Assistant Professor, Surgery Department, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  5. MD, Assistant Professor, Surgery Department, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  6. PhD Candidate, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  7. MD, PhD Candidate, Osteoporosis Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, & Center for Microsystems Technology, Imec and Ghent University, Gent-Zwijnaarde, [email protected].

PMID: 26913247 PMCID: PMC4764278

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical professionalism helps physicians adopt a proper and good healing action for the patients based on their particular circumstance. This study was conducted to assess professionalism in surgical residents, using a 360-degree evaluation technique in several teaching hospitals in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS: This study was conducted on all the second and third year surgery residents from three university teaching hospitals in Tehran. Multi-source feedback questionnaire contained 10 questions on the residents' professional behavior and was completed by the faculty and staff members (nurses, operation room staff, and medical assistants) as well as other surgery residents, interns and patients to evaluate each resident. Response rates were used to determine feasibility for each of the respondent groups and the mean and standard deviation score for each question was computed to determine the viability of the items. Reliability was assessed using alpha Cronbach coefficient for each respondent group. The correlation between these scores and the residents' final and OSCE grade was also assessed.

RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability for 360-degree rating was 0.889. There was no significant difference in the residents' score in different hospitals. While male residents obtained higher total score, there was no significant difference between them. The residents, however, obtained lower scores compared to the staff. The highest score was recorded for question 6, suggesting that the residents treated the patients regardless of their socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSION: This study revealed a strong agreement between the results gathered from different respondents, confirming the reliability of the questionnaire and the respondents' unbiased response. It also revealed that the residents did well in the whole test, showing they were conscientious and learning to become medical professionals.

Keywords: 360-Degree; Assessment; Multi-Source Feedback; Professionalism

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2673-82 - PubMed
  2. Acad Med. 2001 Jun;76(6):647-50 - PubMed
  3. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67 - PubMed
  4. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Spring;29(2):105-10 - PubMed
  5. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;9(11):1242-8 - PubMed
  6. Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):171-6 - PubMed
  7. JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1655-60 - PubMed
  8. Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):900-4 - PubMed
  9. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2007 Jan;20(1):13-6 - PubMed
  10. Acad Med. 1997 Oct;72(10 Suppl 1):S82-4 - PubMed
  11. BMJ. 2004 May 22;328(7450):1240 - PubMed
  12. JAMA. 2008 Sep 17;300(11):1326-33 - PubMed
  13. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):387-96 - PubMed
  14. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Feb 5;136(3):243-6 - PubMed
  15. Curr Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;61(6):616-26; discussion 627-8 - PubMed
  16. J Surg Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;70(4):475-86 - PubMed
  17. Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):874-82 - PubMed
  18. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jan;77(1):12-7 - PubMed
  19. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):969-72 - PubMed
  20. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(3):228-36 - PubMed
  21. JAMA. 2009 Sep 23;302(12):1316-26 - PubMed
  22. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 May;17(2):183-94 - PubMed
  23. Med Teach. 2006 Nov;28(7):e185-91 - PubMed

Publication Types