Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 28;7:16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00016. eCollection 2016.

The Florence Nightingale Effect: Organizational Identification Explains the Peculiar Link Between Others' Suffering and Workplace Functioning in the Homelessness Sector.

Frontiers in psychology

Laura J Ferris, Jolanda Jetten, Melissa Johnstone, Elise Girdham, Cameron Parsell, Zoe C Walter

Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD, Australia.
  2. Institute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD, Australia.

PMID: 26858670 PMCID: PMC4729912 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00016

Abstract

Frontline employees in the helping professions often perform their duties against a difficult backdrop, including a complex client base and ongoing themes of crisis, suffering, and distress. These factors combine to create an environment in which workers are vulnerable to workplace stress and burnout. The present study tested two models to understand how frontline workers in the homelessness sector deal with the suffering of their clients. First, we examined whether relationships between suffering and workplace functioning (job satisfaction and burnout) would be mediated by organizational identification. Second, we examined whether emotional distance from clients (i.e., infrahumanization, measured as reduced attribution of secondary emotions) would predict improved workplace functioning (less burnout and greater job satisfaction), particularly when client contact is high. The study involved a mixed-methods design comprising interview (N = 26) and cross-sectional survey data (N = 60) with a sample of frontline staff working in the homelessness sector. Participants were asked to rate the level of client suffering and attribute emotions in a hypothetical client task, and to complete questionnaire measures of burnout, job satisfaction, and organizational identification. We found no relationships between secondary emotion attribution and burnout or satisfaction. Instead, we found that perceiving higher client suffering was linked with higher job satisfaction and lower burnout. Mediation analyses revealed a mediating role for identification, such that recognizing suffering predicted greater identification with the organization, which fully mediated the relationship between suffering and job satisfaction, and also between suffering and burnout. Qualitative analysis of interview data also resonated with this conceptualization. We introduce this novel finding as the 'Florence Nightingale effect'. With this sample drawn from the homelessness sector, we provide preliminary evidence for the proposition that recognizing others' suffering may serve to increase job satisfaction and reduce burnout - by galvanizing organizational identification.

Keywords: burnout; infrahumanization; job satisfaction; social identity; social pain; vicarious trauma

References

  1. Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(4):597-617 - PubMed
  2. Br J Educ Psychol. 2003 Sep;73(Pt 3):329-41 - PubMed
  3. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar;7(2):176-86 - PubMed
  4. Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;45(Pt 1):1-40; discussion 47-53 - PubMed
  5. Z Psychol. 2011 Jan 1;219(3):175-181 - PubMed
  6. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014 Apr 12;18(3):256-279 - PubMed
  7. Int J Public Health. 2013 Aug;58(4):637-42 - PubMed
  8. Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;131(2):202-23 - PubMed
  9. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91 - PubMed
  10. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422 - PubMed
  11. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Mar;2(1):45-51 - PubMed
  12. Nat Commun. 2014 Nov 17;5:5380 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):365-83 - PubMed
  14. J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1037-52 - PubMed
  15. Perspect Biol Med. 2012;55(2):266-82 - PubMed
  16. Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar;52(1):180-90 - PubMed
  17. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):292-306 - PubMed
  18. Soc Work. 2007 Jan;52(1):63-70 - PubMed
  19. Med J Aust. 2008 Feb 18;188(4):243-6 - PubMed
  20. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):670-4 - PubMed
  21. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):371-8 - PubMed
  22. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;44(Pt 3):355-70 - PubMed
  23. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;48(Pt 4):707-33 - PubMed
  24. Med J Aust. 2007 Oct 1;187(7):381-2 - PubMed
  25. Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):233-9 - PubMed
  26. Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Sep;53(3):573-84 - PubMed
  27. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61526 - PubMed
  28. Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):847-53 - PubMed
  29. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 - PubMed
  30. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):171-82 - PubMed
  31. Sociol Health Illn. 2005 Sep;27(6):831-54 - PubMed
  32. J Appl Psychol. 1996 Apr;81(2):123-33 - PubMed

Publication Types