Radiol Oncol. 2015 Nov 27;49(4):386-94. doi: 10.1515/raon-2015-0002. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Release of growth factors after mechanical and chemical pleurodesis for treatment of malignant pleural effusion: a randomized control study.
Radiology and oncology
Aljaz Hojski, Maja Leitgeb, Anton Crnjac
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia.
- Biochemistry Division, Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Maribor Slovenia.
PMID: 26834526
PMCID: PMC4722930 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2015-0002
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growth factors are key inducers of fibrosis but can also mediate inflammatory responses resulting in increasing pleural effusion and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary aim of the study was to analyse growth factors release after performing chemical and mechanical pleurodesis in the first 48 hours at the patients with malignant pleural effusion. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the effectiveness of the both pleurodeses, symptoms release and the quality of life of patients after the treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study included 36 consecutive female patients with breast carcinoma and malignant pleural effusion in an intention-to-treat analysis. We treated 18 patients by means of thoracoscopic mechanical pleurodesis and 18 patients by chemical pleurodesis with talcum applied over a chest tube. We gathered the pleural fluid and serum samples in the following 48 hours under a dedicated protocol and tested them for growth factors levels. A quality of life and visual analogue pain score surveys were also performed.
RESULTS: Median measured serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level after chemical pleurodesis was 930.68 pg/ml (95% CI: 388.22-4656.65) and after mechanical pleurodesis 808.54 pg/ml. (95% CI: 463.20-1235.13) (p = 0.103). Median pleural levels of transforming growth factor (TGF) β1 were higher after performing mechanical pleurodesis (4814.00 pg/ml [95% CI: 2726.51-7292.94]) when compared to those after performing chemical pleurodesis (1976.50 pg/ml [95% CI: 1659.82-5136.26]) (p = 0.078). We observed similar results for fibroblast growth factor (FGF) β; the serum level was higher after mechanical pleurodesis (30.45 pg/ml [95% CI: 20.40-59.42]), compared to those after chemical pleurodesis (13.39 pg/ml [95% CI: 5.04 - 74.60]) (p = 0.076). Mechanical pleurodesis was equally effective as chemical pleurodesis in terms of hospital stay, pleural effusion re-accumulation, requiring of additional thoracentesis, median overall survival, but, it shortened the mean thoracic drainage duration (p = 0.030) and resulted in a higher symptoms release and in a better quality of life (p = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: We recorded an increase in serum VEGF levels after chemical pleurodesis, however on the contrary, an increase in the pleural fluid level of TGFβ1 and FGFβ] after mechanical pleurodesis with respect to compared group. Although the differences did not reach statistical significance, VEGF, TGFβ1 and FGFβ remain the most interesting parameters for future research. Considering the mechanisms of growth factors action, we conclude that in our study group mechanical pleurodesis might be more efficient in terms of growth factors release, thoracic drainage duration and resulted in a higher symptoms release and in a better quality of life than chemical pleurodesis.
Keywords: growth factors; malignant pleural effusion; pleurodesis; quality of life
References
- Radiol Oncol. 2014 Jan 22;48(1):80-6 - PubMed
- Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Mar-Apr;17(2):153-62 - PubMed
- Radiol Oncol. 2014 Apr 25;48(2):184-8 - PubMed
- Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40(2):277-9 - PubMed
- Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Nov;5(11):3364-8 - PubMed
- J Transl Med. 2012 Sep 03;10:183 - PubMed
- Lung Cancer. 2011 Dec;74(3):392-5 - PubMed
- Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 May;29(5):829-38 - PubMed
- J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2005 Oct;10(4):283-90 - PubMed
- Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Nov 1;164(9):1601-5 - PubMed
- J BUON. 2006 Oct-Dec;11(4):463-7 - PubMed
- Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1522-8 - PubMed
- J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76 - PubMed
- Chest. 2014 May;145(5):1141-3 - PubMed
- Lung Cancer. 2012 Aug;77(2):443-9 - PubMed
- Respir Med. 2009 Jan;103(1):91-7 - PubMed
- Radiol Oncol. 2013 Mar;47(1):57-62 - PubMed
- Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(3 Pt 1):640-4 - PubMed
- Respir Med. 2009 Apr;103(4):595-600 - PubMed
- Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Aug;26(2):432-6 - PubMed
- Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 May;12(5):818-23 - PubMed
- Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004 Jun;36(6):1031-7 - PubMed
- Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006 Aug;118(15-16):479-84 - PubMed
- Neoplasma. 2004;51(5):334-40 - PubMed
- Anticancer Drugs. 2012 Feb;23(2):230-8 - PubMed
- Lung Cancer. 2004 Sep;45(3):325-37 - PubMed
- Clin Chest Med. 2013 Mar;34(1):xi - PubMed
- Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004;116 Suppl 2:28-32 - PubMed
- Respir Med. 2008 Dec;102(12):1708-14 - PubMed
Publication Types