Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 01;7:277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00277. eCollection 2016.

Australian University Students' Coping Strategies and Use of Pharmaceutical Stimulants as Cognitive Enhancers.

Frontiers in psychology

Charmaine Jensen, Cynthia Forlini, Brad Partridge, Wayne Hall

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  2. University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

PMID: 26973573 PMCID: PMC4771940 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00277

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are reports that some university students are using prescription stimulants for non-medical 'pharmaceutical cognitive enhancement (PCE)' to improve alertness, focus, memory, and mood in an attempt to manage the demands of study at university. Purported demand for PCEs in academic contexts have been based on incomplete understandings of student motivations, and often based on untested assumptions about the context within which stimulants are used. They may represent attempts to cope with biopsychosocial stressors in university life by offsetting students' inadequate coping responses, which in turn may affect their cognitive performance. This study aimed to identify (a) what strategies students adopted to cope with the stress of university life and, (b) to assess whether students who have used stimulants for PCE exhibit particular stress or coping patterns.

METHODS: We interviewed 38 university students (with and without PCE experience) about their experience of managing student life, specifically their: educational values; study habits; achievement; stress management; getting assistance; competing activities and demands; health habits; and cognitive enhancement practices. All interview transcripts were coded into themes and analyzed.

RESULTS: Our thematic analysis revealed that, generally, self-rated coping ability decreased as students' self-rated stress level increased. Students used emotion- and problem-focused coping for the most part and adjustment-focused coping to a lesser extent. Avoidance, an emotion-focused coping strategy, was the most common, followed by problem-focused coping strategies, the use of cognition on enhancing substances, and planning and monitoring of workload. PCE users predominantly used avoidant emotion-focused coping strategies until they no longer mitigated the distress of approaching deadlines resulting in the use of prescription stimulants as a substance-based problem-focused coping strategy.

CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that students who choose coping responses that do not moderate stress where possible, may cause themselves additional distress and avoid learning more effective coping responses. Helping students to understand stress and coping, and develop realistic stress appraisal techniques, may assist students in general to maintain manageable distress levels and functioning. Furthermore, assisting students who may be inclined to use prescription stimulants for cognitive enhancement may reduce possible drug-related harms.

Keywords: cognitive enhancement; coping; prescription stimulants; stress; university students

References

  1. Addiction. 2012 Mar;107(3):467-77 - PubMed
  2. AJOB Neurosci. 2013 Jan;4(1):4-12 - PubMed
  3. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):665-73 - PubMed
  4. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 07;15:23 - PubMed
  5. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016 May;35(3):345-51 - PubMed
  6. J Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;62(10):1231-44 - PubMed
  7. J Am Coll Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;56(4):445-53 - PubMed
  8. J Atten Disord. 2009 Nov;13(3):259-70 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 2008 Dec 11;456(7223):702-5 - PubMed
  10. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Oct;21(5):385-407 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 30;9(10 ):e105969 - PubMed
  12. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Nov 2;91(1):69-76 - PubMed

Publication Types