Display options
Cite
Park YG, Lee SE, Kim EY, et al. Effects of Feeder Cell Types on Culture of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell In Vitro. Dev Reprod. 2015;19(3):119-26doi: 10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119.
Park, Y. G., Lee, S. E., Kim, E. Y., Hyun, H., Shin, M. Y., Son, Y. J., Kim, S. Y., & Park, S. P. (2015). Effects of Feeder Cell Types on Culture of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell In Vitro. Development & reproduction, 19(3), 119-26. https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119
Park, Yun-Gwi, et al. "Effects of Feeder Cell Types on Culture of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell In Vitro." Development & reproduction vol. 19,3 (2015): 119-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119
Park YG, Lee SE, Kim EY, Hyun H, Shin MY, Son YJ, Kim SY, Park SP. Effects of Feeder Cell Types on Culture of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell In Vitro. Dev Reprod. 2015 Sep;19(3):119-26. doi: 10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119. PMID: 27004268; PMCID: PMC4801015.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Dev Reprod. 2015 Sep;19(3):119-26. doi: 10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119.

Effects of Feeder Cell Types on Culture of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell In Vitro.

Development & reproduction

Yun-Gwi Park, Seung-Eun Lee, Eun-Young Kim, Hyuk Hyun, Min-Young Shin, Yeo-Jin Son, Su-Young Kim, Se-Pill Park

Affiliations

  1. Stem Cell Research Center, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea; Faculty of Biotechnology, College of Applied Life Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea.
  2. Stem Cell Research Center, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea; Faculty of Biotechnology, College of Applied Life Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea; Mirae Cell Bio, Seoul 05066, Korea.
  3. Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea.

PMID: 27004268 PMCID: PMC4801015 DOI: 10.12717/DR.2015.19.3.119

Abstract

The suitable feeder cell layer is important for culture of embryonic stem (ES) cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of two kinds of the feeder cell, MEF cells and STO cells, layer to mouse ES (mES) cell culture for maintenance of stemness. We compare the colony formations, alkaline phosphatase (AP) activities, expression of pluripotency marker genes and proteins of D3 cell colonies cultured on MEF feeder cell layer (D3/MEF) or STO cell layers (D3/STO) compared to feeder free condition (D3/-) as a control group. Although there were no differences to colony formations and AP activities, interestingly, the transcripts level of pluripotency marker genes, Pou5f1 and Nanog were highly expressed in D3/MEF (79 and 93) than D3/STO (61and 77) or D3/- (65 and 81). Also, pluripotency marker proteins, NANOG and SOX-2, were more synthesized in D3/MEF (72.8±7.69 and 81.2±3.56) than D3/STO (32.0±4.30 and 56.0±4.90) or D3/- (55.0±4.64 and 62.0±6.20). These results suggest that MEF feeder cell layer is more suitable to mES cell culture.

Keywords: Feeder cell; MEF feeder cell; Mouse embryonic stem cell; Pluripotency marker

References

  1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Jul 6;358(3):948-53 - PubMed
  2. Stem Cells. 2003;21(2):131-42 - PubMed
  3. Cell. 2005 Sep 23;122(6):947-56 - PubMed
  4. Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Jun;18(6):675-9 - PubMed
  5. Cell Transplant. 1996 Mar-Apr;5(2):131-43 - PubMed
  6. Nat Genet. 2006 Apr;38(4):431-40 - PubMed
  7. Neuron. 2002 Aug 29;35(5):865-75 - PubMed
  8. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985 Jun;87:27-45 - PubMed
  9. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jun 1;27(11):2354-60 - PubMed
  10. Cardiovasc Res. 2003 May 1;58(2):278-91 - PubMed
  11. Theriogenology. 2010 Sep 1;74(4):498-515 - PubMed
  12. Hum Reprod. 2004 Mar;19(3):676-84 - PubMed
  13. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:628368 - PubMed
  14. Dev Biol. 2006 Mar 15;291(2):300-13 - PubMed
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Dec 6;91(25):12140-4 - PubMed
  16. Development. 2006 Jan;133(2):209-16 - PubMed
  17. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006 Aug;29(8):1747-50 - PubMed
  18. Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 1;71(13):4640-52 - PubMed
  19. Cell. 2007 Nov 30;131(5):861-72 - PubMed
  20. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):495-507 - PubMed
  21. Cell Reprogram. 2012 Dec;14(6):520-9 - PubMed
  22. Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 12;5:11386 - PubMed
  23. Biol Reprod. 2003 Dec;69(6):2007-14 - PubMed
  24. Nature. 2006 Nov 16;444(7117):364-8 - PubMed
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7634-8 - PubMed

Publication Types