Front Zool. 2016 Mar 31;13:15. doi: 10.1186/s12983-016-0147-z. eCollection 2016.
Physiological mechanisms of dehydration tolerance contribute to the invasion potential of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) relative to its less widely distributed congeners.
Frontiers in zoology
Christopher W Weldon, Leigh Boardman, Danica Marlin, John S Terblanche
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 South Africa.
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa ; Present address: Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, PO Box 110620, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 USA.
- Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 South Africa ; Present address: School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein, 2000 South Africa.
- Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa.
PMID: 27034703
PMCID: PMC4815119 DOI: 10.1186/s12983-016-0147-z
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a highly invasive species now with an almost cosmopolitan distribution. Two other damaging, polyphagous and closely-related species, the marula fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Walker), and the Natal fly, Ceratitis rosa Karsch, are not established outside of sub-Saharan Africa. In this study, adult water balance traits and nutritional body composition were measured in all three species at different temperatures and levels of relative humidity to determine whether tolerance of water stress may partially explain their distribution.
RESULTS: Adult C. capitata exhibited higher desiccation resistance than C. rosa but not C. cosyra. Desiccation resistance of C. capitata was associated with lower rates of water loss under hot and dry conditions, higher dehydration tolerance, and higher lipid reserves that were catabolised during water stress. In comparison with C. capitata, C. cosyra and C. rosa lost water at significantly higher rates under hot, dry conditions, and did not catabolise lipids or other sources of metabolic water during water stress.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that adult physiological traits permitting higher tolerance of water stress play a role in the success of C. capitata, particularly relative to C. rosa. The distribution of C. cosyra is likely determined by the interaction of temperature with water stress, as well as the availability of suitable hosts for larval development.
Keywords: Body composition; Dehydration tolerance; Desiccation resistance; Starvation; Water loss
References
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):15154-8 - PubMed
- Genetica. 2002 Sep;116(1):125-35 - PubMed
- J Exp Biol. 2003 Apr;206(Pt 7):1183-92 - PubMed
- J Insect Physiol. 1997 Jul;43(7):685-694 - PubMed
- J Insect Physiol. 2001 Dec;47(12):1429-1440 - PubMed
- J Evol Biol. 2004 Jan;17(1):83-93 - PubMed
- Mol Ecol. 2006 Mar;15(3):681-94 - PubMed
- J Anim Ecol. 2006 Mar;75(2):518-26 - PubMed
- J Exp Biol. 2006 May;209(Pt 10):1837-47 - PubMed
- Bull Entomol Res. 2006 Jun;96(3):259-68 - PubMed
- Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):981-93 - PubMed
- Genetica. 2007 Sep;131(1):1-9 - PubMed
- Bull Entomol Res. 2002 Dec;92(6):461-9 - PubMed
- Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 22;274(1625):2531-7 - PubMed
- J Insect Physiol. 2008 Feb;54(2):367-77 - PubMed
- J Exp Biol. 2009 Jul;212(Pt 13):2120-7 - PubMed
- Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2011 Apr;158(4):531-41 - PubMed
- Front Physiol. 2011 Oct 25;2:74 - PubMed
- Ecol Evol. 2011 Dec;1(4):479-88 - PubMed
- Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 22;279(1747):4668-76 - PubMed
- Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Apr;70(4):651-60 - PubMed
- Bull Entomol Res. 2013 Dec;103(6):690-9 - PubMed
- Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Aug 07;280(1768):20131466 - PubMed
- J Insect Physiol. 2013 Dec;59(12):1199-211 - PubMed
- J Insect Physiol. 2014 Nov;70:73-80 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2014 Nov 06;9(11):e111582 - PubMed
- Oecologia. 1995 Apr;101(4):416-425 - PubMed
- Evolution. 1996 Apr;50(2):777-786 - PubMed
- J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985 Sep;1(3):299-301 - PubMed
- J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985 Sep;1(3):302-4 - PubMed
- Anal Biochem. 1965 May;11(2):266-71 - PubMed
- J Exp Biol. 1997 Jun;200(Pt 12):1821-32 - PubMed
- Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
- Physiol Zool. 1998 Sep-Oct;71(5):584-94 - PubMed
Publication Types