Display options
Share it on

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Apr;7:S55-61. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.029.

Consensus and conflict in invasive micropapillary carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Journal of gastrointestinal oncology

Li Lei, Huina Zhang, Xinhai Bob Zhang, Roland Lonser, Kevin Thompson, Anwar Raza

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.

PMID: 27034813 PMCID: PMC4783610 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.029

Abstract

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is an aggressive histologic subtype of adenocarcinoma that has been gaining increased attention over the past twenty years. It is important to recognize IMPC due to its strong association with early lymphovascular invasion (LVI), high risk of lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion and poor prognosis. Controversies regarding IMPC include differentiating from retraction artifact and mimics, clinical significance of proportion of micropapillary component (MC), pathogenesis, biologic nature of the entity and consequently terminology, etc. We herein present a case of rectal IMPC arising from a tubulovillous adenoma. Since HER2 over-expression has been reported in IMPC of the breast and the bladder but never in the colorectum, given the availability of HER2 targeted therapy, HER2 protein expression in our case is examined by immunohistochemical study which shows weak incomplete membrane staining in less than 5% of cells. Literature is reviewed with emphasis on colorectal IMPC as well as aforementioned controversial topics. In summary, more study is needed to resolve the conflicts and build consensus on IMPC.

Keywords: Micropapillary; adenocarcinoma; colorectum; retraction artifact; reversed polarity

References

  1. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Aug;34(8):1139-46 - PubMed
  2. Oncol Rep. 2014 Oct;32(4):1355-61 - PubMed
  3. Mod Pathol. 2005 Nov;18(11):1504-11 - PubMed
  4. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):e567-72 - PubMed
  5. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009 Jun;13(3):151-7 - PubMed
  6. Pathol Int. 2014 Aug;64(8):402-8 - PubMed
  7. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2011 May;40(5):304-9 - PubMed
  8. Histopathology. 2005 Nov;47(5):479-84 - PubMed
  9. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Sep;33(9):1287-92 - PubMed
  10. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Jan;35(1):84-91 - PubMed
  11. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Jul;33(7):1037-41 - PubMed
  12. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Sep;34(9):1367-76 - PubMed
  13. Pathology. 2014 Oct;46(6):527-32 - PubMed
  14. Mod Pathol. 2007 Jul;20(7):729-33 - PubMed
  15. Hum Pathol. 2006 Jul;37(7):809-15 - PubMed
  16. J Pathol. 2008 Aug;215(4):398-410 - PubMed
  17. Mod Pathol. 2001 Sep;14(9):836-41 - PubMed
  18. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Aug;37(8):1215-22 - PubMed
  19. Med Mol Morphol. 2009 Jun;42(2):123-7 - PubMed
  20. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Nov;34(11):1637-46 - PubMed
  21. Mod Pathol. 2011 May;24(5):729-38 - PubMed
  22. Pathol Res Pract. 1994 Aug;190(7):668-74 - PubMed
  23. Pathology. 2010;42(6):560-3 - PubMed
  24. Mod Pathol. 2004 Sep;17(9):1045-50 - PubMed
  25. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;42(8):525-9 - PubMed
  26. Med Mol Morphol. 2013 Jun;46(2):114-21 - PubMed
  27. Mod Pathol. 2009 May;22(5):660-7 - PubMed
  28. Mod Pathol. 2014 May;27(5):758-64 - PubMed
  29. Med Mol Morphol. 2007 Dec;40(4):226-30 - PubMed
  30. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Mar;28(3):319-26 - PubMed
  31. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2003 Apr;7(2):112-9 - PubMed
  32. Mod Pathol. 2013 Aug;26(8):1123-31 - PubMed
  33. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 1;20(1):68-75 - PubMed
  34. Biomed Res. 2010 Apr;31(2):89-95 - PubMed
  35. J Pathol. 2009 Jul;218(3):301-15 - PubMed
  36. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014 Sep;142(3):375-83 - PubMed
  37. Pol J Pathol. 2008;59(3):183-5 - PubMed
  38. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Feb;33(2):202-10 - PubMed

Publication Types