Food Nutr Res. 2016 Mar 31;60:29580. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v60.29580. eCollection 2016.
Extract from a mutant Rhodobacter sphaeroides as an enriched carotenoid source.
Food & nutrition research
Chih-Chiang Wang, Shangwu Ding, Kuo-Hsun Chiu, Wen-Sheng Liu, Tai-Jung Lin, Zhi-Hong Wen
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Marine Biotechnology and Resources, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Chemistry, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department and Graduate Institute of Aquaculture, National Kaohsiung Marine University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Asia-Pacific Biotech Developing, Inc., Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
- Department of Pharmacy and Graduate Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Tajen University, Pingtun County, Taiwan.
- Department of Marine Biotechnology and Resources, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; [email protected].
PMID: 27037001
PMCID: PMC4818355 DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v60.29580
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The extract Lycogen™ from the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides (WL-APD911) has attracted significant attention because of its promising potential as a bioactive mixture, attributed in part to its anti-inflammatory properties and anti-oxidative activity.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the components of Lycogen™ and its anti-inflammatory properties and anti-oxidative activity.
DESIGN AND RESULTS: The mutant strain R. sphaeroides (WL-APD911) whose carotenoid 1,2-hydratase gene has been altered by chemical mutagenesis was used for the production of a new carotenoid. The strain was grown at 30°C on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates. After a 4-day culture period, the mutant strain displayed a 3.5-fold increase in carotenoid content, relative to the wild type. In the DPPH test, Lycogen™ showed more potent anti-oxidative activity than lycopene from the wild-type strain. Primary skin irritation test with hamsters showed no irritation response in hamster skins after 30 days of treatment with 0.2% Lycogen™. Chemical investigations of Lycogen™ using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (1)H, (13)C, and COSY/DQCOSY spectra have identified spheroidenone and methoxyneurosporene. Quantitative analysis of these identified compounds based on spectral intensities indicates that spheroidenone and methoxyneurosporene are major components (approximately 1:1); very small quantities of other derivatives are also present in the sample.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we identified the major carotenoid compounds contained in Lycogen™, including spheroidenone and methoxyneurosporene by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy analysis. The carotenoid content of this mutant strain of R. sphaeroides was 3.5-fold higher than that in normal strain. Furthermore, Lycogen™ from the mutant strain is more potent than lycopene from the wild-type strain and does not cause irritation in hamster skins. These findings suggest that this mutant strain has the potential to be used as an enriched carotenoid source.
Keywords: Lycogen™; Rhodobacter sphaeroides; anti-oxidative; carotenoid; methoxyneurosporene; phototrophic bacteria
References
- Biochem J. 1991 Mar 15;274 ( Pt 3):881-4 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Dec;77(3):505-12 - PubMed
- Methods Mol Biol. 2012;898:41-59 - PubMed
- Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001 Jan 1;385(1):4-12 - PubMed
- Arch Microbiol. 1996 Jun;165(6):397-401 - PubMed
- FEBS Lett. 1997 Feb 10;403(1):10-4 - PubMed
- J Nat Prod. 2002 Nov;65(11):1683-4 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 May;98(10):4355-68 - PubMed
- Int Microbiol. 2003 Mar;6(1):11-6 - PubMed
- Curr Microbiol. 2012 Aug;65(2):150-5 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1996 Oct;178(20):5877-83 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1994 Jul;176(13):3859-69 - PubMed
- World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;28(4):1781-90 - PubMed
- Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Mar;232(1):74-80 - PubMed
- Mol Microbiol. 2002 Apr;44(1):233-44 - PubMed
- FEBS Lett. 1995 Sep 25;372(2-3):199-202 - PubMed
- Mol Aspects Med. 2003 Dec;24(6):345-51 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Nutr. 1999 Oct;18(5):426-33 - PubMed
- Biotechnol Lett. 2012 Aug;34(8):1405-14 - PubMed
- Eur J Biochem. 1994 Jul 1;223(1):7-24 - PubMed
- J Nat Prod. 2001 Jul;64(7):892-5 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1997 Dec;179(23):7462-7 - PubMed
- Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004 Oct 1;430(1):37-48 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1980 Mar 25;255(6):2427-32 - PubMed
- Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003 Jun 1;414(1):51-8 - PubMed
- Vet Res Commun. 2014 Mar;38(1):59-62 - PubMed
- Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Jan 23;15(2):1686-99 - PubMed
- Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2011 Nov-Dec;441:290-3 - PubMed
- Molecules. 2012 Nov 16;17(11):13622-30 - PubMed
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 29;109(22):8570-5 - PubMed
Publication Types