Display options
Share it on

Stroke Res Treat. 2016;2016:6941946. doi: 10.1155/2016/6941946. Epub 2016 Feb 01.

The Effect of Electromagnetic Field Treatment on Recovery from Ischemic Stroke in a Rat Stroke Model: Clinical, Imaging, and Pathological Findings.

Stroke research and treatment

Y Segal, L Segal, T Blumenfeld-Katzir, E Sasson, V Poliansky, E Loeb, A Levy, A Alter, N Bregman

Affiliations

  1. BrainQ Ltd., 9339228 Jerusalem, Israel.
  2. BioImage Ltd., 52582 Ramat Gan, Israel.
  3. Pharmaseed Ltd., 74047 Ness Ziona, Israel.

PMID: 26949561 PMCID: PMC4753339 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6941946

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Effects of stroke include significant deficits in sensory-motor skills and cognitive abilities. At present, there are limited effective interventions for postacute stroke patients. In this preliminary research we studied a new noninvasive, very low intensity, low frequency, electromagnetic field treatment (VLIFE), targeting a neural network, on an in vivo stroke rat model. Eighteen rats were divided into three groups: sham (M1) and two treatment groups which were exposed to VLIFE treatment for 4 weeks, one using theta waves (M2) and another using beta waves (M3); all groups were followed up for an additional month. Results indicate that the M2 and M3 treated groups showed recovery of sensorimotor functional deficits, as demonstrated by Modified Neurological Severity Score and forelimb placement tests. Brain MRI imaging results show a decrease in perilesional edema and lateral ventricle widening in the treated groups. Fiber tracts' imaging, following VLIFE treatment, showed a higher white matter integrity compared to control. Histological findings support neural regeneration processes. Our data suggest that VLIFE treatment, targeting a specific functional neural network by frequency rather than location, promotes neuronal plasticity after stroke and, as a result, improves clinical recovery. Further studies will investigate the full potential of the treatment.

References

  1. Exp Neurol. 2005 Feb;191(2):310-7 - PubMed
  2. Magn Reson Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):928-34 - PubMed
  3. J Neurotrauma. 1994 Jun;11(3):345-53 - PubMed
  4. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):509-17 - PubMed
  5. J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Jul 15;208(2):197-204 - PubMed
  6. Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):490-9 - PubMed
  7. Stroke. 2012 Aug;43(8):2207-11 - PubMed
  8. Front Neurosci. 2013 Apr 02;7:42 - PubMed
  9. J Physiol Paris. 2009 Sep-Dec;103(3-5):244-54 - PubMed
  10. Exp Transl Stroke Med. 2010 Jul 19;2(1):13 - PubMed
  11. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):308-9 - PubMed
  12. Prog Brain Res. 2006;159:79-97 - PubMed
  13. Med Hypotheses. 2003 Jun;60(6):843-4 - PubMed
  14. Brain Res. 1987 Aug 25;418(2):356-60 - PubMed
  15. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 27;8:378 - PubMed
  16. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;117(12):2584-96 - PubMed
  17. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2014 Sep 01;4(3):83-90 - PubMed
  18. Stroke Res Treat. 2013;2013:170256 - PubMed
  19. Stroke. 2009 May;40(5):1764-71 - PubMed
  20. Exp Gerontol. 2011 Aug;46(8):611-27 - PubMed
  21. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jan;37(1):19-31 - PubMed
  22. Lancet. 2008 May 10;371(9624):1612-23 - PubMed

Publication Types