Display options
Share it on

Acta Ortop Bras. 2016 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-6. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162402147450.

USE OF SPATIOTEMPORAL GAIT PARAMETERS TO DETERMINE RETURN TO SPORTS AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION.

Acta ortopedica brasileira

Gustavo Leporace, Leonardo Metsavaht, Gabriel Zeitoune, Thiago Marinho, TainĂ¡ Oliveira, Glauber Ribeiro Pereira, Liszt Palmeira D E Oliveira, Luiz Alberto Batista

Affiliations

  1. . Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

PMID: 26981039 PMCID: PMC4775493 DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220162402147450

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : To compare gait spatiotemporal parameters of healthy and ACL reconstructed subjects in order to classify the status of gait normality.

METHODS: : Fourteen healthy subjects and eight patients submitted to ACL reconstruction walked along a walkway while the lower limbs movement was captured by an infrared camera system. The frames where the initial contact and toe-off took place were determined and the following dependent variables, which were compared between groups through the Mann-Whitney test (a=0.05) were calculated: percentage of time in initial double stance, percentage of time in single stance, percentage of time in terminal double stance, stride length and gait velocity. Initially, all variables were compared between groups using a Mann-Whitney test. A logistic regression was applied, including all dependent variables, to create a model that could differentiate healthy and ACL reconstructed subjects.

RESULTS: : ACL reconstructed group showed no differences in any spatiotemporal parameter of gait (p > 0.05) in relation to the control group, although the angular kinematic differences of the knee remained altered, as evidenced in a study with a similar sample.

CONCLUSION: : The regression classified all subjects as healthy, including the ACL reconstructed group, suggesting the spatiotemporal variables should not be used as the sole criterion of return to sports activities at the same level as prior to injury. Level of Evidence III, Case Control Study.

Keywords: Knee; Sports; Wounds and injuries

References

  1. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:6514-7 - PubMed
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jul;47(7):1426-34 - PubMed
  3. Phys Sportsmed. 2011 Sep;39(3):100-10 - PubMed
  4. Gait Posture. 2004 Oct;20(2):140-6 - PubMed
  5. J Exp Biol. 2007 Jul;210(Pt 13):2390-8 - PubMed
  6. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Apr;46(5):355-9 - PubMed
  7. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Mar;25(3):222-9 - PubMed
  8. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;56(5):384-95 - PubMed
  9. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1798-805 - PubMed
  10. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):75-9 - PubMed
  11. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jul;19(7):1168-77 - PubMed
  12. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004 Jun;14 (3):287-94 - PubMed
  13. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Oct;50(10 ):3145-52 - PubMed
  14. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Nov;42(11):932-9 - PubMed
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jan;442:39-44 - PubMed
  16. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):41-8 - PubMed
  17. Gait Posture. 2007 Mar;25(3):469-74 - PubMed
  18. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1894-9 - PubMed
  19. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(4):779-88 - PubMed
  20. Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43(5):366-70 - PubMed
  21. Clin J Sport Med. 2012 Mar;22(2):116-21 - PubMed
  22. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Aug;19(4):569-75 - PubMed
  23. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Feb;20(2):209-17 - PubMed
  24. Phys Ther. 2010 Feb;90(2):157-74 - PubMed
  25. Knee. 2006 Jun;13(3):184-8 - PubMed
  26. J Biomech. 2011 Jul 7;44(10 ):1948-53 - PubMed

Publication Types