Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 31;7:347. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00347. eCollection 2016.
Nitric Oxide Mitigates Salt Stress by Regulating Levels of Osmolytes and Antioxidant Enzymes in Chickpea.
Frontiers in plant science
Parvaiz Ahmad, Arafat A Abdel Latef, Abeer Hashem, Elsayed F Abd Allah, Salih Gucel, Lam-Son P Tran
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Botany, Sri Pratap College Srinagar, India.
- Botany Department, Faculty of Science, South Valley UniversityQena, Egypt; Biology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif UniversityTurabah, Saudi Arabia.
- Mycology and Plant Disease Survey Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agriculture Research CenterGiza, Egypt; Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud UniversityRiyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Centre for Environmental Research, Near East University Nicosia, Cyprus.
- Plant Abiotic Stress Research Group & Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Signaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource ScienceYokohama, Japan.
PMID: 27066020
PMCID: PMC4814448 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00347
Abstract
This work was designed to evaluate whether external application of nitric oxide (NO) in the form of its donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) could mitigate the deleterious effects of NaCl stress on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants. SNAP (50 μM) was applied to chickpea plants grown under non-saline and saline conditions (50 and 100 mM NaCl). Salt stress inhibited growth and biomass yield, leaf relative water content (LRWC) and chlorophyll content of chickpea plants. High salinity increased electrolyte leakage, carotenoid content and the levels of osmolytes (proline, glycine betaine, soluble proteins and soluble sugars), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA), as well as the activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase in chickpea plants. Expression of the representative SOD, CAT and APX genes examined was also up-regulated in chickpea plants by salt stress. On the other hand, exogenous application of NO to salinized plants enhanced the growth parameters, LRWC, photosynthetic pigment production and levels of osmolytes, as well as the activities of examined antioxidant enzymes which is correlated with up-regulation of the examined SOD, CAT and APX genes, in comparison with plants treated with NaCl only. Furthermore, electrolyte leakage, H2O2 and MDA contents showed decline in salt-stressed plants supplemented with NO as compared with those in NaCl-treated plants alone. Thus, the exogenous application of NO protected chickpea plants against salt stress-induced oxidative damage by enhancing the biosyntheses of antioxidant enzymes, thereby improving plant growth under saline stress. Taken together, our results demonstrate that NO has capability to mitigate the adverse effects of high salinity on chickpea plants by improving LRWC, photosynthetic pigment biosyntheses, osmolyte accumulation and antioxidative defense system.
Keywords: antioxidant enzymes; chickpea; gene expression; nitric oxide; osmolytes; salt stress
References
- J Exp Bot. 2002 May;53(372):1351-65 - PubMed
- J Plant Physiol. 2010 May 1;167(7):512-8 - PubMed
- Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Oct;29(10):1913-23 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 1987 Oct;85(2):529-36 - PubMed
- Front Plant Sci. 2015 May 18;6:340 - PubMed
- Plant Signal Behav. 2013 Nov;8(11):e26374 - PubMed
- Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):163-171 - PubMed
- Plant Sci. 2000 Aug 8;157(1):113-128 - PubMed
- Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;30(3):161-75 - PubMed
- J Biosci. 2005 Dec;30(5):761-76 - PubMed
- Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;33(1):23-39 - PubMed
- Front Plant Sci. 2013 Oct 29;4:419 - PubMed
- Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011 Oct;74(7):2050-6 - PubMed
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):8849-55 - PubMed
- Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-6 - PubMed
- Planta. 2009 Sep;230(4):755-65 - PubMed
- Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373-99 - PubMed
- Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Mar;49(3):411-9 - PubMed
- Zhi Wu Sheng Li Yu Fen Zi Sheng Wu Xue Xue Bao. 2004 Aug;30(4):455-9 - PubMed
- Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1995 Aug;46(3):215-23 - PubMed
- J Proteome Res. 2011 Oct 7;10(10):4349-64 - PubMed
- Protoplasma. 2011 Jul;248(3):447-55 - PubMed
- Plant Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;77(3):235-49 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2008;59(2):165-76 - PubMed
- J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 Apr;50(4):435-42 - PubMed
- Planta. 1976 Jan;133(1):21-5 - PubMed
- Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 1:S11-26 - PubMed
- Anal Biochem. 1971 Nov;44(1):276-87 - PubMed
- Plant Mol Biol. 2015 Apr;87(6):615-31 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2014 Feb;65(2):527-38 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015 Sep;94:104-13 - PubMed
- Mycorrhiza. 2014 Apr;24(3):197-208 - PubMed
- Plant Cell Rep. 2007 Oct;26(10):1909-17 - PubMed
- Front Plant Sci. 2015 Oct 14;6:868 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):755-67 - PubMed
- Nitric Oxide. 2012 Dec 1;27(4):210-8 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014 Jul;80:278-84 - PubMed
- Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
- Plant Cell Rep. 2012 Jan;31(1):145-54 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2008;59(14):3953-62 - PubMed
- Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Aug;38(8):1565-77 - PubMed
- Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Sep;13(9):499-505 - PubMed
- Mol Plant. 2015 Sep;8(9):1304-20 - PubMed
- New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):851-9 - PubMed
- Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Feb;8(1):93-102 - PubMed
Publication Types