Display options
Share it on

Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 31;7:347. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00347. eCollection 2016.

Nitric Oxide Mitigates Salt Stress by Regulating Levels of Osmolytes and Antioxidant Enzymes in Chickpea.

Frontiers in plant science

Parvaiz Ahmad, Arafat A Abdel Latef, Abeer Hashem, Elsayed F Abd Allah, Salih Gucel, Lam-Son P Tran

Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, Sri Pratap College Srinagar, India.
  2. Botany Department, Faculty of Science, South Valley UniversityQena, Egypt; Biology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif UniversityTurabah, Saudi Arabia.
  3. Mycology and Plant Disease Survey Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agriculture Research CenterGiza, Egypt; Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud UniversityRiyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  5. Centre for Environmental Research, Near East University Nicosia, Cyprus.
  6. Plant Abiotic Stress Research Group & Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Signaling Pathway Research Unit, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource ScienceYokohama, Japan.

PMID: 27066020 PMCID: PMC4814448 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00347

Abstract

This work was designed to evaluate whether external application of nitric oxide (NO) in the form of its donor S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) could mitigate the deleterious effects of NaCl stress on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants. SNAP (50 μM) was applied to chickpea plants grown under non-saline and saline conditions (50 and 100 mM NaCl). Salt stress inhibited growth and biomass yield, leaf relative water content (LRWC) and chlorophyll content of chickpea plants. High salinity increased electrolyte leakage, carotenoid content and the levels of osmolytes (proline, glycine betaine, soluble proteins and soluble sugars), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA), as well as the activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase in chickpea plants. Expression of the representative SOD, CAT and APX genes examined was also up-regulated in chickpea plants by salt stress. On the other hand, exogenous application of NO to salinized plants enhanced the growth parameters, LRWC, photosynthetic pigment production and levels of osmolytes, as well as the activities of examined antioxidant enzymes which is correlated with up-regulation of the examined SOD, CAT and APX genes, in comparison with plants treated with NaCl only. Furthermore, electrolyte leakage, H2O2 and MDA contents showed decline in salt-stressed plants supplemented with NO as compared with those in NaCl-treated plants alone. Thus, the exogenous application of NO protected chickpea plants against salt stress-induced oxidative damage by enhancing the biosyntheses of antioxidant enzymes, thereby improving plant growth under saline stress. Taken together, our results demonstrate that NO has capability to mitigate the adverse effects of high salinity on chickpea plants by improving LRWC, photosynthetic pigment biosyntheses, osmolyte accumulation and antioxidative defense system.

Keywords: antioxidant enzymes; chickpea; gene expression; nitric oxide; osmolytes; salt stress

References

  1. J Exp Bot. 2002 May;53(372):1351-65 - PubMed
  2. J Plant Physiol. 2010 May 1;167(7):512-8 - PubMed
  3. Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Oct;29(10):1913-23 - PubMed
  4. Plant Physiol. 1987 Oct;85(2):529-36 - PubMed
  5. Front Plant Sci. 2015 May 18;6:340 - PubMed
  6. Plant Signal Behav. 2013 Nov;8(11):e26374 - PubMed
  7. Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):163-171 - PubMed
  8. Plant Sci. 2000 Aug 8;157(1):113-128 - PubMed
  9. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010 Sep;30(3):161-75 - PubMed
  10. J Biosci. 2005 Dec;30(5):761-76 - PubMed
  11. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;33(1):23-39 - PubMed
  12. Front Plant Sci. 2013 Oct 29;4:419 - PubMed
  13. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011 Oct;74(7):2050-6 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):8849-55 - PubMed
  15. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-6 - PubMed
  16. Planta. 2009 Sep;230(4):755-65 - PubMed
  17. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373-99 - PubMed
  18. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008 Mar;49(3):411-9 - PubMed
  19. Zhi Wu Sheng Li Yu Fen Zi Sheng Wu Xue Xue Bao. 2004 Aug;30(4):455-9 - PubMed
  20. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1995 Aug;46(3):215-23 - PubMed
  21. J Proteome Res. 2011 Oct 7;10(10):4349-64 - PubMed
  22. Protoplasma. 2011 Jul;248(3):447-55 - PubMed
  23. Plant Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;77(3):235-49 - PubMed
  24. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(2):165-76 - PubMed
  25. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 Apr;50(4):435-42 - PubMed
  26. Planta. 1976 Jan;133(1):21-5 - PubMed
  27. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 1:S11-26 - PubMed
  28. Anal Biochem. 1971 Nov;44(1):276-87 - PubMed
  29. Plant Mol Biol. 2015 Apr;87(6):615-31 - PubMed
  30. J Exp Bot. 2014 Feb;65(2):527-38 - PubMed
  31. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015 Sep;94:104-13 - PubMed
  32. Mycorrhiza. 2014 Apr;24(3):197-208 - PubMed
  33. Plant Cell Rep. 2007 Oct;26(10):1909-17 - PubMed
  34. Front Plant Sci. 2015 Oct 14;6:868 - PubMed
  35. Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):755-67 - PubMed
  36. Nitric Oxide. 2012 Dec 1;27(4):210-8 - PubMed
  37. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014 Jul;80:278-84 - PubMed
  38. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
  39. Plant Cell Rep. 2012 Jan;31(1):145-54 - PubMed
  40. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(14):3953-62 - PubMed
  41. Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Aug;38(8):1565-77 - PubMed
  42. Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Sep;13(9):499-505 - PubMed
  43. Mol Plant. 2015 Sep;8(9):1304-20 - PubMed
  44. New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):851-9 - PubMed
  45. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Feb;8(1):93-102 - PubMed

Publication Types