Display options
Share it on

RMD Open. 2016 Mar 15;2(1):e000159. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000159. eCollection 2016.

Therapeutic and diagnostic outcomes of a standardised, comprehensive care pathway for patients with systemic sclerosis.

RMD open

Jessica Meijs, Anne A Schouffoer, Nina Ajmone Marsan, Lucia J M Kroft, Theo Stijnen, Maarten K Ninaber, Tom W J Huizinga, Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland, Jeska K de Vries-Bouwstra

Affiliations

  1. Department of Rheumatology , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
  2. Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  3. Department of Cardiology , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
  4. Department of Radiology , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
  5. Department of Medical Statistics , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
  6. Department of Pulmonology , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
  7. Department of Orthopaedics , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.

PMID: 27042333 PMCID: PMC4800807 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000159

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the outcomes, including number of medical interventions and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment of a standardised, comprehensive, diagnostic care pathway for patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Patient characteristics associated with need for medical interventions and with need for immunosuppressive treatment were determined.

METHODS: Data were routinely gathered in connection with a 2-day care pathway combining multidisciplinary care and complete diagnostic work-up of organ involvement in SSc. The number of patients in whom the pathway resulted in medical interventions, and/or initiation of immunosuppressives was recorded. Patient characteristics and diagnostic tests results were compared between patients with and without medical interventions, and patients with and without initiation of immunosuppressives by means of multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS: During a period of 44 months, 226 patients with SSc were referred to the care pathway. They included 186 (82%) women with mean age of 54 (SD 14.5) years, and median disease duration of 4 years (range 1-11); 73 (32%) of them had diffuse cutaneous SSc. Medical interventions were initiated in 191 (85%) patients, including initiation of immunosuppressive treatment in n=49 (22%). Presence of telangiectasias and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate were associated with any medical intervention. Of commonly available variables, lower age, higher skin score and absence of anticentromere antibody were associated with initiation of immunosuppressives.

CONCLUSIONS: A standardised comprehensive 2-day care pathway for patients with SSc resulted in additional diagnostic or therapeutic interventions in 85% of the patients, regardless of SSc subtype and disease duration. In 22% of the patients, immunosuppressive treatment was initiated.

Keywords: Multidisciplinary team-care; Systemic Sclerosis; Treatment

References

  1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 May;68(5):620-8 - PubMed
  2. Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Jun;30(6):815-24 - PubMed
  3. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;66(6):1625-35 - PubMed
  4. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Feb;43(4):526-35 - PubMed
  5. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):103-9 - PubMed
  6. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R172 - PubMed
  7. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1340-9 - PubMed
  8. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7 - PubMed
  9. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Jul-Aug;33(4 Suppl 91):S75-9 - PubMed
  10. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1124-31 - PubMed
  11. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23 (7):685-713; quiz 786-8 - PubMed
  12. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6 Suppl 86):S-88-93 - PubMed
  13. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 May;23(5):581-90 - PubMed
  14. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jun;51(6):1017-26 - PubMed
  15. J Affect Disord. 2007 Feb;98(1-2):91-7 - PubMed
  16. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Jul;53(7):1172-7 - PubMed
  17. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 May;68(5):629-34 - PubMed
  18. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Jul-Aug;33(4 Suppl 91):S106-10 - PubMed
  19. QJM. 2010 Feb;103(2):109-15 - PubMed
  20. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jun;66(6):754-63 - PubMed
  21. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;51(4):309-10, 313 - PubMed
  22. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2012 Dec;43(3):249-55 - PubMed
  23. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Mar;44(3):653-61 - PubMed
  24. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Jun;24(3):387-400 - PubMed
  25. JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2490-8 - PubMed
  26. J Rheumatol. 2013 Sep;40(9):1545-56 - PubMed
  27. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun 1;177(11):1248-54 - PubMed
  28. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Oct;67(10):1426-39 - PubMed
  29. J Rheumatol. 2012 Nov;39(11):2127-33 - PubMed
  30. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003 May;29(2):255-73, vi - PubMed
  31. J Rheumatol. 2001 Jul;28(7):1573-6 - PubMed
  32. Autoimmun Rev. 2003 Oct;2(6):370-6 - PubMed
  33. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Mar-Apr;29(2 Suppl 65):S33-9 - PubMed
  34. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Nov;43(11):2437-44 - PubMed
  35. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;33(6):825-32 - PubMed
  36. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan 15;165(2):277-304 - PubMed
  37. J Rheumatol. 2000 Jan;27(1):155-60 - PubMed
  38. Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(3):217-20 - PubMed

Publication Types