Saudi Pharm J. 2016 Mar;24(2):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
Investigation of the efficacy of generic and brand-name tiotropium bromide in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized comparative trial.
Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society
Yunes Panahi, Mostafa Ghanei, Mohammad Behzadi, Maryam Salehi, Sara Saffar Soflaei, Amirhossein Sahebkar
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Chemical Injuries Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Neurogenic Inflammation Research Center, Department of Modern Sciences and Technologies, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- Biotechnology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Cardiometabolic Research Centre, Royal Perth Hospital, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
PMID: 27013907
PMCID: PMC4792902 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.01.005
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The beneficial effects of tiotropium bromide, a long acting anticholinergic bronchodilator, in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been shown in previous studies. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic (Tiova®) and brand-name (Spiriva®) tiotropium preparations in patients with COPD.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this randomized double-blind parallel-group trial, 79 patients with documented COPD were assigned to Tiova® or Spiriva® for a period of 4 weeks. Assessment of pulmonary function (using spirometry), quality-of-life (using St. George respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]) and severity of respiratory symptoms (using breathlessness, cough and sputum scale [BCSS]) was performed at baseline and at the end of treatment period.
RESULTS: There were significant increases in FEV1 and reductions in FVC by the end of study in both Tiova® and Spiriva® groups. FEV1/FVC ratio did not change significantly neither in the Tiova® nor in Spiriva® group. Overall SGRQ score as well as subscale scores of symptoms, activity and impacts were improved by both drugs. In the BCSS scale, the frequency and severity of three main symptoms (dyspnea, cough and sputum) was decreased by both drugs. Baseline as well as post-treatment values of spirometric parameters, SGRQ and BCSS scores was comparable between the groups, apart from a lower post-treatment frequency of cough and sputum in the Spiriva® versus Tiova® group. There was no report of adverse events in either of the study groups.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this comparative trial showed equivalent efficacy and safety of Spiriva® and Tiova® in lessening the symptoms as well as improving the quality of life in patients with COPD. This finding has an important translational value given the significantly lower costs of generic versus brand-name products.
Keywords: Anticholinergic; Bronchodilator; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Generic; Randomized controlled trial; Tiotropium bromide
References
- Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;19(3):297-315 - PubMed
- Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007 May-Jun;34(5-6):494-8 - PubMed
- Clin Lab. 2012;58(11-12):1179-85 - PubMed
- Acta Clin Belg. 2009 Sep-Oct;64(5):406-14 - PubMed
- BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013 Jan 05;14:1 - PubMed
- JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1077-84 - PubMed
- Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1998 May-Jun;43(3):139-49 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;(7):CD009285 - PubMed
- Chest. 2003 Dec;124(6):2182-91 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1543-54 - PubMed
- Clin Lab. 2012;58(7-8):737-45 - PubMed
- Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 15;187(4):347-65 - PubMed
- Iran J Pharm Res. 2012 Fall;11(4):1059-64 - PubMed
- Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Feb 9;126(4):441-3 - PubMed
- Redox Rep. 2014 May;19(3):107-17 - PubMed
- Respir Med. 1991 Sep;85 Suppl B:25-31; discussion 33-7 - PubMed
- Respir Care. 2011 Apr;56(4):477-87 - PubMed
- Circ J. 2006 Dec;70(12):1658-60 - PubMed
Publication Types