Display options
Share it on

J Sports Sci Med. 2016 Feb 23;15(1):41-9. eCollection 2016 Mar.

Effects of Cycling Versus Running Training on Sprint and Endurance Capacity in Inline Speed Skating.

Journal of sports science & medicine

Carolin Stangier, Thomas Abel, Julia Mierau, Wildor Hollmann, Heiko K Strüder

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Movement and Neurosciences, German Sport University , Cologne, Germany.
  2. Institute of Cardiology and Sports Medicine, German Sport University , Cologne, Germany.

PMID: 26957925 PMCID: PMC4763845

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of running versus cycling training on sprint and endurance capacity in inline speed skating. Sixteen elite athletes (8 male, 8 female, 24 ± 8 yrs) were randomly assigned into 2 training groups performing either 2 session per week of treadmill running or ergometer cycling in addition to 3 skating specific sessions (technique, plyometrics, parkour) for 8 weeks. Training intensity was determined within non-specific (cycling or running) and effects on specific endurance capacity within a specific incremental exercise test. Before and after the intervention all athletes performed a specific (300m) and one non-specific (30s cycling or 200m running) all-out sprint test according to the group affiliation. To determine the accumulation of blood lactate (BLa) and glucose (BGL) 20 μl arterialized blood was drawn at rest, as well as in 1 min intervals for 10 min after the sprint test. The sport-specific peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) was significantly increased (+17%; p = 0.01) in both groups and highly correlated with the sprint performance (r = -0.71). BLa values decreased significantly (-18%, p = 0.02) after the specific sprint test from pre to post-testing without any group effect. However, BGL values only showed a significant decrease (-2%, p = 0.04) in the running group. The close relationship between aerobic capacity and sprint performance in inline speed skating highlights the positive effects of endurance training. Although both training programs were equally effective in improving endurance and sprint capacities, the metabolic results indicate a faster recovery after high intensity efforts for all athletes, as well as a higher reliance on the fat metabolism for athletes who trained in the running group. Key pointsIn addition to a highly developed aerobic performance inline speed skaters also require a highly trained anaerobic capacity to be effective in the sprint sections such as the mass start, tactical attacks and finish line sprint.An 8-week low-intensity endurance training program of either cycling or running training combined with additional routine training improves classical aerobic characteristics (17% increase of VO2 peak), as well as values for acceleration and speed.Athletes who trained in the running group demonstrated a higher reliance on the fat metabolism in the sport-specific post-testing.The significant reduction in anaerobic ATP turnover during repeated sprints appears to be partially compensated by an increase in VO2 in subsequent sprint. The results revealed a close relationship between the aerobic capacity and sprint performance in inline speed skating.

Keywords: Aerobic metabolism; all-out sprint test; blood glucose concentration

References

  1. Int J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;34(12):1025-8 - PubMed
  2. J Appl Physiol. 1972 Sep;33(3):312-9 - PubMed
  3. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Nov;28(11):1422-6 - PubMed
  4. Sports Med. 2000 Jun;29(6):373-86 - PubMed
  5. Sports Med. 1994 Nov;18(5):330-9 - PubMed
  6. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2570-6 - PubMed
  7. J Sports Sci. 2009 Aug;27(10):1069-77 - PubMed
  8. J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Nov;20(4):947-54 - PubMed
  9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Dec;25(12):1393-7 - PubMed
  10. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006 Feb;16(1):49-56 - PubMed
  11. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Mar;86(5):435-41 - PubMed
  12. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Nov;25(11):1275-8 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(4):367-72 - PubMed
  14. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 May;72(5):1649-56 - PubMed
  15. J Biomech. 1999 Apr;32(4):409-15 - PubMed
  16. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Dec;67(6):2376-82 - PubMed
  17. Sports Med. 2007;37(4-5):341-3 - PubMed
  18. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1299-305 - PubMed
  19. Sports Med. 1994 Apr;17(4):259-75 - PubMed
  20. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Jan;88(4-5):317-38 - PubMed
  21. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 Apr;56(4):406-14 - PubMed
  22. Experientia. 1996 May 15;52(5):416-20 - PubMed
  23. J Biomech. 1992 Jun;25(6):573-80 - PubMed
  24. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Oct;31(10):1433-40 - PubMed
  25. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Sep;5(3):276-91 - PubMed
  26. Sports Med. 2001;31(10):725-41 - PubMed
  27. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Dec;21(6):655-61 - PubMed
  28. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Feb;28(2):247-50 - PubMed
  29. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 May;86(5):1527-33 - PubMed
  30. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Aug;55(2):628-34 - PubMed
  31. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 Sep;56(9):1007-12 - PubMed
  32. Sports Med. 1995 Jan;19(1):1-8 - PubMed
  33. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Mar;68(3):990-6 - PubMed
  34. Int J Sports Med. 2004 Jan;25(1):32-7 - PubMed
  35. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990 Oct;22(5):718-28 - PubMed
  36. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Jun;5(2):165-76 - PubMed
  37. Int J Sports Med. 1993 Feb;14(2):72-7 - PubMed
  38. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Aug;75(2):712-9 - PubMed
  39. Int J Sports Med. 1985 Jun;6(3):117-30 - PubMed
  40. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1981;47(1):93-104 - PubMed
  41. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 May;35(5):826-31 - PubMed
  42. Int J Sports Med. 1990 Aug;11(4):267-72 - PubMed
  43. Sports Med. 2010 Oct 1;40(10):859-95 - PubMed
  44. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jun;30(6):1597-606 - PubMed
  45. Sports Med. 2009;39(3):179-206 - PubMed
  46. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(1):6-9 - PubMed
  47. Sports Med. 2007;37(7):575-86 - PubMed
  48. Int J Sports Med. 2000 Nov;21(8):593-7 - PubMed

Publication Types